Skip to main content

Rush Agrees with the Mac'ster?

Listening to Rush Limbaugh now, seems he agrees a little with my point about Inside Hillary. Basically he's "calling out" conservative bloggers on 'taking a high road' on the book. Listen in. If you miss it the transcript should be available later this evening on his website

UPDATE: Starting to get some 'reponses' to my Inside Hillary Post. Like this:

"Let me comment this way. Klein is sifting through salacious heresay on sexual and marital personal matters to Hillary to conclude she is a liberal. All the unnecessary, and quite honestly thinnly veiled, attacks are not necessary to conclude the obvious. I linked to a Mark Steyn column which sums it up nicely since he had the displeasure to read this trash. I know Hillary is a liberal, I don't need to support this conclusion with crude rumor mongering. Finally, this is the same kind of BS that happened to Jack and Jerry Ryan in his senate race last year. A court opened up their private divorce files to invade their marriage and dig dirt. That disgusted me too. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."

Ok, so long as you have read the book you are intitled to your opinion. As of yet I don't have it. No, I didn't think a charge about Hilary being "raped" was entirely appropriate (although with Bill Clinton anything is possible), but then there are parts of MacBeth that I have issues with (don't ask). I haven't read the book yet and won't know if it has any value to me until I do.

My point is that everyone that wants to read the book, go ahead read it and make your own decision. Don't let a blogger tell you not to, or the New York Times or MSNBC or anyone else. Heck, I read Bush World and Plan of Attack, just so I could form my own opinion about what the book said. Before I say something about the merits of any work I'm not going to have say one on it one way or another, before I read it. I personally don't read "excerpts" or other people's opinions about what something says, or does not say. I'm a Dinosaur - I make up my own mind after seeing it for myself.

After I read it, I'll form "My Opinion", which you might like, you might not like - but at least it will be MY opinion.

Again, the interesting thing about all of this it appears that some bloggers are a little "apprehensive" about being NOT lumped with those "crazy right wingers" the libs are always talking about. It's hard to tell the "left" from the Right". Rush thinks it's almost like some conservative blogs are playing a kiss-up job to the MSM (his thoughts people not mine) - although I think he may be on to something there. I'm not judging that. Judge your own motives.

In any case, I remember a college professor told me a good approach to anything I read - even if I think I won't like it - "Eat the hay, spit out the sticks". For instance, I remember doing an extensive paper on Martin Luther (The Theologian). I read every work I could get my hands on was written on the man - goog, bad and blatantly smearing. Yet in everything I read I got at least some insight to his life and times. Yes, the paper received an A (the only one I got that year - but it was an A!).


Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?


As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Able Danger - Sign Up - Get the Truth

Per the Able Danger Blog (newly added link), get over to this petition and sign ur name. Again, if there is any chance of true bi-partisan hearings, the people are going to have to speak up and loud.

Just do it!

Newsbusters Busts the MSM on Bush Event

Newsbusters, the blog of Brent Bozell's Media Research Center, exposes the MSM attempt to spin President Bush's meeting with troops into a 'staged event'.

Truth is that the event was not staged, the troops were telling their real feelings: that they support the war and our President.

I guess they might have this story mixed up with the "planted question" to Sec. Rumsfeld back in December 2004.

Yet, that wasn't the case here, Soldiers when asked, will tell you the truth.

Just like in this picture, they tell it like it is!

Michelle Malkin has links to other reactions. Also Blogs for Bush.

UPDATE I: Michelle has a further reponse from one of the soldiers in the video. Here's an excerpt:

"First of all, we were told that we would be speaking with the President of the United States, our Commander-in-Chief, President Bush, so I believe that it would have been totally irresponsible for us NOT to prepare some ideas, facts or comments that we wanted to share …