Skip to main content

So clear that even the idiots in the media won't understand

AP: Bush says he will fire anyone who breaks law

This is sweet. The media is reporting that President Bush has clarified his position that anyone who broke the law in the Plame Game would be fired.

Yet they are trying to make this out as if he said something different than what he said before......(idiots).

As in the AP subheadline above: "President appears to qualify standard for firing in CIA-leak case"

What clarification? He said back in 2003 the same thing he is saying now.

"If there is a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it is and if the person has violated the law, the person will be taken care of." Bush 2003

"If someone committed a crime, they will no longer work in my administration." Bush today.

So where is the clarification AP?

Need more? Check out BlogsforBush for more comparisons of what President Bush said then and now. Also visit Tom Maguire's take on it.

In every case he said anyone is FOUND to have broken a law, they will be dealt with - fired, whatever.

That is AFTER they have been found to be guilty - that is, if they are found - by the Special Prosecutor who is doing the investigation.

But the media, is sadly, insaned by the "blood" they smell, so they want to play semantics. For instance a press briefing I caught on CSPAN with Scott McCLellan getting the same ole lame ass questions by the Washington Press Corp. A= McClellan, B=WPC and Helen Thomas.

Q. But you had said that anyone involved with this would no longer be in this administration, you didn't say anyone who committed a crime.

A. Yeah, we've been through these issues over the past week, I know what was said previously.

Q. Did the president equate the word leaking to a crime? Is the only threshold for firing someone involved being charged with a crime?

Q. Two years and he can't call Rove in and find out what the hell is going on? (Helen Thomas, who else) All he has to do is call him in?

A. Because there's an investigation continuing at this point, the appropriate people handling these issues are the people investigating this investigation.


(snort)

Too bad the investigation isn't being done by the media or any one of a hundred other pundits and idiots who spent the better part of last week and, even today, trying to get Karl Rove fired (convicted and executed) before the investigation is complete.

What he said then, he is saying now.

If he is making it clear its because someone are "slower" than others, and being a President high on education and smarter than most pundits, he has to clarify so that even they can get it. But they won't. They are too "into" their predrawn conclusions.

Good thing the President isn't such a person and no matter what the media clamors for, Rove; or anyone else for that matter isn't going anywhere until the investigation is completed and the true facts are known.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Is the lid about to be blown off Able Danger?

Those who have been wishing for a full blown Able Danger investigation are about to get their wish. The "gate" has been unlocked.

9/11 Iraqi Connection

With Democrats calling for yet more investigations into pre-war intelligence, and Republicans like myself pushing back to help their 'sudden amnesia”, the growing stories of Able Danger and even China Gate, are beginning to make news.

The three main theories about why Able Danger hasn't gotten out of the "blog stage", are 1) To hide Clinton era responsibility for stopping the 9/11 attacks, and/or 2) To hide the truth behind China-Gate, or 3) The facts show that there in fact was a direct link between Iraq and 9/11.

Taking either one you can see why the Clinton worshipping MSM for the most part hasn't touched the story. Of the later point, Democrats, the MSM and even some of our investigations state that there was no 'direct' link between Iraq and 9/11. Say otherwise and the MSM will slice and di…

Able Danger - Pulling Back the Covers of the real Clinton Legacy

First, let's dispense with the bull crap. The meeting between Mohammed Atta and Iraqi Intelligence officer Al-Ani, on April 8th, 2001 happened.

Yet, just don't mention it to the MSM, becaue since May of 2002, the MSM declared an all out assault on the story. A meeting incidently, that the Czech government has to this date stood by.

Let's review a little history:

October 13, 2001: Story of the meeting is leaked from somewhere in the Czech foreign service.

yet.....

October 20, 2001: Ny Times, John Tagliabue writes a story citing other Czech officials said the meeting never took place.

so.....

October 26, 2001: Czech Minister of the Interior, Stanislav Gross has a press conference not only confirming the orginal report but giving further details of Atta's other trip to Prague in June 2000.

then.....

October 27, 2001: The NY Times "recants" the October 20th denial.

The story continues it's oddessy of 'back and forth' until May 1st, 2002, when Walter P…