Skip to main content

Peter Jennings and the Anti-Smoking crowds

Forces International

Watching the news since Peter Jennings died of lung cancer, and the constant parade of anti-smoking slanted news, I thought people would like a few facts that you won't get anywhere else.

First, the "passive smoking" issue. In a word, it's a fraud. Don't take my word for it - visit FORCES International to get a real education on how basically "junk science" got accepted as fact.

Now with that out of the way, I don't smoke, gave it up years ago. In 1999 my mother died of Lung Cancer. She had been a smoker years before. We just accepted it at the time that her "past" had caught up with her.

However, after she died the doctor told us something that shocked us at the time, but that I've since verified with other doctors.

She didn't die of lung cancer BECAUSE of her past smoking, but because of a tumor in her colon that metastisized to her lungs.

Then he began to show us data that showed that of all lung cancer smoking is attributed to only eight-percent of lung cancers. The remaining ninety-two percent is attributed to other causes such as what my mother had.

Interesting enough I sat in on an Amercian Cancer Society briefing a while back. During the presentation they stated that studies showed that tobacco by itself in it's natural state before processing contains no known carcenojins. It's what the tobbacco companies do to the cigarette AFTER the harvest that cause the problems. The solution, buy 'native' tobacco and roll your own. Don't laugh! That's exactly what they said.

Now I know this sounds like bull cr*p, but consider this:

The investment in antismoking activities by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, philanthropic arm of Johnson & Johnson, between 1992 and 2000 in one nation alone, the United States: well over 300 million dollars have been invested by just one multinational in financing antitobacco activities and "grass root" antismoking groups.

Again, if you don't smoke that's cool, but if you do and you're feeling the heat to quit, visit FORCES and get some really good data that isn't "paid" for by those with an agenda. Then make your decision and educated one.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Is the lid about to be blown off Able Danger?

Those who have been wishing for a full blown Able Danger investigation are about to get their wish. The "gate" has been unlocked.

9/11 Iraqi Connection

With Democrats calling for yet more investigations into pre-war intelligence, and Republicans like myself pushing back to help their 'sudden amnesia”, the growing stories of Able Danger and even China Gate, are beginning to make news.

The three main theories about why Able Danger hasn't gotten out of the "blog stage", are 1) To hide Clinton era responsibility for stopping the 9/11 attacks, and/or 2) To hide the truth behind China-Gate, or 3) The facts show that there in fact was a direct link between Iraq and 9/11.

Taking either one you can see why the Clinton worshipping MSM for the most part hasn't touched the story. Of the later point, Democrats, the MSM and even some of our investigations state that there was no 'direct' link between Iraq and 9/11. Say otherwise and the MSM will slice and di…

Monday Morning Intelligence with Kool Aid and the NY Times - UPDATE

Followup to previous post.

NY Times: 9/11 Commission's Staff Rejected Report on Early Identification of Chief Hijacker

Ok, I've been on the phone now for...oh, about three days, to some old chums in Tampa, checking this story out, asking questions,...etc. So far what I've heard is that IF this story is true, then those who are really in the know in the Intel world are feeling like a bunch of little red-hair step-childred.

Ed. Morissey is ready to hang the 911 Commission out to dry......mmm,

Ed, not so fast my friend.

Again, I am amazed at the vercacity the NY Times and AP is getting on this story, and from the same conservative bloggers who are normally parsing every "dot and tittle" the Times puts out. Who would think?...

Yeah, there is a lot of "anger" because of "Gorelick" fever where the blogshere and conservative media rightfully called attention to her conflict of interest while serving on the commission. But we can't let the "gotc…