Skip to main content

Peter Jennings and the Anti-Smoking crowds

Forces International

Watching the news since Peter Jennings died of lung cancer, and the constant parade of anti-smoking slanted news, I thought people would like a few facts that you won't get anywhere else.

First, the "passive smoking" issue. In a word, it's a fraud. Don't take my word for it - visit FORCES International to get a real education on how basically "junk science" got accepted as fact.

Now with that out of the way, I don't smoke, gave it up years ago. In 1999 my mother died of Lung Cancer. She had been a smoker years before. We just accepted it at the time that her "past" had caught up with her.

However, after she died the doctor told us something that shocked us at the time, but that I've since verified with other doctors.

She didn't die of lung cancer BECAUSE of her past smoking, but because of a tumor in her colon that metastisized to her lungs.

Then he began to show us data that showed that of all lung cancer smoking is attributed to only eight-percent of lung cancers. The remaining ninety-two percent is attributed to other causes such as what my mother had.

Interesting enough I sat in on an Amercian Cancer Society briefing a while back. During the presentation they stated that studies showed that tobacco by itself in it's natural state before processing contains no known carcenojins. It's what the tobbacco companies do to the cigarette AFTER the harvest that cause the problems. The solution, buy 'native' tobacco and roll your own. Don't laugh! That's exactly what they said.

Now I know this sounds like bull cr*p, but consider this:

The investment in antismoking activities by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, philanthropic arm of Johnson & Johnson, between 1992 and 2000 in one nation alone, the United States: well over 300 million dollars have been invested by just one multinational in financing antitobacco activities and "grass root" antismoking groups.

Again, if you don't smoke that's cool, but if you do and you're feeling the heat to quit, visit FORCES and get some really good data that isn't "paid" for by those with an agenda. Then make your decision and educated one.


Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?


As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Able Danger - Sign Up - Get the Truth

Per the Able Danger Blog (newly added link), get over to this petition and sign ur name. Again, if there is any chance of true bi-partisan hearings, the people are going to have to speak up and loud.

Just do it!

Newsbusters Busts the MSM on Bush Event

Newsbusters, the blog of Brent Bozell's Media Research Center, exposes the MSM attempt to spin President Bush's meeting with troops into a 'staged event'.

Truth is that the event was not staged, the troops were telling their real feelings: that they support the war and our President.

I guess they might have this story mixed up with the "planted question" to Sec. Rumsfeld back in December 2004.

Yet, that wasn't the case here, Soldiers when asked, will tell you the truth.

Just like in this picture, they tell it like it is!

Michelle Malkin has links to other reactions. Also Blogs for Bush.

UPDATE I: Michelle has a further reponse from one of the soldiers in the video. Here's an excerpt:

"First of all, we were told that we would be speaking with the President of the United States, our Commander-in-Chief, President Bush, so I believe that it would have been totally irresponsible for us NOT to prepare some ideas, facts or comments that we wanted to share …