Skip to main content

Giving it up for Chris Matthews

I'm hard on Chris Matthews sometimes. Was when I was reporting, and even now with this "blogging thing". But you've got to give credit where credit's due.

On Hardball the other night, Chris had on Liberal Hack Mark Green, who made the baseless but oft repeated Nancy Pelosi accusation that "The Bush administration is corrupt".

Chris called him on it. The Political Teen has the video here.

Transcript:

"MATTHEWS: Can you name a conviction, Mark?

BEN GINSBURG: Thank you Chris.

GREEN: Hold it. hold it. What I said was

MATTHEWS: Name a conviction?

GREEN: One second. What I said was that six people, three people have been indicted. By the way Chris, if you and I have been indicted, it doesn’t mean we’re guilty, but we wouldn’t trade places ..

MATTHEWS: No no no. I just want to know, when you call an administration has a, has a culture of corruption, I think you need one case of proven guilt, don’t you? At least one case of proven guilt."


The fact is that Green couldn't name one conviction, because there hasn't been any. But as a rule Democrats scream "politics of personal destruction" when they get caught with their "pants down", and then are the first to jump on the "gotcha" bandwagon when it's someone else.

Hypocrites, and it's about time they got called on it.

I wish the MSM as a whole had the same guts to go after Nancy Pelosi after she referred to the Bush Administration as "Culture of Corruption".

She's a fine one to talk about ethics and corruption. In fact, in the coming months (inside tip) she's going to be eating those words and crying Clinton's song. I'll be there to cover it.

The fact is that if Chris Matthews, pretty much a partisan liberal can't stand Green's obvious bull crap, then the American people (except the Moonbat left) aren't buying it either.

The fact is that whoever commits a criminal act should be charged and tried and IF guilty punished, whatever party they belong to.

But the Democratic Party has become the Party of "Gotcha" and like Glady Kravits of Bewitched is constantly staring out the windown at the White House, screaming for anyone to hear, "Abner! Abner! Look at what the Steven's are up to!"

That's why they're a dying (if not already dead) party. No ideas, just neuroticism.








Filed under:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Is the lid about to be blown off Able Danger?

Those who have been wishing for a full blown Able Danger investigation are about to get their wish. The "gate" has been unlocked.

9/11 Iraqi Connection

With Democrats calling for yet more investigations into pre-war intelligence, and Republicans like myself pushing back to help their 'sudden amnesia”, the growing stories of Able Danger and even China Gate, are beginning to make news.

The three main theories about why Able Danger hasn't gotten out of the "blog stage", are 1) To hide Clinton era responsibility for stopping the 9/11 attacks, and/or 2) To hide the truth behind China-Gate, or 3) The facts show that there in fact was a direct link between Iraq and 9/11.

Taking either one you can see why the Clinton worshipping MSM for the most part hasn't touched the story. Of the later point, Democrats, the MSM and even some of our investigations state that there was no 'direct' link between Iraq and 9/11. Say otherwise and the MSM will slice and di…

Able Danger - Pulling Back the Covers of the real Clinton Legacy

First, let's dispense with the bull crap. The meeting between Mohammed Atta and Iraqi Intelligence officer Al-Ani, on April 8th, 2001 happened.

Yet, just don't mention it to the MSM, becaue since May of 2002, the MSM declared an all out assault on the story. A meeting incidently, that the Czech government has to this date stood by.

Let's review a little history:

October 13, 2001: Story of the meeting is leaked from somewhere in the Czech foreign service.

yet.....

October 20, 2001: Ny Times, John Tagliabue writes a story citing other Czech officials said the meeting never took place.

so.....

October 26, 2001: Czech Minister of the Interior, Stanislav Gross has a press conference not only confirming the orginal report but giving further details of Atta's other trip to Prague in June 2000.

then.....

October 27, 2001: The NY Times "recants" the October 20th denial.

The story continues it's oddessy of 'back and forth' until May 1st, 2002, when Walter P…