For Third Yeah in a Row Zahra Billoo Bashes American Dead on Memorial Day

Via Fire Andrea Mitchell.

It wouldn’t be a Memorial Day without the Muslim terrorist-linked group CAIR bashing US Troops. This is actually the third year in a row Zahra Billoo has bashed US Troops for Memorial Day. Billoo is the executive director of CAIR’s San Francisco Bay Area chapter. Islam in San Francisco. Imagine that. CAIR has links to many terrorist organizations including the Muslim Brotherhood. 

Follow the link for more.  Billoo is nothing more than a terrorist twit, a spokeswoman for the same tripe we hear from ISIS, and other terrorist organizations that CAIR covertly supports. 

Time for them to be called on the carpet for this and their designation of a non-profit organization should be changed to a place on the terrorism watch list.

Washington Post's Fake News about Jared Kushner Busted: Kushner didn't suggest Back Door Channel

Well, once again yet another fake story from the Washington Post is proved wrong. Via Fox News.

A December meeting between Jared Kushner, President Donald Trump’s son-in-law and one of the senior advisers in the Trump administration, and Russian ambassador Sergei Kislyak at Trump Tower focused on Syria, a source familiar with the matter told Fox News Monday. 

During the meeting the Russians broached the idea of using a secure line between the Trump administration and Russia, not Kushner, a source familiar with the matter told Fox News. That follows a recent report from The Washington Post alleging that Kushner wanted to develop a secure, private line with Russia. 

The idea of a permanent back channel was never discussed, according to the source. Instead, only a one-off for a call about Syria was raised in the conversation.
In addition, the source told Fox News the December meeting focused on Russia's contention that the Obama administration's policy on Syria was deeply flawed.

In the Washington Post's rush to smear Trump yet again their fake new was again found to be, fake.   Thus the Washington Post is gaining a reputation similar to that of the National Enquire.

In real journalism sourcing is important, but it's also important to use sources who were actually there, not someone who wasn't, and perhaps has no idea of what was said.

In muckraking, you go after someone with baseless smears in order to inflict damage.  That term, by the way, was invented the progressive approach to smearing an opponent in politics.

Bernie Sanders Donors file 300 Million Dollar Lawsuit against the DNC

By now it's clear that the DNC kneecapped the Sanders campaign in the primaries to give Hillary the nomination.  Now they're going to court over it, to the tune of 300 million bucks.

Of all the weird sideshows in American politics, the one unfolding in a Florida courtroom may be one of the strangest. Largely uncovered by anything resembling the elite political media, a passel of disgruntled Bernie Sanders donors has filed a $300 million class-action suit against the Democratic National Committee for $300 million alleging that the DNC defrauded them by rigging the primary process against the Sanders campaign.

 From Newsweek:

Jared Beck, a Harvard Law graduate and one of the several attorneys who filed the suit against the DNC and its former chairperson Debbie Wasserman Schultz, wants retribution for donations made by supporters to the Vermont senator's campaign, citing six legal claims of the DNC's deceptive conduct, negligent misrepresentation, and fraud. The DNC violated Article 5, Section 4 of its own charter by working with a single campaign to effectively choose who would win the Democratic ballot, the attorneys stated in the suit. 

All the usual complaints are rolled into this suit—the leaked-debate-questions gripe, the donor-info insecurity, and the villain of the piece is Debbie Wasserman Schultz. There's a judge's order pending that might let the air out of the whole thing. Of course, everything the DNC does to defend itself in court will be further evidence of the ongoing cabal. Per CDN:
Jared H. Beck, attorney for the plaintiffs, argued, "Freedom of speech and freedom of association are very, very important, but we also have a right not to be defrauded. We also have a right not to be taken advantage of … We have a right not to be deceived. There's no exception to those rights just because the fraudulent speech or fraudulent conduct involved takes place in a political context.

We'll have to see how this works out.  We know the DNC stopped at nothing to get Hillary into the White House.  During the debates with Donald Trump, it was found that interim DNC chief cheated by supplying questions to Hillary she obtained through the media.

Looking forward to this day in court, but the DNC runs like a small town sheriff so don't be surprised if the Judge is threatened in some way by them, or other political pressure to drop the case.

Media Matters has Violated it's Tax Exemption Status and it's Time it's been Revoked

Back in 2011 I and many others including Fox News, as well many bloggers wrote that Media Matters non-profit status should be revoked, and as such should be charged IRS taxes  There are very stringent rules for gaining non-profit profit status to be considered non-taxable by the IRS., and many don't's.  One of those is in regards to political activities.  Here's the rule in question.

It may not be an action organization, i.e., it may not attempt to influence legislation as a substantial part of its activities and it may not participate in any campaign activity for or against political candidates. 

Organizations described in section 501(c)(3) are commonly referred to as charitable organizations. Organizations described in section 501(c)(3), other than testing for public safety organizations, are eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions in accordance with Code section 170. 

The organization must not be organized or operated for the benefit of private interests, and no part of a section 501(c)(3) organization's net earnings may inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual. If the organization engages in an excess benefit transaction with a person having substantial influence over the organization, an excise tax may be imposed on the person and any organization managers agreeing to the transaction.

Media Matters from its inception by activist David Brock, have long violated this rule with political activities such as backing specific candidates for office such as Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Media Matters does nothing but to serve the anti-conservative derangement of David Brook to get all conservative media off the air.

Most recently it's been an organized effort to have Fox News fire Sean Hannity, which is a blatant violation of the code.

Even Mark Levin has suggested that Hannity sue Media Matters for attempting to influence his employment contract with Fox by pressuring sponsors of his show to drop support.  I agree that this is exactly what Hannity should do and likely will do, nevertheless there has never been a non-profit status that has survived this type of activity.

Between 2011 and 2014 the Fox News Network attempted to have the exemption for Media Matters revoked, however, the IRS (embroiled in its own scandals), never fully looked into it.  More than likely President Obama pushed to have it dropped.

But now with Trump in office, it's time for a new effort.  The same IRS director is in office minus pressure from a lawless president.  

You can personally file a complaint with the IRS at this link.  Additionally, contact your Congressional representative or Senator and ask them to look into it.

BOMBSHELL: Obama, his CIA director James Brennan “WEAPONIZED” intel against Trump to give Hillary the White House

Huge story, broken by Circa News, capsulized by  The New York Post has the information.

New revelations have surfaced that the Obama administration abused intelligence during the election by launching a massive domestic spy campaign that included snooping on Trump officials.

The irony is mind-boggling: Targeting political opposition is long a technique of police states like Russia, which Team Obama has loudly condemned for allegedly using its own intelligence agencies to hack into our election. 

The revelations, as well as testimony this week from former Obama intel officials, show the extent to which the Obama administration politicized and weaponized intelligence against Americans. 

Thanks to Circa News, we now know the National Security Agency under President Barack Obama routinely violated privacy protections while snooping through foreign intercepts involving US citizens — and failed to disclose the breaches, prompting the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court a month before the election to rebuke administration officials.

So as we see there was election interference, but not from the Trump campaign, but from Hillary's buddy Obama.  It's been recently learned that the Obama administration collected information (spied on), without proper FISA authorization, and only told the court in Oct of  2016.  The were abruptly chastised by the court for obvious violations of  Americans 4th Amendment rights.

More,

Under congressional questioning Tuesday, Obama’s CIA chief John Brennan said the dossier did not “in any way” factor into the agency’s assessment that Russia interfered in the election. Why not? Because as Obama intel czar James Clapper earlier testified, “We could not corroborate the sourcing.” 

But that didn’t stop Brennan in January from attaching its contents to the official report for the president. He also included the unverified allegations in the briefing he gave Hill Democrats. 

In so doing, Brennan virtually guaranteed that it would be leaked, which it promptly was.
In short, Brennan politicized raw intelligence. In fact, he politicized the entire CIA.
Langley vets say Brennan was the most politicized director in the agency’s history. Former CIA field-operations officer Gene Coyle said Brennan was “known as the greatest sycophant in the history of the CIA, and a supporter of Hillary Clinton before the election. I find it hard to put any real credence in anything that the man says.”
Coyle noted that Brennan broke with his predecessors who stayed out of elections. 

Several weeks before the vote, he made it very clear he was pulling for Hillary. His deputy Mike Morell even came out and publicly endorsed her in The New York Times, claiming Trump was an “unwitting agent” of Moscow. 

Brennan isn’t just a Democrat. He’s a radical leftist who in 1980 — during the height of the Cold War — voted for a Communist Party candidate for president.

So basically what you have is a concentrated effort by the former administration and the CIA trying to kneecap Trump to give Hillary the White House.  Thankfully they underestimated the power of the American people, who voted for and gave Trump the White House instead.

James Comey behind Leak of Jared Kushner story to Washington Post

As the Washington Post breathlessly reported about Kushner's contacts with Russia the question that comes to mind "Who leaked this?"

I have my own sources within the FBI as a former spook so I made a call to inquire.  All I got was, "Past Cork base boss". That's an old code word for the FBI director that was used many years ago, but because I have been out of service, he knew I would get it.  That would have been James Comey, former FBI director.   As a side note there are many agents who are not at all unhappy that their former boss was gone.  But one is particularly unhappy and plans to come forward in the future.

The Washington Post puts the info sourcing "US officials briefed on intelligence reports", which is utter nonsense.

James Comey has been blatantly carrying on his own private coup against Trump since the election cycle, first by refusing to charge Hillary Clinton with crimes that that would have put anyone else in the clink.  Agents working at the bureau were frustrated that after all the man hours put on that case they were told that nothing was there when in fact they found plenty.

Second, this information has been known since at least December by the FBI, only now has the media picked it up, and again by "anonymous source".   Earlier this week Comey cancelled his appointment to testify to congress in order to visit with his old friend and predecessor as well as now Special Counsel Robert Mueller, I guess for tea and guidance.

As you know formerly Comey leaked the idea of his memo to the press yet as to this date no memo has been produced.  Even if it was it would be considered hearsay in a court of law because it would be Trump's word against his.  Additionally even if true Trump would have done nothing wrong as it's no crime to ask.  No where does anyone say Trump ordered Comey to drop the investigation.

But a leak, especially during a Special Counsel investigation could be troublesome for Comey as it, unless he is called as a witness, could be viewed as obstruction of justice.  Mueller cannot play favoritism at this point which is why I've been on Twitter calling for him to recuse himself.


More on this to come.

WAPO: Russian ambassador told Moscow that Kushner wanted secret communications channel with Kremlin

They must have these non-stories in a cue.

Jared Kushner and Russia’s ambassador to Washington discussed the possibility of setting up a secret and secure communications channel between Trump’s transition team and the Kremlin, using Russian diplomatic facilities in an apparent move to shield their pre-inauguration discussions from monitoring, according to U.S. officials briefed on intelligence reports.
Ambassador Sergey Kislyak reported to his superiors in Moscow that Kushner, son-in-law and confidant to then-President-elect Trump, made the proposal during a meeting on Dec. 1 or 2 at Trump Tower, according to intercepts of Russian communications that were reviewed by U.S. officials. Kislyak said Kushner suggested using Russian diplomatic facilities in the United States for the communications.
The meeting also was attended by Michael Flynn, Trump’s first national security adviser.
The White House disclosed the meeting only in March, playing down its significance. But people familiar with the matter say the FBI now considers the encounter, as well as another meeting Kushner had with a Russian banker, to be of investigative interest. 

I'll bet they do, especially after Comey was fired.  This is non-news because every administration going back to JFK has set up backdoor channels, but recently Barack Obama during the very same thing during his 2008 campaign.

 All administrations have thought to establish channels the spooks wouldn't even know about because of the volatile nature of their activities.

So while it appears a "Bombshell" as Drudge posts, it's anything but.  Just another leak to the WAPO who seems to only release them on Monday's or Friday, so as to have a greater effect.