Sunday, April 30, 2006


Rockefeller did you "teller?"- XIX- The "Get Goss" plan won't work

To answer the question some people have about where this story is a plan to "Get back at Goss", my answer is - mostly likely is, but it doesn't really matter. Goss is merely swinging the broom according to the mandate that he was given by the Administration to "clean house". So no matter who is on the job - the job is going to get done.

But I fully expect a "push back" In fact as the current set of investigations going begin to come to conclusion, I expect quite a bit of push back as the rats get cornered. It's none too soon either.

Iran is flaunting it's ass big time and it looks like Israel just might take that potshot at Iran after all - especially after taking some new pictures.

Fact is that the house cleaning needs to get completed, and as well the rogues that have been identified need to be dealt with. We need the good guys and gals of intel left to help us make the current crisis in order.

This goes as well for the rogues in the house and senate. A group of malcontents which is getting larger by the minute as one rats on another.

And this story, from back in 2005 is gaining a bit of traction.

Let's not forget the most important hypocrisy of Senator Rocky is that for the last three years he has been touted as the chief war critic when in fact he was the greatest proponent of a war with Iraq UNTIL George W. Bush decided to go in.

Again, to Senator "Syria", his anger isn't "righteous judgement", it's entirely PERSONAL and it's why he wrote the planto "Get Bush" from the outset.

UPDATE: Tell the WAPO that attacking the machine won't work either. (Making the case for an early defense for Dana Priest).


Rockefeller did you "teller" - XVIII - The Clear Picture

Keep talking Colin.

"Former Secretary of State Colin Powell advised President Bush before the Iraq war to send more troops to the country, but the administration did not follow his recommendation, Powell said in an interview broadcast Sunday.

Critics accuse Bush and Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld of failing to send enough soldiers to secure the peace in Iraq after the invasion three years ago.

Powell said he gave the advice to now retired Gen. Tommy Franks, who developed and executed the Iraq invasion plan, and Rumsfeld while the president was present.

"I made the case to Gen. Franks and Secretary Rumsfeld before the president that I was not sure we had enough troops," Powell said in an interview on Britain's ITV television, according to a transcript released by the network. "The case was made, it was listened to, it was considered. ... A judgment was made by those responsible that the troop strength was adequate."

Powell, who served as chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff during the 1991 Gulf War, is known for his belief in deploying decisive force with a clear exit strategy in any conflict.

"The president's military advisers felt that the size of the force was adequate, they may still feel that years later. Some of us don't, I don't," Powell said. "In my perspective, I would have preferred more troops but you know, this conflict is not over."

"At the time the president was listening to those who were supposed to be providing him with military advice," Powell said. "They were anticipating a different kind of immediate aftermath of the fall of Baghdad, it turned out to be not exactly as they had anticipated."

Rumsfeld has rejected criticism that he had sent too few U.S. troops to Iraq, saying that Franks and two other generals who oversaw the campaign's planning — John Abizaid and George Casey — had determined the overall number of troops, and that he and Bush agreed with them."

Powell was the lone ranger and now he can sit back and point fingers. It's also funny how Powell always seems to get interviewed whenever there is anantiwar protest. Who is his press agent - Cindy Sheehan?

State Department (don't get me started).

But Powell gave his two cents and was outvoted.

Of course that gives fuel to the 'critics' (that MSM talk for REPORTERS) about the insurgency, which the premise that many of them entered Iraq AFTER the fall of Saddam simply isn't true. Many of the insurgency leaders and their teams were in Iraq long BEFORE we invaded. Doing what? TRAINING and WAITING.

Yeah, they knew we were coming for a least a year before it happened. After all they had plenty of warning we were coming.

is the picture becoming clearer now?

Salman Pak wasn't an amusement park ya know!

People forget that the way we so quickly got to Baghdad seemed a lot like the story of a police raid where the cops break down the door with guns bared and no one is there. Causing them to conclude, "Someone tipped the crooks?", only then to find they walked into an ambush as the building blows up.

And who's just was it to ensure that the place was properly scouted out before the guns arrived? Yeah, the surveillance guys and gals.

Who's job was it to make sure we had the RIGHT info on Iraq?

Tip: It starts with "C" and ends with an "A", and to repeat what "International man of Mystery" sat then and sits now on the Senate Intelligence Committee?

How about it now - is the picture REAL clear?

If Powell isn't careful he may give alway the whole game. In that respect I hope he keeps yakking.

Who is zooming who?

Saturday, April 29, 2006


It's a fact: Conservatives give better mug shots

I was out yesterday after noon and "off the air" for most of the night. Woke this morning to the MSM panting over Rush Limbaugh's so-called 'arrest'.

Well, actually he just went to get a mug shot, and bond out. The prosecutor here in Palm Beach is a dolt and couldn't get a case because HE NEVER HAD ONE. "Doctor shopping".....

Right. In Democratically controlled socialite Palm Beach Florida. Right! Get the paddy wagon and lock up the entire senior community if that is a real crime.

But after monday it's over as Rush will go back to 20 million plus listeners a day, and the Palm Beach State Attorney will get a book deal.

However, I did notice Rush's 'mug shot'. And making comparisons between arrested Demorats (who on average over the years have had more mug shots), and Conservatives, the latter definitely look a lot less threatening.

For instance, here is Rush's shot:

Tom Delay:

Now for some democrats


Gainsville, Fla., Democrat David P. McCally

By the way....James Brown (King of Soul) ...yep, Democrat


More mugshots of demorcats here.

More to come here, and here

UPDATE: DNC through their press office the AP responds..

Friday, April 28, 2006


More unbalanced banter from the MSM

And they wonder why no on is paying attention and they're losing money. No, not California, but how they jump to trash a trumped up story of the only successful Governor of hurricane Katrina, Haley Barbour.

"WASHINGTON - Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour, a former Republican Party chairman, arranged the startup financing for a GOP telemarketing company implicated in two criminal cases involving election dirty tricks.

Virginia corporation records show Barbour's investment company arranged a quarter-million dollar loan to GOP Marketplace in 2000 and also gave a promotional plug to the telemarketer several months later.

A spokesman for the governor said Barbour had no idea the company would engage in criminal activity two years later. The lawyer for the now-defunct company's convicted president said Barbour was not consulted about its operations."

Like I used to say on the police force, "Nothing to see here - move along.."

You know - lies, damn lies and the real under reported story of true corruption which is the State of Louisiana.

I do wonder why the Associated Depressed seems unimpressed with the story of U.S. Rep. Bill Jefferson? Oh yeah, he's a democrat.

Filed under

Boycott ME? Boycott YOU!

In the spirit of Latinos boycotting us on May 1st, I submit that we "anglos" and other NON-Latinos boycott initiate boycott LATINO day.

1. Burn any Latino Music CD you own, email Latin music labels and tell them that because their artist don't support you, you will not support them any longer.

2. Boycott for 30 days any product of Mexico or other Latin Country, most of it isn't worth it anyway.

3. Print flyers stating for your community to boycott all latino businesses in your home town. When they bring their boycotting butts back to work on May 2nd, let them find no customers to buy their wares.

4. If you have Latino employees (legal or otherwise), and they walk on Monday, make it permanent. If you are in a right to work state like Florida, you can legally fire them without cause.

More suggestions coming...

So let the word out. Spread it to blogs. Someone create a logo, let's get a move on.

Boycott ME? Boycott YOU!

Visit Michelle Malkin for more.


The MSM doesn't want you to remember United 93

Just as I mentioned here, today's release of the movie United 93 is the worst thing for the leftist MSM. For five years the media has tried to erase 9/11, or reinvent it into some isolated incident, if for no other reason than in the aftermath President Bush's true legacy was defined. But moreover it reminds us that we are in a war with lslamic extremist who want us destroyed and that the GWOT is valid and worth fighting. That is anathema to the MSM.

So on the day that the movie is released the Washington Post predictably comes foward with their bucket of water to slander the intent and motive of the movie.

"United 93," Hollywood's first big-budget film about the events of Sept. 11, 2001, is faithful to the major aspects of the tragic morning it depicts. The movie tracks the key events detailed in the 9/11 Commission Report, the most definitive source on the subject: the commandeering of the United jet by four terrorists, the panic of the passengers and the heroic rebellion that ended with the plane crashing in a field near Shanksville, Pa.

But the movie, which opens nationwide today, is a dramatic re-creation that includes scenes and images that go far beyond what is known about the attacks.

Those scenes raise questions: How far can a dramatic movie go in imposing its own reality before it distorts the public's understanding of the event? And with memories of 9/11 still vivid and raw, is it too soon for such films to be made?"

No, it's not. We should see it every day.

Two years ago the MSM toasted liar Michael Moore and his Fahrenheit 9/11 with interviews and documentaries. Even in some cases reporting the news as if it came directly from that totally and utterly debunked tripe. But Moore bashed Bush and that is an acceptable trade of fact for the MSM.

That which does not hold Bush in a bad light cannot stand. It must be mocked and discredited.

Go see this movie. Remember the bravery and sacrifice of those who gave all. Their spirit lives in the soul of every true American. Let those who would have us sympathize and coddle the cowardly Muslim scum who seek our annihilation be damned. Honor the memory of United 93 and all those who gave their life on that day by supporting this movie.

UPDATE: NRO's Rich Lowry's take - amen.

Thursday, April 27, 2006


White House Press Corps Temper Tantrum

Michelle Malkin with the hilarious Q/A session from the White House primadona corps complaining about their perception that the White House TV's are tuned constantly to Fox News.

Via Michelle here is the transcript.

"Q It's come to my attention that there's been requests -- this is a serious question -- to turn these TVs onto a station other than Fox, and that those have been denied. My question would be, is there a White House policy that all government TVs have to be tuned to Fox?

MR. McCLELLAN: Never heard of any such thing. My TVs are on four
different channels at all times.

Q Because you have four different TVs. But every time I've ever been --

MR. McCLELLAN: Every TV in the White House also has channels every --
has a split screen, where they can --

Q Well, they always seem to be tuned to Fox, and there's been requests,
and these are paid for by taxpayer dollars. And my understanding is that
you guys have to watch Fox on Air Force One. Is that true?

MR. McCLELLAN: First time I've ever heard of it. First time you've
brought it to my attention, meaning the first time the press corps has
brought it to my attention. In fact, I've watched other channels on here.

Q There's one --

MR. McCLELLAN: Hang on, Jim, come on. I've watched other channels on
here, so I don't know where you're hearing that. But it's the first time
anyone in the press has raised that question with me.

Q You've watched other channels other than Fox?

MR. McCLELLAN: On here, yes, sure.

Q I've never seen -- they're always turned to Fox, which a lot of people
consider a Republican-leaning network.

Q Scott, is it one -- on the airplane, is it one for all? I mean, if
it's tuned for Fox here, is it Fox everywhere?

MR. McCLELLAN: I think that certain areas may be interconnected, but
I'll have to double-check which.

Q Is yours off, wherever you are?

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, the conference room, or the senior staff office,
the staff office, they're different TVs, and you can switch to different
channels. I'm not sure if some of these in the back are connected to
some of the others that are watching right here, right now. It doesn't
look like it to me. I've never known anyone that's raised a complaint
about a request from back here to watch a different channel.

Q I'm officially raising it and officially complaining about it.

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, I'm going to go see if we can change the channel
for you. Have you called up?

Q I was the Fox victim, and I was told -- the quote was, "No," when I
asked for CNN.

MR. McCLELLAN: I don't know who you talked to, so -- it didn't come to
my attention. You don't know who you talked to either?

Q Well, the magic people at the other end off the phone.

MR. McCLELLAN: The magic people at the other end of the phone. Well,
I'll see if this cabin is --

Q I was told, "We don't watch CNN here, you can only watch Fox."

MR. McCLELLAN: As I said, it's hard to respond to something when I don't
know who it is you talked to.

Q I used the phone back here.

MR. McCLELLAN: I find this all quite amusing, to tell you the truth. I
mean, there are a lot of people on this plane that do watch that channel.

Q I've never been told, no. They're such nice guys up there.

MR. McCLELLAN: First time you brought it to my attention. I'll go see
what we can do on it.

* * * * *

MR. McCLELLAN: We just called up. They're going to be changing it, at
your all's request, to the channel that you requested, which is CNN --
from the press corps.

Q Thanks, Scott."

Are you sh-ting me? Where was this clown during the Clinton Administration when CNN was coined at the "Clinton News Network"? Maybe the White House doesn't want to watch a network that made a deal with the devil, just for ratings.

Fact is that this is no doubt due to Fox News' Tony Snow coming on board and show the utter sophmoronic childishness of the White House prima-dona corp is.

I'm telling you folks, the Driveby Media is losing it - quicker than a three-legged dog on an ice pond.


Rockefeller did you "teller" - XVII - Profit under the Palms

The most excellent Douglas Hanson of American Thinker reinforces the theme of my previous post with an article that shows that the war against Bush isn't about just a difference of opinion.

"There have been many indicators since the Iraq War started that the CIA’s internal war against the administration is much more than ideological. For some in the CIA, the Global War on Terror is not just about the struggle for democracy and freedom to protect our national interest."

Since last year when I got into the Plame Game and began to contact people back at the farm about what in the heck was going on I was told that this whole thing was much more than met the eyes. Again, supporting the Iraq regime made a lot of people very wealthy. Small wonder that so many "ideologs" have been in opposition, less of a wonder why they are running so scared now.

I can't tire of telling you how important it is that Mary Loose Lips has been brought down. More than just a random 'discovery' - she is the key to the lock. Guys at the agency and the DOJ knew exactly where to target - and they hit it dead on. In the coming days you will see why Senator Rockefeller HAD to make such an emergency visit to Syria in 2002. For a little tip, read here.

Read Doug's article, and remember - "Bang of a Summer."

UPDATE: Sorry for the link to the Italian news article - old link in a spreadsheet. Anyway, good old AJ did some of the footwork, so check out his take . His summation is correct. Also I located this post from FR with this chart that positions things nicely.

A little more insight to the Rocky Factor is contained here.

Now you know why Rockefeller - "teller".

UPDATE II: Clarice Feldman's American Thinker article from December of 2005, with additional background and definitely worth a read as well.

Which reminds me to give thanks for the wealth of work others have done along with myself to uncover the truth about what these traitors to our country have been pulling on the American people over years. Keep up the faith and the hardwork!


Ex-OP BS story REHASH with Eggs

Getting a few emails on my take on Tyler (Tiny) Drumheller's interview on 60 Minutes sunday night.

My take? old news, and not even fair and balanced this time around.

This is the old rehash from last year about Curveball and how the intel community - well, actually the rogue members of it - 'warned' the administration about his credibility. It's important to remember that there were IC members who didn't feel that way.

But if first you don't succeed. You see the MSM believes we're stupid and have small attention spans. Plus tiny has a book out. How surprising?

Fact is that that the doors are coming off the traitor express that these clowns have been riding the last four years.

Make no mistake, Porter isn't playing around and the mandate he has is at any cost - "Bring them in, bring them down". McCarthy is the beginning. Regardless of what you hear, charges will be brought against her. Which is why soon after her lawyer appeared trying to reverse history, she has begun to lay low.

Expect to see these criminals redouble their efforts to the extreme from here on out. Rehashing old stories - most debunked - and talking crazy like McGovern who is three fries short of a Happy Meal. It's going to be very entertaining to see them squirming and allegating and bloviating and frothing, just like an animal in it's death throws.

Folks the key to understanding this tale is the same old motive that drives most crime, "Money and Power". This "war" against this administration from the beginning has been all about regaining power and keeping illicit avenues of money flowing to the pockets of both corrupt politicians, as well as some both active and former ops (see here). Which is why I told you back here that's the reason that to them Bush has to go because he killed the Golden Goose.

But the push back is in full swing and when it's said and done and the soon to be coming frog marches of politicians, rogue ops, media figures, parade across our TV screens the American people are going to be shocked and awed that they have believed lie all this time. Moreover, that they were lied to by the "trusted" MSM who knew the true story all along.

My what a tangled web......


Rockefeller did you "teller" - XVI - The long arm of the law

Yesterday's passage of a Intelligence Spending bill, by the house spells the end of the "loose lip" rogue ops who exist only to blab secrets to the media and undermine our country - at least if they want to keep their pension checks.

"The bill would require Negroponte to study administrative punishments for government employees who leaked classified information, including revocation of their pensions.

Renzi offered a resolution that condemns media organizations that profit from disclosures and calls on the president to use his constitutional powers to act against leakers of classified information. The resolution, the kind Congress uses to express an opinion on an issue, made no substantive or practical changes to current law. It passed 366-56.

Renzi said the resolution sends a message that former government employees or those soon to retire would be prosecuted for leaks. He said media organizations should help "safeguard the nation's secrets" during the terror war.

"It is never in our nation's best interest to disclose our most sensitive intelligence sources and methods to our enemies," Renzi said in a statement.

The resolution probably won't make much difference in how reporters handle sensitive information, though.

"I think it is obnoxious, but I don't think it will have much of an impact," said Lucy Dalglish, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press."

But in addition the bill would allow the agency to persue those ops even if they retired, with prosecution and revocation of pensions and benefits. Which is why the agency issued a warning to those ex ops who just can't resist talking to the WAPO, Times, and other rags.

Kit gloves are off - like Rambo, "We're coming after you!"

Yep, turning out to be a real HOT summer some people - real hot!

UPDATE: Reader Carol note that 56 Democrats voted against this bill. Yeah, "Party of Treason" ...who would have thunk it?

Wednesday, April 26, 2006


Plame Game - MSM Wagging the Dog


MSM is panting over this report about Karl and his fifth appearance to the Fitz-Fizz party.

"WASHINGTON - Top White House aide Karl Rove prepared to testify Wednesday for a fifth time before the federal grand jury investigating the leak of a CIA officer’s identity, a person familiar with the case told NBC News.

Rove consulted with his private lawyers before a scheduled afternoon court appearance and was prepared to answer questions about evidence that emerged since his last grand jury appearance last fall, the person said, speaking only on condition of anonymity because of grand jury secrecy rules.

That new evidence includes information that emerged late last year that Rove’s attorney, Robert Luskin, had conversations with Time magazine reporter Viveca Novak during a critical time in the case."

The operative word here is "scheduled". This has been on the docket for a while now. Loose ends that's all. And the kicker? The media knew about this for a quite a while - it's hardly newsworthy.

In fact I wouldn't be a bit suprised if this wasn't a bit of "wag the dog" by the MSM to take the attention off the growing Mary Loose Lips story.

Ought to be, the Plame Game is done.

UPDATE: Per York at NRO, Rove not a target - as I told you.

"Karl Rove has finished testifying before prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald's CIA leak investigation grand jury. After the appearance, Rove lawyer Robert Luskin issued a statement:

Karl Rove appeared today before the grand jury investigating the disclosure of a CIA agent's identity. He testified voluntarily and unconditionally at the request of special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald to explore a matter raised since Mr. Rove's last appearance in October 2005. In connection with this appearance, the special counsel has advised Mr. Rove that he is not a target of the investigation. Mr. Fitzgerald has affirmed that he has made no decisions regarding charges. At the request of the special counsel, Mr. Rove will not discuss the substance of his testimony."

Tip: This one is bad news for certian media types.

(Paging Matt Cooper....Mr. Cooper???)

Powered by Blogger.


Total Pageviews

Search This Blog

Blog Archive



Pages - Menu

Macsmind - Official Blog of The MacRanger Show on Blog Talk Radio


Go here.