Wednesday, September 30, 2009


Talk of Revolution Grows

You can't call everyone a nut just because they speak of a government overthrow.   Lots of bloggers sniffing at this from Newsmax,  which has been removed, but speaks of a possible military overthrow.
There is a remote, although gaining, possibility America's military will intervene as a last resort to resolve the "Obama problem." Don't dismiss it as unrealistic. America isn’t the Third World. If a military coup does occur here it will be civilized. That it has never happened doesn't mean it wont. Describing what may be afoot is not to advocate it. So, view the following through military eyes: Officers swear to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic." Unlike enlisted personnel, they do not swear to "obey the orders of the president of the United States." Top military officers can see the Constitution they are sworn to defend being trampled as American institutions and enterprises are nationalized. They can see that Americans are increasingly alarmed that this nation, under President Barack Obama, may not even be recognizable as America by the 2012 election, in which he will surely seek continuation in office. They can see that the economy — ravaged by deficits, taxes, unemployment, and impending inflation — is financially reliant on foreign lender governments. They can see this president waging undeclared war on the intelligence community, without whose rigorous and independent functions the armed services are rendered blind in an ever-more hostile world overseas and at home. They can see the dismantling of defenses against missiles targeted at this nation by avowed enemies, even as America’s troop strength is allowed to sag. They can see the horror of major warfare erupting simultaneously in two, and possibly three, far-flung theaters before America can react in time. They can see the nation's safety and their own military establishments and honor placed in jeopardy as never before. So, if you are one of those observant military professionals, what do you do? Wait until this president bungles into losing the war in Afghanistan, and Pakistan’s arsenal of nuclear bombs falls into the hands of militant Islam? Wait until Israel is forced to launch air strikes on Iran’s nuclear-bomb plants, and the Middle East explodes, destabilizing or subjugating the Free World? What happens if the generals Obama sent to win the Afghan war are told by this president (who now says, "I'm not interested in victory") that they will be denied troops they must have to win? Do they follow orders they cannot carry out, consistent with their oath of duty? Do they resign en masse? Or do they soldier on, hoping the 2010 congressional elections will reverse the situation? Do they dare gamble the national survival on such political whims? Anyone who imagines that those thoughts are not weighing heavily on the intellect and conscience of America’s military leadership is lost in a fool's fog. Will the day come when patriotic general and flag officers sit down with the president, or with those who control him, and work out the national equivalent of a "family intervention," with some form of limited, shared responsibility? Imagine a bloodless coup to restore and defend the Constitution through an interim administration that would do the serious business of governing and defending the nation. Skilled, military-trained, nation-builders would replace accountability-challenged, radical-left commissars. Having bonded with his twin teleprompters, the president would be detailed for ceremonial speech-making. Military intervention is what Obama's exponentially accelerating agenda for "fundamental change" toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup is not an ideal option, but Obama's radical ideal is not acceptable or reversible. Unthinkable? Then think up an alternative, non-violent solution to the Obama problem. Just don't shrug and say, "We can always worry about that later." In the 2008 election, that was the wistful, self-indulgent, indifferent reliance on abnegation of personal responsibility that has sunk the nation into this morass."
John Perry isn't a nutbag. He's a distinguished writer and solid individual who worked for two Presidents. So calling him a nut is ridiculous.

 Perry is only one of a growing list of writers and thinkers who are coming to the same conclusion. Even uber lefty Gore Vidal has echoed the same warning.

 I don't agree with Vidal's views from the left field, but he's hardly a nut. Back in 2004 Salon published an almost duplicate theme in this article citing a possible revolt of the military against Bush, so this idea isn't new.

 Indeed in 1998 67 high ranking officers resigned over Clinton policies, and it was during the Clinton administration when the "coup chatter" was at it's zenith.

 Fact is that that what Perry references is already being echoed throughout military circles. The idea that this country with it's great constitutional principles is somehow immune from an overthrow is absurd.

Obama is scaring he hell out of folks from the Pentagon to the CIA, to the halls of Congress, the Senate, and the American people,  as no other President has ever done. Ignoring that fact will not make it go away. It's here to stay and growing.

Tuesday, September 29, 2009


Hollywood Supports Child Rapist Roman Polanski

It doesn't make a difference how long ago it was, or even if the girl forgives him.  When you rape a 13 year old girl anally after drugging her you need to be put away for life.

That Hollywood would stand behind Polanski speaks volumes about how they feel about the rightness of rape.  As such perhaps we should remember that before we buy a ticket to one of their movies or shows.

For perspective Patterico has a description of the rape (graphic), so you can get a real idea about what Hollywood is standing behind.

Saturday, September 26, 2009


Fail to Buy Insurance under Obamacare could get you thrown in Jail

Can mandated "anything" be far behind in the New United States?

"Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) received a handwritten note Thursday from Joint Committee on Taxation Chief of Staff Tom Barthold confirming the penalty for failing to pay the up to $1,900 fee for not buying health insurance.
Violators could be charged with a misdemeanor and could face up to a year in jail or a $25,000 penalty, Barthold wrote on JCT letterhead. He signed it "Sincerely, Thomas A. Barthold."

Which is why I'm calling November 4th, 2010 and 2010 two days of revolution.  Either the American people vote Barack Obama and his socialists friends out of office, or get ready to bow to the dear leader.

The choice is ours.  I for one will not bow.

Bill Sparkman was a Republican

Not that it would matter to the jump-to-anything-bad-that-happens-is-a-rightwing-conspiracy, but it's a fact. Clay County is solid Republican, via Wiki:
The county has been solidly Republican for decades. In the last 16 years the only Republican to receive less than 60% was Bob Dole, who still won the county by nearly 25%. In 2008 John McCain received 77.5% of the vote.
But another fact is that he wasn't killed because he was a census worker.

  The hanging of Bill Sparkman according to two sources within the KBI,  Sparkman stumbled onto a meth lab and was killed because "that's what they do with you when you're in the wrong place.

 Big Creek, where Sparkman was killed, is on the Kentucky State Police's list for meth labs, and in fact the address of the lab, 5693 S. Hwy 66 in Big Creek, isn't far from where he was found.

 In fact Clay County is infested with with an abundance of meth labs and marijuana fields, and it's amazing that the Census Bureau would not have warned Sparkman of the dangers of the area.

 We'll know once the investigation is complete, but right now it appears that Spearman was killed by drug dealers. If anyone has questions to answer, it should be why the Census Bureau sends it's workers into such areas without warning.

Thursday, September 24, 2009


Let's Ramp up Investigation into all the Organizations of the Left

As expected John Podesta being appointed to look into ACORN's corruption is about as worthless as screen doors on a submarine. His Center for Communist  American Progress is all about blaming the right, when the problems with ACORN have originated and continue with the philosophy of the left.

But why stop with ACORN?  That Podesta, who ran Barack Obama's transition team, is in charge in looking into ACORN's (who Obama used to lawyer for) activities is outrageous if not an insult to the taxpayers of America.

Indeed the Center for American Progress has it's own shady past, being conceived through meetings between communist,  Morton Halperin and Nazi Sympathizer George Soros.  Halperin is also a senior advisor in Soro's Open Society Institute.   Here's a map of his associations:

From this organization came CAP's chief propaganda wing Media Matters.

A huge part of CAP's funding comes from the Democracy Alliance, a group of some 80 wealthy liberals who have pledged to contribute at least one million dollars or more to fund a network to go against what they call a conservative juggernaut .

Most of the donors prefer anonymity, but we prefer to have transparency, so it would be good to get a list of these donors.

Some of the DA members are:

Interesting enough that the SEIU appears in the list, as they have a huge stake in Obamacare.   The point is that when you begin to look at the connections you see that in one way or another they all land at Obama's doorstep and that is indeed where we intend to go.   But to get there we have to get there one corrupt organization at a time.

Wednesday, September 23, 2009


ACORN Takes Out You Know What and Cuts it Off - Files Lawsuit Against Filmakers who Uncovered their Corruption

"ACORN filed suit today in Maryland against conservative filmmakers James O’Keefe, Hannah Giles and conservative Web site for secretly taping the organization’s employees at its Baltimore office. In the complaint, ACORN alleges that the filmmakers entered into the organization’s offices in July with a “hidden camera and microphone” and taped employees Tonja Thompson and Shera Williams. Both employees are listed as plaintiffs on the complaint, filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. The crux of the lawsuit centers around a Maryland law which makes it illegal to tape someone without their consent – ACORN is alleging O’Keefe and Giles did so. ACORN is asking for $500,000 in damages to be awarded to each of the employees filmed by O'Keefe and Giles, and ACORN itself wants $1 million in damages."
You'll remember back in the 90s Food Lion sued ABC news over a report and won 5 million dollars, but it was later reduced to two bucks. In other words it was laughed out of court

In any case a civil suit will have no real standing with someone first filing a criminal complaint. The Baltimore City State's Attorney's Office was saying last week that it might make such charges. If the State of Maryland wants to charge the filmakers have at it, but it's unlikely to succeed if they do. Linda Tripp of Clinton fame was charged with the same law for tapping her conversations with Monica Lewinsky, but the case didn't go forward. Reason? The law is murky.

 Fact is that it doesn't apply in this case.
Maryland law states the following verbatim: Unlawful acts. -- Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle it is unlawful for any person to: (1) Willfully intercept, endeavor to intercept, or procure any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication; (2) Willfully disclose, or endeavor to disclose, to any other person the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication in violation of this subtitle; or (3) Willfully use, or endeavor to use, the contents of any wire, oral, or electronic communication, knowing or having reason to know that the information was obtained through the interception of a wire, oral, or electronic communication in violation of this subtitle. Cts. & Jud. Proc. §10-402(a)(1)-(a)(3). (emphasis added) Nowhere in the law are the words "tape" or "record" ever used.
This is nothing more than a hissy fit by an organization full of corruption and scandal. This move and the resulting discovery will only further cement that fact in the minds of the American people. Michelle Malkin: "Shoot the messenger. Sue the messenger: It’s the ACORN way." Exactly.

Sarah Palin Wows Them in Hong Kong

By all accounts a great speech!
"A number of people who heard the speech in a packed hotel ballroom, which was closed to the media, said Mrs. Palin spoke from notes for 90 minutes and that she was articulate, well-prepared and even compelling. “The speech was wide-ranging, very balanced, and she beat all expectations,” said Doug A. Coulter, head of private equity in the Asia-Pacific region for LGT Capital Partners. “She didn’t sound at all like a far-right-wing conservative. She seemed to be positioning herself as a libertarian or a small-c conservative,” he said, adding that she mentioned both Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. “She brought up both those names.” ..Mr. Goodé, an African-American who said he did some campaign polling for President Obama, said Mrs. Palin mentioned President Obama three times on Wednesday. “And there was nothing derogatory in it, no sleight of hand, and believe me, I was listening for that,” he said, adding that Mrs. Palin referred to Mr. Obama as “our president,” with the emphasis on “our.” Mr. Goodé, a New Yorker who said he would never vote for Mrs. Palin, said she acquitted herself well. “They really prepared her well,” he said. “She was articulate and she held her own. I give her credit. They’ve tried to categorize her as not being bright. She’s bright.”
Way to knock it out of the Park Sarah, good job!

Secretary General Obama

Missed his calling.
"Simply put, Barack Obama is loved at the UN because he largely fails to advance real American leadership. This is a dangerous strategy of decline that will weaken US power and make her far more vulnerable to attack."
"And, frankly, he fits there much better than he does here, because the UN is a palace of speeches with little or no action. It is becoming clear to many of us that the proper job for Barack Obama isn’t President of the United States, where you’re actually expected to turn your speeches into action, but Secretary General of the UN, where speechifying is the ultimate action – well, that and spending donor money, covering up for peacekeepers who rape those they’re there to protect or “oil for food” and type scandals, and generally denouncing the UN’s host country."

Tuesday, September 22, 2009


Spooky Crazy Woman who thinks Obama is the Messiah Tries to Corner Eric Cantor on Healthcare

Media Matters (That George Soros Place), is at it again.

"Cantor, who serves as the chief whip for his party, has said that he cannot support a health reform bill with a public option. But despite his political opposition to government insurance programs, Cantor then emphasized to Churchill that every American should be given an “option” for health care, including a government program:
CHURCHILL: I have a very close relative, a woman in her early forties, who did have a wonderful, high-paying job, owns her own home and is a real contributing member of society. She lost her job. Just a couple of weeks ago, she found out that she has tumors in her belly and that she needs an operation. Her doctors told her that they are growing and that she needs to get this operation quickly. She has no insurance.
[...] CANTOR: First of all I guess I would ask what the situation is in terms of income eligibility and the existing programs that are out there. Because if we look at the uninsured that are out there right now, there is probably 23, 24% of the uninsured that is already eligible for an existing government program [...] Beyond that, I know that there are programs, there are charitable organizations, there are hospitals here who do provide charity care if there’s an instance of indigency and the individual is not eligible for existing programs that there can be some cooperative effort. No one in this country, given who we are, should be sitting without an option to be addressed."

 So who is Churchill?

Well,  here's her site, "Sounds of Wisdom", which is chocked full of "positive thinking" and "affirmations" which are buzzwords of the the crowd that thinks that sickness is a result of negative thinking. She describes herself as a "spiritual life coach". A quote:
" How should we handle the negative stuff that stubbornly hangs on, pulling us into the same old habits, attitudes and results day after day? We need to release and dissolve toxic thinking in order to free ourselves. We can start with an affirmation like “I now release and dissolve any idea that I ________ (can’t afford to go to college; have to live in lack and limitation; must go to my parents’ church; can’t find a husband; don’t have much chance of getting a good job; am stuck in this neighborhood). I erase that idea completely. I am now free to _________. I achieve my goal easily and effortlessly when I follow Divine guidance. Thank you, God, for guiding me to the highest and best outcome.” Release the fear thoughts and claim what you want! Then, turn it over to God and leave it there. This works!"
Ok, so if her relative has all these medical issues why not have her practice what Patricia is preaching?

But wait, it gets better, and even more spooky.  Here is Churchill describing the "spiritual origin" of Barack Obama, describing him as some kind of "messiah!


So why not have THE ONE touch her and be healed?


The Corruption in ACORN has No Peer

Lefties are trying to make it appear that it's not only ACORN who wears the badge of corruption among other government funded organizations.
"Last week, the House and Senate voted to prohibit the federal government from awarding contracts and grants to the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), a national network of community-based organizations that advocate for low-income families.
Congress rushed to cut off all federal funding to ACORN days after several ACORN employees were caught on camera giving advice to a couple posing as a prostitute and a pimp on ways to evade the law. The House’s bill is called the “Defund ACORN Act”. The bill specifically targets ACORN, but it also applies to “any organization” or its employees who are charged with violating federal or state election, campaign finance or lobbying disclosure laws or filing a fraudulent form with any federal or state regulatory agency. Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL) is particularly interested in the fraud provision.
Recognizing that there are probably worse offenders than ACORN in this area, Grayson is looking for help in coming up with a list of organizations that have committed fraud against the government or employed someone who did. Rep. Grayson will put his list in the Congressional Record as part of a legislative history that judges and lawyers can use to interpret the law. POGO’s Federal Contractor Misconduct Database is a great place to start.
At last count, it includes 87 instances of government contract fraud – federal and state – involving 43 contractors. You might want to focus on Lockheed Martin, which has 11 government contract fraud instances, or Northrop Grumman with 9 contract fraud instances including this $325 million False Claims Act settlement from earlier this year. Bear in mind that, since 1994, ACORN has reportedly received a total of $53 million in federal funds, or an average of roughly $3.5 million per year. In contrast, Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman respectively received over $35 billion and $18 billion in federal contracts last year. (Their totals since 2000 are $266 billion for Lockheed and $125 billion for Northrop.) Congress should clamp down on contractor fraud and waste, but it needs to keep a sense of proportion. If ACORN broke the law it, should be punished; however, Congress also needs to crack down just as rigorously on the contractors who take an even larger share of taxpayers’ money and have committed far more, or far more egregious, acts of misconduct. POGO hopes the mentality behind bills like the “Defund ACORN Act,” combined with the new contractor / grantee responsibility database and mandatory misconduct reporting rule, reflects a new zero-tolerance attitude toward contractor misconduct.
To a certain extent true. Yes there is fraud, waste and abuse abounding, always has, and always will. But ACORN's sins go far beyond just the recent cases of abuse, in fact they've been occurring over the lastten years.   Pajamas Media has a comprehensive guide to multiple cases of ACORN voter fraud, occurring in a staggering 16 states, all of which are investigating them at this time.

This video covers much of the voter fraud that ACORN was involved in over the last decade.

One could compare apples with oranges, but in the case of ACORN one would have to compare a mountain with a cabbage.    The Congressional move to strip ACORN of funding this last week wasn't a surprise.  But the greater question is why did it take this long.

Barack the Impatient!

So speaketh the KING!
"President Obama's central message to the Israeli and Palestinian leaders in New York today was simple, a U.S. official said: He's running out of patience. "The President of the United States is impatient," said the senior U.S. official. "That's what he told them."
Never stand between a King and his Waffles!


Repeat after Me, "Glenn Beck is a Performer - Not the Voice of the Conservative Movement"

First Limbaugh, now Beck.


Now, again, repeat after me, "Glenn Beck is a Performer, NOT the Voice of the Conservative Movement".

 Saying that I can't say that I'd agree that John McCain would have been a worst president than Obama, simply because I don't believe that when it's all said and done that it will be possible to go lower. But for pundits to get all huffy about it is a little more staging than reality. I like Levin but you can't help that part of his anger isn't with Beck per-se but with his popularity.

 Trust me there's a lot of "diva" in this business, even among men. So let's not forget that while we appreciate Beck, Limbaugh, Levin, Hannity, O'Reilly, they aren't leaders or voices of the conservative movement, they're simply performers - thats all.

 If you want to see the real leaders of the movement, look in the mirror.

Monday, September 21, 2009


Obama the New Joe Piscopo

"No one shifted an armchair, moved a flower arrangement or asked an unexpected question. President Obama gave five back-to-back television interviews broadcast on Sunday that were as tightly choreographed — and eerily similar — as the multiple Magritte bowler-hatted men milling in the remake of “The Thomas Crown Affair.”
The president’s talk show grand slam, conversations with CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS and Univision, all taped on Friday in the Roosevelt Room, was a remarkable — and remarkably overt — display of media management. Mr. Obama even doled out equal doses of presidential charm, chuckling ruefully about “rambunctious” protesters to Bob Schieffer of CBS and speaking self-deprecatingly to George Stephanopoulos of ABC, conceding that he had not presented his health care proposals in a way that allowed people to put “their whole arms around it.” “And that’s been a case where I have been humbled, and I just keep on trying harder,” he said. “Because I — I really think it’s the right thing to do for the country.”
No other president has been a guest on so many Sunday talk shows at once, which signaled how much Mr. Obama wanted to reclaim the health care debate and persuade skeptics that his plans would not increase taxes on the middle class. But for so well-spoken and confident a president, the lack of spontaneity on Sunday was striking. So was the homogeneity: Mr. Obama appeared on Univision, but he drew the line at Fox. Viewers have grown accustomed to the drama of live politics.
Sunday looked more like a string of TNT reruns, an Obama health care overhaul marathon. In each conversation, Mr. Obama proved what most people already know: he is a deft and appealing speaker who can stay on message. But there was nothing in those stagy interviews that shed light on whether his message would take hold. When asked by ABC if a health insurance mandate was the same as a tax increase, the president replied: “What I’ve said is that if you can’t afford health insurance, you certainly shouldn’t be punished for that.” He added: “For us to say that you’ve got to take a responsibility to get health insurance is absolutely not a tax increase.
What it’s saying is that we’re not going to have other people carrying your burdens for you anymore.” Mr. Obama declined to discuss his proposals on the one outlet guaranteed to find fault (or change the topic to the Acorn scandal). And that made his star turn look less like a media blitz than Medici vengeance — Fox did not broadcast Mr. Obama’s health care speech to Congress on Sept. 9, so Mr. Obama did not speak to “Fox News Sunday.” That omission was not as tactical as it was telling: a rare sign of frustration, and payback, by a White House that prides itself on diplomacy and an even keel. Mr. Obama sought on Sunday to bring a little order and civility to a debate that grows ever more heated and shrill.
But by boycotting, the White House seemed to be getting caught up in the kind of hostilities that increasingly divide Fox News Channel from its rivals. Mr. Obama is not usually one to avoid high-risk interviews or dodge hostile crowds. He was the first sitting president to appear on “The Tonight Show With Jay Leno,” in March, and despite a gaffe there the president plans to appear on David Letterman’s show on Monday. Mr. Obama has the wit to banter with comedians (and dance with Ellen DeGeneres). He has the charm to disarm detractors: his 2008 campaign interview with Chris Wallace of “Fox News Sunday” was quite cordial."
Whatever. Fox was cut out because it's the only network covering the ACORN and soon to be NEA scandal that might just be the Obama Watergate. "No one to dodge hostile crowds" fanny. Mr. Teleprompter got testy with George Stephanopoulos when he tried to get Obama to admit that his "mandated healthcare" wasn't in fact a tax increase. Anytime this guy is asked a question which is off script he squirms more than a worm on a hot griddle. Just for effect, who could forget this montage of Obama's skipping questions.


 But more, with Mr. Wonderful flooding TV screens every five minutes, I believe it might just backfire, as he becomes overexposed. Remember Joe Piscopo? Say Goodnight Barack.

Did the Obama Administration Use Public Funds to Push Agenda?

As promised, Andrew Breitbart reports on a NEA conference calls with Big Hollywood's Patrick Courrielche,  artists and reps from the Obama administration.

"On Thursday August 6th, I was invited by the National Endowment for the Arts to attend a conference call scheduled for Monday August 10th hosted by the NEA, the White House Office of Public Engagement, and United We Serve. The call would include “a group of artists, producers, promoters, organizers, influencers, marketers, taste-makers, leaders or just plain cool people to join together and work together to promote a more civically engaged America and celebrate how the arts can be used for a positive change!”
Read the rest.  The question now is whether the Obama administration used public funds to push their agenda on healthcare and other items?   If true this is a major scandal, and as you know the coverup is often worse than the crime.

Sunday, September 20, 2009


Obama's Plan to Disarm America Coming True

You'll remember I was one of the first to post the video of Barack Obama speaking about disarming America and making her weaker if he became President.

"Barack Obama has demanded the Pentagon conduct a radical review of US nuclear weapons doctrine to prepare the way for deep cuts in the country's arsenal, the Guardian can reveal.

Obama has rejected the Pentagon's first draft of the "nuclear posture review" as being too timid, and has called for a range of more far-reaching options consistent with his goal of eventually abolishing nuclear weapons altogether, according to European officials.
Those options include:
• Reconfiguring the US nuclear force to allow for an arsenal measured in hundreds rather than thousands of deployed strategic warheads.
• Redrafting nuclear doctrine to narrow the range of conditions under which the US would use nuclear weapons.
• Exploring ways of guaranteeing the future reliability of nuclear weapons without testing or producing a new generation of warheads.
The review is due to be completed by the end of this year, and European officials say the outcome is not yet clear. But one official said: "Obama is now driving this process. He is saying these are the president's weapons, and he wants to look again at the doctrine and their role."
The move comes as Obama prepares to take the rare step of chairing a watershed session of the UN security council on Thursday. It is aimed at winning consensus on a new grand bargain: exchanging more radical disarmament by nuclear powers in return for wider global efforts to prevent further proliferation.
That bargain is at the heart of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, which is up for review next year amid signs it is unravelling in the face of Iranian and North Korean nuclear ambitions."
"The president's weapons"?  Excuse me you lame-assed clown, those weapons belong to the people of the United States and before you decide to toss them on the scrap heap, and leave us open to attack by a Nuclear Iran or North Korea,  America might just have something to say to you in 2012.
Like get the hell out of here.

This one dangerous man.  Are you listening America?


Rick Sanchez - America's Doof

You know I'm not going to standby and let a doof like Rick Sanchez slander me beloved Fox News.  It's time to meet the real Rick Sanchez.

Back in 1992, in the wake of Hurricane Andrew as a 911 Dispatcher working in Homestead Florida, we witnessed first hand the hackery of Rick Sanchez.   Running out into the rain to act as though he were "roughing it", only to run back to his trailer when the lights were off.    The original media male Diva, he predates Perez Hilton.

I could go on, and I just might.  As I said before we know how this coward left a man to die after running over him while drunk.  His career should have been over then, but friends in high places bailed him out.  But that was 19 years ago, but there is much more to share.   This video parody speaks loads about just what kind of reporter Sanchez is.


Is ACORN Obama's Watergate?

Andrew Breitbart is promising a "blockbuster" this week in relation to the ACORN scandal. Here's part one:


And Part Two:


 Obama said today that he "welcomes an investigation", but so did Nixon. I mean there is always the feeling that you will be somehow protected against being "connected". We'll see what Andrew comes up with. I'm curious. Speculation brews over at The Green Room.

Obama Throws the Blind Brother Under the Bus


"WASHINGTON — President Obama has sent a request to Gov. David A. Paterson that he withdraw from the New York governor’s race, fearing that Mr. Paterson cannot recover from his dismal political standing, according to two senior administration officials and a New York Democratic operative with direct knowledge of the situation.

The decision to ask Mr. Paterson to step aside was proposed by political advisers to Mr. Obama, but approved by the president himself, one of the administration officials said.
“Is there concern about the situation in New York? Absolutely,” the second administration official said Saturday evening. “Has that concern been conveyed to the governor? Yes.”
The administration officials and the Democratic operative spoke on condition of anonymity because the discussions with the governor were intended to be confidential.
The president’s request was conveyed to the Mr. Paterson by Representative Gregory W. Meeks, a Queens Democrat, who has developed a strong relationship with the Obama administration, they said.
The move against a sitting Democratic governor represents an extraordinary intervention into a state political race by the president, and is a delicate one, given that Mr. Paterson is one of only two African-American governors in the nation.
But Mr. Obama’s political team and other party leaders have grown increasingly worried that the governor’s unpopularity could drag down Democratic members of Congress in New York, as well as the Democratic-controlled Legislature, in next fall’s election.
Mr. Paterson and his aides did not respond to repeated requests for comment Saturday. Mr. Paterson arrived on Long Island Saturday evening to attend a dinner, but walked hurriedly past a reporter who tried to ask him about the White House request."

Sounds like "racism" no? While he's at it he should also ask the other only black governor Mass. Gov Deval Patrick to take a hike as he's down in the polls as well.

Come to think of it Obama's poll numbers are sinking as well, so who throws him under the bus?

Saturday, September 19, 2009


An Independent Prosecutor for Looking into ACORN?

Ah but can Mr. Holder handle the truth?
"ACORN is in very deep, very public trouble, and the U.S. attorney general should appoint an independent prosecutor to investigate. What we know so far is due entirely to two amateur reporters, James E. O'Keefe III, 25, and Hannah Giles, 20, who managed to videotape a web of corrupt practices in ACORN offices. Dressed as a pimp and prostitute, O'Keefe and Giles walked into ACORN offices from New York to California and simply asked for business advice. ACORN officials were happy to provide it and were secretly recorded explaining exactly how to evade the law and scam the government. The tapes were riveting. Fox News rolled out a new one each night for a week, creating a firestorm of outrage and a burgeoning political scandal. ACORN employees, without raising an eyebrow, much less calling the police, explained how the young sex workers could label themselves "performance artists," underreport their income, evade taxes, fraudulently buy a house to ply their trade, and, worst of all, import underage girls from Central America to use as child prostitutes. One ACORN employee helpfully explained that the teenagers would even be tax-deductible since they would be "dependents," living in the pimp's house. Some states, led by California, are saying they will investigate. But this is a national scandal and there ought to be a full-scale national inquiry. To ensure impartiality -- and the appearance of impartiality -- political appointees at the U.S. Department of Justice should recuse themselves. This case demands an independent federal prosecutor. Independent prosecutors should not be appointed lightly. But in this case, there are good reasons why Atty. Gen. Eric Holder and other political appointees in the Justice Department should step aside. First, although no allegations have yet touched the Obama campaign, ACORN did have significant ties to the campaign and other progressive causes. Published reports show that ACORN and its subsidiaries received some $800,000 from the Obama campaign to get out the vote. Second, ACORN is intimately tied to the Service Employees International Union, one of President Barack Obama's most powerful and vocal supporters. ACORN's close ties to the progressive movement and Democratic Party mean that there will be little public confidence if Holder decides not to pursue an ambitious investigation and ultimately prosecute."
The issue here is of course just how much did the President know about the trouble that ACORN was experiencing.

 Last year Stanley Kurtz did a bang up job reporting the very close relationship that Obama had and has with ACORN. Just another in a litany of example of Barack Obama's associations with criminals, radicals and thieves.

 But ACORN goes to the heart and if an investigation were launched it could very well go to the seat, or rather unseating of Obama's presidency. For that reason you can bet Holder doesn't do squat. He only acts independently when he's roasting CIA agents.

Silky Pony about to get Slammed? Will John Edwards Be Convicted of Campaign Fraud?

I don't know what's more fascinating, the John Edwards story itself or the incredible lack of media coverage or the stupidity of the reporting thereof.
"CHAPEL HILL, N.C. — The story of the spectacular rise and fall of John Edwards, with its sordid can’t-look-away dimensions, is moving slowly but deliberately to its conclusion here in North Carolina. Mr. Edwards, the one-term senator who came close to being elected vice president in 2004 and ran a credible campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008, remains largely secluded at his 100-acre estate here. But a federal grand jury in nearby Raleigh is investigating whether any crimes were committed in connection with campaign laws in an effort to conceal his extramarital affair with a woman named Rielle Hunter. At the same time, Mr. Edwards is moving toward an abrupt reversal in his public posture; associates said in interviews that he is considering declaring that he is the father of Ms. Hunter’s 19-month-old daughter, something that he once flatly asserted in a television interview was not possible. Friends and other associates of Mr. Edwards and his wife of 32 years, Elizabeth, say she has resisted the idea of her husband’s claiming paternity. Mrs. Edwards, who is battling cancer, “has yet to be brought around,” said one family friend, who like others spoke about the situation on the condition of anonymity, pointing to the complicated and delicate nature of the issue. The situation may become more fraught, as people who know Ms. Hunter said she was planning to move with her daughter, Frances, from New Jersey to North Carolina in coming months. For her grand jury appearance on Aug. 6, Ms. Hunter took her daughter to the federal courthouse in downtown Raleigh. As she walked in, she seemed to turn the girl’s face toward the local television cameras. Ms. Hunter testified to the grand jury in detail about her relationship with Mr. Edwards, lawyers involved in the case said, as well as the benefits she was provided by his supporters after she became pregnant. Michael Crichtley, her lawyer, declined to comment. According to people familiar with the grand jury investigation, prosecutors are considering a complicated and novel legal issue: whether payments to a candidate’s mistress to ensure her silence (and thus maintain the candidate’s viability) should be considered campaign donations and thus whether they should be reported. When Mr. Edwards was running for president, and even later when he still held out hope of a senior cabinet position in the Obama administration, two of his wealthy patrons, through a once-trusted Edwards aide, quietly provided Ms. Hunter with large financial benefits, including a new BMW and lodging, that were used to keep her out of public view."
You're kidding right? "Complicated and Novel" my butt. How can anyone even consider the use of campaign funds to keep a mistress silent even remotely legal? It's illegal to misuse campaign funds for personal use - period. This isn't rocket science even for lawyers in NC.

NY Times - Obama Likable Flunky on Foreign Policy

"WASHINGTON — As President Obama welcomes world leaders to the United States this week, he has gone a long way toward meeting his goal of restoring the country’s international standing. Foreign counterparts flock to meet with him, and polls show that people in many countries feel much better about the United States. But eight months after his inauguration, all that good will so far has translated into limited tangible policy benefits for Mr. Obama. As much as they may prefer to deal with Mr. Obama instead of his predecessor, George W. Bush, foreign leaders have not gone out of their way to give him what he has sought. European allies still refuse to send significantly more troops to Afghanistan. The Saudis basically ignored Mr. Obama’s request for concessions to Israel, while Israel rebuffed his demand to stop settlement expansion. North Korea defied him by testing a nuclear weapon. Japan elected a party less friendly to the United States. Cuba has done little to liberalize in response to modest relaxation of sanctions. India and China are resisting a climate change deal. And Russia rejected new sanctions against Iran’s nuclear program even as Mr. Obama heads into talks with Tehran."
But of course they like him. "They" meaning the world's despots such as North Korea, Iran, Russia, Libya. They like him because they can play him like a fiddle much like Putin did in getting him to drop our missile shield in eastern Europe. During the summit in 1961 Nikita Khrushchev liked Kennedy's smile and Jackie's er, figure. But he chewed Kennedy up and spat him out during their meeting. This led to us to the brink of nuclear war. Kennedy didn't have the 'metal' and neither does Obama. Anyone can be likable, but it takes strength, tenacity, and guts to be a leader and so far we've seen nothing of this from Obama.

Don't Look Now but Media Matters Just Flew over the Cuckoos Nest

They don't call it the "looney left" for nothing.
"That being John F. Kennedy, who was gunned down in Dallas, of course. I've been thinking a lot of Kennedy and Dallas as I've watched the increasingly violent rhetorical attacks on Obama be unfurled. As Americans yank their kids of class in order to save them from being exposed to the President of the United States who only wanted to urge them to excel in the classroom. And as unvarnished hate and name-calling passed for health care 'debate' this summer. The radical right, aided by a GOP Noise Machine that positively dwarfs what existed in 1963, has turned demonizing Obama--making him into a vile object of disgust--into a crusade. It's a demented national jihad, the likes of which this country has not seen in modern times. But I've been thinking about Dallas in 1963 because I've been recalling the history and how that city stood as an outpost for the radical right, which never tried to hide its contempt for the New England Democrat. Now, in this this month's Vanity Fair, Sam Kashner offers up in rich detail the hatred that ran wild in Dallas in 1963. To me, the similarity between Dallas in 1963 and today's unhinged Obama hate is downright chilling."
Right. Talk about "Paranoia". Of course this is just the latest in scare tactics from the left to help squelch growing public dissatisfaction with Barack Obama. The design is obvious, to tie in critical talk of Obama and his socialist agenda into a "hate crime", thus "illegal", a typical socialist move. Demonize your opponents. Of course point of history, Lee Harvey Oswald wasn't a "right winger" by any stretch of the imagination, which is a fact MM leaves out of the post. Which kinda destroys the whole crazy idea. But that's never stopped MM before.

Kettle Black: DUI Killer Rick Sanchez calls Fox Liar

Coming from a guy who killed a man while driving drunk and left the scene of the accident.
It happened on Dec. 10, 1990. Mr. Sanchez, seriously drunk behind the wheel, with his dad as passenger, was leaving a Miami Dolphins game. He had barely left the stadium parking area before he hit a man who was running between cars, and who (unfortunately) was also drunk. Undoubtedly helped by invisible friends on the police force, Sanchez was not charged with causing the accident, but was later charged with (and pleaded no contest to) DUI. But here's the cowardly part: Sanchez initially left the scene of the accident for 2 full hours. One local report said he first went home to get his license and fell asleep. (Yeah, right.) Anyway, by the time he meandered back to the scene and his dilly-dallying cop friends tested him for alcohol, it was at least four hours after the accident. Even with all his friends helping him, Sanchez's blood still registered .15 -- way above the then-legal-limit of .10. Closing chapter for victim: The Miami Herald, Nov. 2, 1995 "Jeffrey Smuzinick, who was left paralyzed after being struck by the car of Channel 7 anchor Rick Sanchez, died Monday in a Pennsylvania nursing home. He was 36. Smuzinick was injured Dec. 10, 1990, after he ran out into traffic following a Dolphins football game. He was struck by A 1991 Volvo driven by Sanchez. Smuzinick suffered severe head injuries and was in a coma for many months. He underwent rehabilitation in Florida ..."
Rick was known to be a "save his own ass" kind of guy when he was down in here in the early 90s on WSVN Channel 7. So hearing him call someone else a "liar" is kind of like hearing a tomato talk.

Sour Grapes: Media get's Called Out on Lack of 9/12 Cover and Jake Tapper Cries Foul


"Jake Tapper, on Twitter this morning, took issue with a Fox News ad in today’s Washington Post, that he says is “asserting that every other channel ‘missed’ the story of the 912 march. Demonstrably untrue.”

He pointed out that Yunji de Nies, his ABC colleague at the White House, covered last weekend’s protest.
But even that wasn't enough for some, and after a back and forth on Twitter,  Tapper wrote that it was his “last tweet defending a fact.”

“To the non-reality based community, have a great day and nice weekend,” he wrote."

The only "non-reality based" person is is Jake Tapper.    Fact is that  had this been a war protest, or some other lefty gathering you would have given it wall to wall coverage.  Covering isn't sending an assistant - an intern - to cover an event for five minutes, it's front page and that's what this event deserved.  Again, when Bush was president and there were protest ABC threw out the stops.

Fact is Jake, that when checking the channels last Saturday we found only Fox - Glenn Beck - to be providing full coverage, but MSNBC and CNN had nothing on but Obama's healthcare speech.

That's the facts Jake, have a nice weekend.

UPDATE:  Media Bristol, referenced in the link above, now comes to the defense of the network in saying they were there.   Again, reporting that a volcano erupted is one thing, being there on the scene with a blow by blow is something else.

The media might have talked about 9/12, but their heart wasn't in it.    Point of fact it wasn't the ACORN story or the Van Jones story or any other negative story about Barack Obama the entire year.

You know the old adage, when you hit a nerve the culprit yelps.  

Friday, September 18, 2009


Amnesty in Your Face! Obama Administration Plans to Make Illegals - Legal Through Amnesty

Washington Times.

"President Obama said this week that his health care plan won't cover illegal immigrants, but argued that's all the more reason to legalize them and ensure they eventually do get coverage.
He also staked out a position that anyone in the country legally should be covered - a major break with the 1996 welfare reform bill, which limited most federal public assistance programs only to citizens and longtime immigrants.

"Even though I do not believe we can extend coverage to those who are here illegally, I also don't simply believe we can simply ignore the fact that our immigration system is broken," Mr. Obama said Wednesday evening in a speech to the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute. "That's why I strongly support making sure folks who are here legally have access to affordable, quality health insurance under this plan, just like everybody else.
Mr. Obama added, "If anything, this debate underscores the necessity of passing comprehensive immigration reform and resolving the issue of 12 million undocumented people living and working in this country once and for all."
Republicans said that amounts to an amnesty, calling it a backdoor effort to make sure current illegal immigrants get health care."
And it is.  Giving healthcare to those who came here illegally is madness and again shows that not only is Obama out of control, he's just clinch a Republican Sweep in 2010 and 2010.

American by a wide margin oppose giving healthcare to illegals and indeed want illegal immigrants to be shown the border back to where they came from.   Obama is proposing a sweeping amnesty, and on top of that adding millions to his plan for tax payer supported government healthcare for illegals.

Thursday, September 17, 2009


Ahmadinejad - "Hey Obama, Thanks, Now we Make Bomb"

Well that didn't take long.  First Obama screws our Eastern European allies out of a missile defense, now?

"VIENNA (AP) - Experts at the world's top atomic watchdog are in agreement that Tehran has the ability to make a nuclear bomb and is on the way to developing a missile system able to carry an atomic warhead, according to a secret report seen by The Associated Press."

George Bush was right.  "This is a dangerous world,' .... this cat [Obama] isn't remotely qualified to handle it. This guy has no clue, I promise you'."


It's Treason: Obama Removes Missile Defense Shield

Obama bows to Putin:

"WASHINGTON -- The White House is scrapping a Bush-era plan for an Eastern European missile-defense shield, saying a redesigned defensive system would be cheaper, quicker and more effective against the threat from Iranian missiles.
"After an extensive process, I have approved the unanimous recommendations of my secretary of defense and my joint chiefs of staff to strengthen America's defenses against ballistic-missile attack," President Barack Obama said in an announcement Thursday morning.
The previous administration's plans will be changed, moving away from the installation of a missile-defense shield in the Czech Republic and Poland in the near future. A second phase to begin in 2015 could result in missiles being placed on land in Eastern Europe.

"Our new missile defense architecture in Europe will provide stronger, smarter and swifter defenses of American forces and America's allies," Mr. Obama said. "It is more comprehensive than the previous program, it deploys capabilities that are proven and cost effective, and it sustains and builds upon our commitment to protect the U.S. homeland."

Defense Secretary Robert Gates said the decision to abandon the Bush administration's plans came about because of a change in the U.S. perception of the threat posed by Iran."
Obama is simply doing what he promised to do.  Make us a weaker nation by disarming our defenses.  Nile Gardiner comments:
This is bad news for all who care about the US commitment to the transatlantic alliance and the defence of Europe as well as the United States. It represents the appalling appeasement of Russian aggression and a willingness to sacrifice American allies on the altar of political expediency. A deal with the Russians to cancel missile defence installations sends a clear message that even Washington can be intimidated by the Russian bear.

What signal does this send to Ukraine, Georgia and a host of other former Soviet satellites who look to America and NATO for protection from their powerful neighbour? The impending cancellation of Third Site is a shameful abandonment of America's friends in eastern and central Europe, and a slap in the face for those who actually believed a key agreement with Washington was worth the paper it was written on.
Such committment means little to Obama or other democrats. Never has.

Lots of reacts at Memeorandum, and I'm on the road and update a bit later.  But if ever a reason existed to accuse a sitting President of treason and remove him this is it. 

Wednesday, September 16, 2009


Screw You Carter

Somehow being called a "racist" by an anti-semetic old fart doesn't really bother me. Carter has long since lost relativity anything remotely American and indeed it would be better if he fell off a cliff, got run over by a rabbit or something.

 What's even more telling is that the mainstream media let's him get away with it. But this stuff about being racist if you think Obama's wrong is simple nonsense and indeed it's racist on it's own merits. If Condi Rice were President Carter would be reverting to his ancient Southern ancestry and telling us she'd be better on the farm harvesting peanuts. 

He was a disgrace 35 years ago, he continues to be so.

 But he is simply repeating the new "mantra" from the left. Of course the charge of "racism" bilge-water and is especially insulting to the American people, but more than that it's another example of just how bad liberals have taken their identity politics.

 Liberals will get in a huff if you call them anti-semetic when they oppose Israel, saying that they can be for Israel but against their policies. That would be true if it that simple. But most of the left is by way of doctrine decidedly anti-semetic in more than just the disagreement about their way of handling their security.

 Yet to say that one is racist because one opposes bad ideas isn't an equal, especially when you refer it to a large segment of the American population.

 Remember it wasn't conservatives who made Obama's race an issue, it was the liberal media. From Time asking if he was "Black Enough", to the LA Times calling him the "Magic Negro", you never heard one peep from any conservative news source referencing Obama's race, merely his qualifications. In fact during the presidential campaign it became increasingly clear from liberals that the only good reason to vote for Obama was because he was black.

 For instance last year over at Salon, lefty Gary Kamiya profoundly stated that it was the big reason he was going to vote for Obama. "I admit it: I'm voting for Barack Obama because he's black. Yes, I'm voting for him because he's qualified, intelligent, charismatic and competent -- and because unlike Hillary Clinton, he opposed the Iraq war from the beginning. But if he weren't black, and Hillary had opposed the war, I'd probably vote for her because of her greater experience. In any case, it's a moot point, because if Obama weren't black, he would not be the Democratic front-runner. I believe that most of Obama's supporters are voting for him for the same reason. Like me, they're drawn to his idealism, his youthful energy, his progressive politics. But it's his blackness that seals the deal. And that's OK. In fact, it's wonderful."

Another lefty Greg Palast echoed the same theme.
"So, I'm going to do something that Dr. Bruce would think little of. I'm going to vote for the Black man. Because he's Black. The truth is, I'm wary of Barack Obama. His cozy relations with the sub-prime loan sharks who funded his early campaign; his vote, at the behest of his big donor ADM corporation, for the horrific Bush energy bill. But there's one thing that overshadows policy positions, one thing he cannot change once in office: the color of his skin. The same as Mr. Bruce's. I'm going to say something that I know the Obama campaign will just hate; but that many others are feeling but won't say out loud. We must vote for Barack Obama because he's Black. For four centuries, our nation has poisoned itself with the corrosive venom of racism. From the slave trade, to our still-segregated schools, to the Bush family stealing the White House by cynically, and sinfully, calling Florida Black voters felons; to the exile of a brilliant science teacher four decades ago. The time has come to cleanse the wound that will not heal."
Heck even Joe Biden said it was really the only logical solution.
"Democratic vice presidential candidate Joe Biden, campaigning in North Carolina where black votes could help swing the state to the Democrats, said today that electing a black person to the White House would be transformative. Biden said the policies of running mate Barack Obama make his presidency even more urgent and declared this to be the most important election that any living person has seen in their lifetime. But he particularly singled out the meaning of electing someone who is black. “That will be a transformative event in American politics and internationally,” Biden said. “That all by itself will be significant.”
Billy Joel sang, "We Didn't Start the Fire", and it's true in this case of we who oppose Barack Obama's policies. Lefties made Obama's race a factor of qualification telling us to vote for the guy simply because he was black. But now when he's failing, not because he's black, but because he's in over his head, they want it both ways - forgive him and shut up because he's black. There is a racism him, but it's not coming from our side.

Tuesday, September 15, 2009


Curious Language on New House Rules

You have to wonder. During the Democratically controlled hissy fit over Joe Wilson today, Chair Woman Louise Slaughter enacted these new Committee Rules.

Under section 370 of the House Rules and Manual it has been held that a Member could:

  • refer to the government as “something hated, something oppressive.”
  • refer to the President as “using legislative or judicial pork.”
  • refer to a Presidential message as a “disgrace to the country.”
  • refer to unnamed officials as “our half-baked nitwits handling foreign affairs.”
Likewise, it has been held that a member could not:

  • call the President a “liar.”
  • call the President a “hypocrite.”
  • describe the President’s veto of a bill as “cowardly.”
  • charge that the President has been “intellectually dishonest.”
  • refer to the President as “giving aid and comfort to the enemy.”
  • refer to alleged “sexual misconduct on the President’s part.”

Ok, that last one is interesting. So what is Ms. Slaughter expecting to come out in the future on Barack Obama's "alleged" sexual misconduct?

ACORN'S Troubles grow - How Long Before the Feds Move in?

As you know by now ACORN has lost it's funding through the Senate, now it's comes to light that they have not been operating legally in Maryland.

"Last week, we saw some pretty disturbing activities revealed in the undercover footage from ACORN Housing’s Baltimore office. By any measure of conduct, the actions of ACORN’s employees should never have happened. It turns out the actions shouldn’t have happened for another, very simple, reason: ACORN can’t legally operate in the state of Maryland. According to the following documents, ACORN, Inc.–the parent organization of all things ACORN–forfeited its corporate charter in Maryland in 2006. ACORN Housing forfeited its corporate charter in 2008. Any ACORN office in the state of Maryland is potentially operating illegally. The Maryland Attorney General has made noise about prosecuting the intrepid journalists who undercovered the misdeeds of ACORN employees. Perhaps he should focus instead on how ACORN was able to operate without a license in his state." 
So far - except for Fox News - there has been zero reporting from the mainstream media. But the story is growing by leaps and bounds. Here is a video of an ACORN organizer, former hooker describing how she killed her husband. She also names a litany of democratic politicians including Barbara Boxer.


Bush Off the Cuff and Telling the Truth

The one consistent about the Bush administration is that no one who's worked there can keep their mouth shut afterwards.   Nevertheless the latest blabber-puss is Matt Latimer, who obviously is trying to make a buck or two, has published a book about off-the-cuff statements by President Bush while he was his speech writer.

So what do we learn?

He's not a real conservative.   But then we never thought he was.  The nice thing is that we now have a resurgence of conservatism not seen since the days of Reagan.

He thinks Hillary has a fat ass, but then that opinion is shared by most the free world.   Come on does anyone seriously think it's a skinny ass?

He thought that Sarah Palin was out of her league being picked for VP.   Again not a isolated opinion.  He thought the same of Obama, we're unfortunately finding how true that is now.

On Joe Biden: "If bull was currency, Joe Biden would be a billionaire."    Who could possibly disagree with that?

Monday, September 14, 2009


One Photo Doesn't Tell the Story on 9/12

The Politifact Check notes that this photo, used to show the crowds on Saturday was in fact taken in 1997 at a Promise Keeper's Rally.

Fine, but we didn't need it anyway.   The other photos produced from that day more than equal that in size.

And this:

 Perhaps if "Polifact" were indeed "unbiased" it would have provided a bit of "context".

Blogburst - Tomorrow Flood the Congressional Lines with Support for Joe Wilson

Democrats have decided to go after Joe.

"The House Dem leadership has decided that it must condemn Joe Wilson for his “you lie,” outburst, and is likely to decry his “conduct” and his “breach of decorum” as early as tomorrow, rather than censure him for “speech” and turn the standoff into a war over freedom of expression, a Dem leadership aide confirms.
“The issue at hand is one of conduct, not speech,” the aide emailed me when asked to describe internal thinking. “Congressman Wilson’s outburst during the joint session was a breach of decorum and brought discredit to the House.”
Wilson apologized to White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, but he’s ruled out an apology to the full House. The aide said failure to do that will result in action because the leadership has determined that the House is compelled to act.
“It is common for members to address such breaches themselves rather than force action by the full House,” the aide said. “Failure to respond would mean consent for that kind of conduct. In the absence of an apology, the House must act to admonish his behavior. These are the standards members are held to when they take the oath of office.”
The aide confirmed that the vote would take place tomorrow at the earliest."
Which is total unadulterated crap.  The Dems didn't give to flips when they booed and cat-called Bush during his addresses, nor when Harry Reid called him a "loser" or when Pelosi called him "a total failure".

So tomorrow let's have a good show of support for Joe Wilson.  Flood the Congressional Switchboard at (202) 224-3121.    While you're at it, support Joe with a donation to his campaign.

Powered by Blogger.


Total Pageviews

Search This Blog

Blog Archive



Pages - Menu

Macsmind - Official Blog of The MacRanger Show on Blog Talk Radio


Go here.