Skip to main content

Countering Josh Marshall

As former law enforcement, with knowledge of these things. I have read the indictment of Rep. Tom Delay and ask,

"Are you f-king kidding me? I mean, is this it?"

The Fifty Dollar Challenge. Read the idictment and tell me exactly what Delay is charged with. Not generalities.

If I would have prepared probable cause affidavits like this I would have ended up on parking detail.

Oh, who am I kidding - it's not the outcome or the merit of a case we are talking about here, to Democrats it's simply the accusation - EXCEPT when it involves one of their own.

Of course Earle knows this isn't going anywhere, it's not designed to do anything but to damage Delay politically. Well done you hack.

Just remember, "What goes around, comes around." my man.

Democrats and the Moonies are already screaming about a "Culture of Corruption".

Ya, Oki-Doki....

Witness Talking Points Memo Josh Marshall who asks:

"House Majority Leader Indicted for Criminal Conspiracy.

Senate Majority Leader the target of an increasingly serious probe of potential insider trading.

Rumors of October Rove indictment in the Plame case.

Is this a problem yet?"


Aye....

Well Josh it depends on what you mean by "problem".

For instance, is this a problem for Senator Chuck Schumer?

The Man in the Mirror

Or is this a problem for Senator Nancy Pelosi?

Pelosi Ethic's Violations

Btw, we're still waiting for Nancy to answer this query.

Or Sen. Jon Corzine's

"stock options".

Or Senator Reid

Money Connected

If so, then perhaps it's a problem. If not, then it's simply a matter of who the MSM is focusing on.

And as always Josh, to quote El Savior - the man who knows all about indictments as he led the most corrupt government in American History. Who, as a matter of fact owns all the records:

The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance

- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation.
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify.
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly.
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions.
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad.

So when you say "problem", it all depends on what you mean by the word "problem". For instance, it's like the word "sex".......


"Hypocrites kick with their hind feet while licking with their tongues"

-Russian Proverb











Cpt Ed weighs in with some ethics and possible disbarring facts about DA Ronnie Earle. I hope that when it's said and done Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott looks into his conduct. Simply put, enough is enough.

As usualMichelle Malkin(fastest typist I know) is keeping links going. Polipundit with commentary and comments. Tom Mcguire; Blogs for Bush, with a h/t to bfb on NRO great post on the Media Blog. AJ Strata locks and loads. And the The Politburo Diktat has a fact sheet on Ronnie Earle.

UPDATE: To answer the "He prosecuted more Democrats than Republicans", the fact is that Mr. Earle has used the office he has to go after POLITICAL enemies, no matter which party they are from.

All roads lead to Travis County btw, you know, home of Burkett. Yeah, no agenda here.

UPDATE II: Oh Yeah!.

UPDATE III: If you want to see that the left knows it's bogus watch "hunter" at Daily Kos decend into the pit of insanity. Ain't it fun?

UPDATE: IV: Eleanor Cliff is partying like it's 1994 for the Republicans. Truth is that the American people aren't so easily decieived by a partisan (movie star on a mission from God) prosecutor. At last count (see above) Democratic scandals far outdistance Republican's 2-1.

And they haven't seen anything yet. Wait and see.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Is the lid about to be blown off Able Danger?

Those who have been wishing for a full blown Able Danger investigation are about to get their wish. The "gate" has been unlocked.

9/11 Iraqi Connection

With Democrats calling for yet more investigations into pre-war intelligence, and Republicans like myself pushing back to help their 'sudden amnesia”, the growing stories of Able Danger and even China Gate, are beginning to make news.

The three main theories about why Able Danger hasn't gotten out of the "blog stage", are 1) To hide Clinton era responsibility for stopping the 9/11 attacks, and/or 2) To hide the truth behind China-Gate, or 3) The facts show that there in fact was a direct link between Iraq and 9/11.

Taking either one you can see why the Clinton worshipping MSM for the most part hasn't touched the story. Of the later point, Democrats, the MSM and even some of our investigations state that there was no 'direct' link between Iraq and 9/11. Say otherwise and the MSM will slice and di…

Able Danger - Pulling Back the Covers of the real Clinton Legacy

First, let's dispense with the bull crap. The meeting between Mohammed Atta and Iraqi Intelligence officer Al-Ani, on April 8th, 2001 happened.

Yet, just don't mention it to the MSM, becaue since May of 2002, the MSM declared an all out assault on the story. A meeting incidently, that the Czech government has to this date stood by.

Let's review a little history:

October 13, 2001: Story of the meeting is leaked from somewhere in the Czech foreign service.

yet.....

October 20, 2001: Ny Times, John Tagliabue writes a story citing other Czech officials said the meeting never took place.

so.....

October 26, 2001: Czech Minister of the Interior, Stanislav Gross has a press conference not only confirming the orginal report but giving further details of Atta's other trip to Prague in June 2000.

then.....

October 27, 2001: The NY Times "recants" the October 20th denial.

The story continues it's oddessy of 'back and forth' until May 1st, 2002, when Walter P…