Skip to main content

Wanna Bet?

MSNBC - Eleanor Clift - Hurricane Politics

"It feels like we’re back in a political campaign with the White House shifting blame to local and state Democratic officials for the shamefully slow response to hurricane Katrina’s devastation. You can fault all levels of government, but the federal government is the last line of defense, and it was clear by the day after the storm struck that this was a regional disaster with national implications for the country’s economic and social well-being.

President Bush has worked so hard to not repeat the mistakes of his father, especially the senior Bush’s lackadaisical response to Florida's Hurricane Andrew, which helped cost him re-election. Former president Bush was never able to reconnect with the American people despite such heroically comic efforts as reading aloud a talking point his handlers had given him: “Message—I care.”


Oh.....well, first you liberals are usually calling the Government the First Line of Defense!

You know, "The Government is your Daddy, your Mommy, your BEST friend!....

Now it's the last line of defense...

Guess so, especially when the FIRST LINE of Democrats at the State and Local level let the people literally wash away.......

If there’s an upside to Katrina, it’s that the Republican agenda of tax cuts, Social Security privatization and slashing government programs is over. It may be too much to predict an upsurge of progressive government, but the environment and issues of poverty, race and class are back on the nation’s radar screen. The proper role for government will be debated as we move toward the next presidential election. “Nobody is for smaller government when you’re in the middle of a hurricane or a flood,” says former Louisiana senator John Breaux. An e-mail I received from a NEWSWEEK reader says if somebody had tried to withdraw a feeding tube from a brain-damaged woman at the Superdome, Bush would have sent in the Marines, a poke at the president’s hasty return to Washington during the Terri Schiavo episode compared with his halting response to Katrina."

Wanna bet? Those "race and poverty" cards may be on the DNC's cards, but according to the poll's taken so far - the general public isn't taking the bait.

This isn't 1968.

But worry not, Bush's agenda is going to be fine. In fact everytime you liberals have pronounced his agenda dead - it wasn't. When you predicted a close election, it wasn't. When you thought that after two weeks of playing the "Blame Bush" the public would by the propaganda, they didn't.

Wrong as usual, you'll be found wrong again.

By the way, The Mayor of New Orleans who failed to bus thousands of poor blacks out harms way was well, "black" wasn't he?.....

I digress. But Eleanor forgets that three years in this Country and the Political landscape is hugh.

In fact, mark this prediction down:

Democrats are going to lose BIG in 2006 and 2008 precisely because of their actions and even more because of their "reaction" to Katrina. Ourside their rabid ultra-Michael Moore base, it's not going over well at all with the main stream of the party.

"Even some Republicans agree with Hillary Clinton that FEMA should be restored to stand-alone status as a government agency rather than being wedged into the giant bureaucracy of the Department of Homeland Security. The merger has never been a happy one, with agency officials still squabbling over wearing jackets emblazoned with FEMA or DHS. President Clinton rebuilt FEMA during his presidency, and Jamie Lee Witt, the Arkansan who led the agency, won praise from Republicans as well as Democrats for his cool and caring competence. Louisiana Gov. Kathleen Blanco has brought in Witt to help her with the recovery and reconstruction, a move that underscores the partisan animosity that has taken hold in the wake of the bungled relief efforts."

Ok, forget the fact that Hillary voted to have FEMA rolled into DHS, her touting of FEMA's record during hubby Bill's tenure has people in South Carolina seeing RED - vis, HUGO. Here's a bit of that story:

"FEMA Again Plays the Villain to Some Across Lowcountry; Hard feelings toward agency stirred up as residents watch familiar response. -- Hurricane Katrina is leaving one more big black blotch on the reputation of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, vilified in the Lowcountry since Hurricane Hugo and frustrating residents as recently as Hurricane Gaston last year. The nation has watched in horror as New Orleans has descended into lawlessness and despair in the wake of Katrina. By most accounts, armed looters now roam the streets, while tens of thousands of thirsty and tired refugees wait in filthy conditions for transportation out of the flooded city... Katrina is worse than what Charleston saw after Hugo, where FEMA's response also trailed local efforts. Critics say the FEMA response for the new storm is just as slow as it was for Gaston last year. Local residents and officials watch it with reactions that range from disappointment to disgust.

"U.S. Sen. Fritz Hollings, now retired, used his political muscle to move military support instead behind [the mayor's] efforts. 'To me, it's a reminder that our country can do much better,' said Charleston Mayor Joe Riley, who led Charleston's response to Hugo in 1989. After Hugo devastated the counties around Charleston, local officials pleaded for emergency help and were told by agency officials strapped for money and personnel to apply through the governor."


Yeah, thanks Bill. By the way? Did you read about what Bill and Hillary were doing as the Hurricane chugged toward the 'Big Easy'?

Anyway.... Blanco's bringing in of Whitt may be welcome, but about 10,000 evacuees would have been happy if she would have let the Red Cross into the Dome. Would have been most helpful.

Or more blunt, as I read today, ""If Sen. Mary Landrieu were as good at busing black people to safety as she was at busing them to the polls to vote, none of them would have died."

Filed under

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Is the lid about to be blown off Able Danger?

Those who have been wishing for a full blown Able Danger investigation are about to get their wish. The "gate" has been unlocked.

9/11 Iraqi Connection

With Democrats calling for yet more investigations into pre-war intelligence, and Republicans like myself pushing back to help their 'sudden amnesia”, the growing stories of Able Danger and even China Gate, are beginning to make news.

The three main theories about why Able Danger hasn't gotten out of the "blog stage", are 1) To hide Clinton era responsibility for stopping the 9/11 attacks, and/or 2) To hide the truth behind China-Gate, or 3) The facts show that there in fact was a direct link between Iraq and 9/11.

Taking either one you can see why the Clinton worshipping MSM for the most part hasn't touched the story. Of the later point, Democrats, the MSM and even some of our investigations state that there was no 'direct' link between Iraq and 9/11. Say otherwise and the MSM will slice and di…

Able Danger - Pulling Back the Covers of the real Clinton Legacy

First, let's dispense with the bull crap. The meeting between Mohammed Atta and Iraqi Intelligence officer Al-Ani, on April 8th, 2001 happened.

Yet, just don't mention it to the MSM, becaue since May of 2002, the MSM declared an all out assault on the story. A meeting incidently, that the Czech government has to this date stood by.

Let's review a little history:

October 13, 2001: Story of the meeting is leaked from somewhere in the Czech foreign service.

yet.....

October 20, 2001: Ny Times, John Tagliabue writes a story citing other Czech officials said the meeting never took place.

so.....

October 26, 2001: Czech Minister of the Interior, Stanislav Gross has a press conference not only confirming the orginal report but giving further details of Atta's other trip to Prague in June 2000.

then.....

October 27, 2001: The NY Times "recants" the October 20th denial.

The story continues it's oddessy of 'back and forth' until May 1st, 2002, when Walter P…