Skip to main content

The "Payback' Continues

Newsweek: Beyond Good and Evil

You know, I finally fiqured out why there is this seeming endless public flogging of President Bush going on in the MSM

This in spite of the fact that the severity of the aftermath of Katrina had very little to do with the Federal response (that was actually there in the Dome), and more to do with an incompetent Mayor and Governor.

But moreover, what we are actually seeing. article by article, commentary by commentary, is the "spanking" of the President by a MSM that despite everything they could throw at Bush to make him lose in 2004 - the guy won anyway. So the "punishment" continues -and it's getting more personal.

Witness this from the writer that suggested terrorism is a disease, George Dickey:

"If President Bush looks lost in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina (and the rest of us feel that way), it’s because he has no one to blame for this catastrophe. The apocalypse was brought on not by the forces of evil, but of nature, aided and abetted by the incompetence of Bush’s own administration. As a bitter reader from Fairview, N.J. wrote to us this week: “If we are to believe that President Bush and the Christian Right have been talking directly to God these past six years, then it follows that this is God's answer to their agenda.”

That’s a cheap shot, to be sure, but it’s also a natural question given the righteous pose of a presidency that’s suspicious of science and utterly intolerant of dissent. The fact is, we may draw on our faith for moral and spiritual strength, but there should never be a place in American policymaking for those who claim they’ve got a direct line to God. Such lunatic certainties are the preserve of the enemy—the Osama bin Ladens, the Eric Rudolphs, the Baruch Goldsteins—who want to replace our freethinking societies with ones ordered by their own narrow-minded righteousness."


Ok, cheap shot?

"Rightous pose"? "Suspicion of Science"? Do I detect a bit of animosity about the Intelligence Design comment the President made a month or so ago?

And when did the President claim he had a "Direct line to God"? The "Christa-phobia" of the left is amazing isn't it?

I could let this slide, but then Mr. Dickey compares the President of the United States and in general others of faith to people like Osama Bin Laden and Eric Rudolf.

When devoid of facts, which this tripe is, they resort to slander.

Does anyone really wonder why the left just can't win an election?

I would have bailed out at this point, except for this little tidbit where Mr. Dickey quotes a reader:

"As a bitter reader from Fairview, N.J. wrote to us this week: “If we are to believe that President Bush and the Christian Right have been talking directly to God these past six years, then it follows that this is God's answer to their agenda."

Oh, God's a Democrat? I see ....

Perhaps, then again, it could be argued that God is a Racist Republican that sent judgement, in as far as New Orleans, on a modern day 'Sodom".

I of course do not know if it's one or the other, but you can see how dumb comparisons can be made Mr. Dickey? Do you? Naw, I didn't think so.

If Mr. Dickey wanted to make a point, it's totally missed in his overt "hostility" to religion, specifically evangelical Christianity - which make no mistake is the ONLY reason for this "sucker punch" of a commentary.

Funny that writers of the left never disparge any other religion Christianty and Judiasm.

Again, what do you expect from someone who repeats his mantra of "Terroism is a social disease".

heh...

Try this Mr. Dickey, repeat after me, "Terrorist do what they do because they are evil".



Filed under

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Is the lid about to be blown off Able Danger?

Those who have been wishing for a full blown Able Danger investigation are about to get their wish. The "gate" has been unlocked.

9/11 Iraqi Connection

With Democrats calling for yet more investigations into pre-war intelligence, and Republicans like myself pushing back to help their 'sudden amnesia”, the growing stories of Able Danger and even China Gate, are beginning to make news.

The three main theories about why Able Danger hasn't gotten out of the "blog stage", are 1) To hide Clinton era responsibility for stopping the 9/11 attacks, and/or 2) To hide the truth behind China-Gate, or 3) The facts show that there in fact was a direct link between Iraq and 9/11.

Taking either one you can see why the Clinton worshipping MSM for the most part hasn't touched the story. Of the later point, Democrats, the MSM and even some of our investigations state that there was no 'direct' link between Iraq and 9/11. Say otherwise and the MSM will slice and di…

Able Danger - Pulling Back the Covers of the real Clinton Legacy

First, let's dispense with the bull crap. The meeting between Mohammed Atta and Iraqi Intelligence officer Al-Ani, on April 8th, 2001 happened.

Yet, just don't mention it to the MSM, becaue since May of 2002, the MSM declared an all out assault on the story. A meeting incidently, that the Czech government has to this date stood by.

Let's review a little history:

October 13, 2001: Story of the meeting is leaked from somewhere in the Czech foreign service.

yet.....

October 20, 2001: Ny Times, John Tagliabue writes a story citing other Czech officials said the meeting never took place.

so.....

October 26, 2001: Czech Minister of the Interior, Stanislav Gross has a press conference not only confirming the orginal report but giving further details of Atta's other trip to Prague in June 2000.

then.....

October 27, 2001: The NY Times "recants" the October 20th denial.

The story continues it's oddessy of 'back and forth' until May 1st, 2002, when Walter P…