Skip to main content

Hold that "Copy"!

If they were fakes, they'd say more

John Hinderaker of Powerlineblog attempts to cool the fire on the developing possibility that the Downing Street Memos are fakes.

A couple of points on his post:

"No one in the British Government has denied their authenticity."

This isn't exactly right. We don't know "who" denied the memos authenticity - they too are anonymous - we don't really know if "they" exist. No one in the British Government has actually come on record to say - "Yes, those memos are real". In fact it is quite the opposite.

The second point he tries to make, "they would say something better".

Again, not so fast. What else would they have to say? It seems that if they fake, they have served their intended purpose well - the intended audience (as it has appeared to be) is the very far left moonbats, to give them the "smoking gun" they desire to impeach President Bush. After all they are only focusing on only one word "fixed". It wouldn't seem that need more.

Before we all "jump" the gun, (fake or real), in the interest of "Truth" the journalist Mr. Smith needs to come forward and reveal his sources (not likely to happen), and in addition (a point I am working on) much more needs to be known about him - his "political preferences".

Sorry, but bias in media has been proven before, and since we live in the post Rathergate days, further examination is needed before we put the flame out.

All Thing Conservative Blog echos the thought.


Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?


As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Is the lid about to be blown off Able Danger?

Those who have been wishing for a full blown Able Danger investigation are about to get their wish. The "gate" has been unlocked.

9/11 Iraqi Connection

With Democrats calling for yet more investigations into pre-war intelligence, and Republicans like myself pushing back to help their 'sudden amnesia”, the growing stories of Able Danger and even China Gate, are beginning to make news.

The three main theories about why Able Danger hasn't gotten out of the "blog stage", are 1) To hide Clinton era responsibility for stopping the 9/11 attacks, and/or 2) To hide the truth behind China-Gate, or 3) The facts show that there in fact was a direct link between Iraq and 9/11.

Taking either one you can see why the Clinton worshipping MSM for the most part hasn't touched the story. Of the later point, Democrats, the MSM and even some of our investigations state that there was no 'direct' link between Iraq and 9/11. Say otherwise and the MSM will slice and di…

Able Danger - Pulling Back the Covers of the real Clinton Legacy

First, let's dispense with the bull crap. The meeting between Mohammed Atta and Iraqi Intelligence officer Al-Ani, on April 8th, 2001 happened.

Yet, just don't mention it to the MSM, becaue since May of 2002, the MSM declared an all out assault on the story. A meeting incidently, that the Czech government has to this date stood by.

Let's review a little history:

October 13, 2001: Story of the meeting is leaked from somewhere in the Czech foreign service.


October 20, 2001: Ny Times, John Tagliabue writes a story citing other Czech officials said the meeting never took place.


October 26, 2001: Czech Minister of the Interior, Stanislav Gross has a press conference not only confirming the orginal report but giving further details of Atta's other trip to Prague in June 2000.


October 27, 2001: The NY Times "recants" the October 20th denial.

The story continues it's oddessy of 'back and forth' until May 1st, 2002, when Walter P…