Skip to main content

Newsweek and the facts (Copy that Memo)

Newsweek this week reports on the "Downing Street Memo(s)", and the supposed "Rift" between the Brits and US in the days before the war in Iraq. Memos which incidently don't exist except in a "transcript" form. As I posted below , Mr. Michael Smith, a journalist in the UK transcribed the memos he said he got from a "source" and then "destroyed" the originals.

Again from the AP: "Smith told AP he protected the identity of the source he had obtained the documents from by typing copies of them on plain paper and destroying the originals."

Just a small sentence in a big article touting the memos, but an important one. Why hasn't this fact been mentioned before in all the other media reports?

In essence the story shouldn't be around the memos, but first around the integrity of a Mr. Michael Smith. After RaThErGaTe , I would think that Newsweek writers would have mentioned this fact in their piece - especially after setting the Middle East aflame with their lack of "quality control" in the past. In a day when the MSM is under increased scrunity about bias and getting the facts wrong, I would think they would be a little gun shy about not getting the "source" straight.

You know, for this old journalist dog, and I guess I'm 'old school, but there seems to be a whole lot of reporting but not a lot of investigating going on. Journalism 101 - "Get the facts; verify the facts; write the story based on the facts".

I'm not doubting Mr. Smith or his motives or his journalistic integrity. But I am saying that without originals, "copies" made by a journalist should not be taken without a grain of proverbial salt thrown over the shoulder. Quite frankly I give no credence to any "evidence" not backed by orginals.

More on this breaking story at Captains Quarters Blog .


Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?


As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Is the lid about to be blown off Able Danger?

Those who have been wishing for a full blown Able Danger investigation are about to get their wish. The "gate" has been unlocked.

9/11 Iraqi Connection

With Democrats calling for yet more investigations into pre-war intelligence, and Republicans like myself pushing back to help their 'sudden amnesia”, the growing stories of Able Danger and even China Gate, are beginning to make news.

The three main theories about why Able Danger hasn't gotten out of the "blog stage", are 1) To hide Clinton era responsibility for stopping the 9/11 attacks, and/or 2) To hide the truth behind China-Gate, or 3) The facts show that there in fact was a direct link between Iraq and 9/11.

Taking either one you can see why the Clinton worshipping MSM for the most part hasn't touched the story. Of the later point, Democrats, the MSM and even some of our investigations state that there was no 'direct' link between Iraq and 9/11. Say otherwise and the MSM will slice and di…

Able Danger - Pulling Back the Covers of the real Clinton Legacy

First, let's dispense with the bull crap. The meeting between Mohammed Atta and Iraqi Intelligence officer Al-Ani, on April 8th, 2001 happened.

Yet, just don't mention it to the MSM, becaue since May of 2002, the MSM declared an all out assault on the story. A meeting incidently, that the Czech government has to this date stood by.

Let's review a little history:

October 13, 2001: Story of the meeting is leaked from somewhere in the Czech foreign service.


October 20, 2001: Ny Times, John Tagliabue writes a story citing other Czech officials said the meeting never took place.


October 26, 2001: Czech Minister of the Interior, Stanislav Gross has a press conference not only confirming the orginal report but giving further details of Atta's other trip to Prague in June 2000.


October 27, 2001: The NY Times "recants" the October 20th denial.

The story continues it's oddessy of 'back and forth' until May 1st, 2002, when Walter P…