Skip to main content

Quran Mania


Quran Mania
Originally uploaded by macsmind.
The Pentagon released it's report on "Quran Abuse" tonight here's the scoop:

Five total cases of Quran "abuse" were found.

Yet there was not one shred of evidence that a Quran was flushed down a toilet except by a detainee. However, a soldier did kick a Quran - Don't know if it went "wide right".

In another case guards were throwing water balloons - having some fun - near a cell and a few Qurans got wet.

In another instance an interrogator stepped on a Koran during interrogation (intentional? Deliberate? Big feet?)

Another soldier peed near an air vent and it inadvertently sprayed on a Quran and another wrote a dirty word or two in another (but it isn't known who wrote it - could have been a detainee.



Well slap me with a trout! Is this IT? Talk about "straining out a gnat and swallowing a camel!"

Now I don't condone any kind of disrepect - it isn't necessary - yet I do think this is much to do about nothing. Now we are switching from "abuse of prisoners" to "abuse of an inanimate object - a book!" What's next?

(AP) Detainee's Not Allowed Charmin Toilet Paper - Inspectors discovered that detainee's have to use government issued toilet paper which is known to cause friction burns......

Ridiculous? Yeah, but that it what this nitpicking is getting to. Every dot and every "T" being checked.

So punish the soldiers involved and move on.

Once again the US shows that it looks into even the silliest allegations and gets to the bottom of things (most of these events were over 2 years ago and have been corrected). It's too bad that Radical Muslims and most of their cahorts in MSM will no doubt incite the crowds to riot now.

Oh, and by the way, did I mention that in Saudi Arabia they will burn a Bible if they find one on you? Not 'pee on it" or even throw a water balloon at it, they will BURN IT, and might even remove your head in some circumstances.

Reality check is needed here. Detainees are there because they want to KILL US. Oh well, that doesn't matter now does it New York Times or P_MSNBC. People let's wake up -we're at war here.

UPDATE: As predicted the MSM is being selective about how they are reporting these revelations. Here is an interesting 'charge' from the NY Times which typifies biased and attack reporting.

"The military released the findings of the investigation about 7:15 p.m., Eastern time, well after the broadcasts of the network television evening news programs. A Pentagon spokesman, Bryan Whitman, denied that the military was trying to bury bad news late on a Friday night, a tactic often used by government agencies. "It was completed and we try not to hold these things after their reviews are completed," Mr. Whitman said in a telephone interview."

"A tactic used by Government agencies" How about YOU guys picking both Friday nights and especially Sunday night to NUKE sitting presidents just for effect? Cowards and hypocrites. Where is the coverage of five detainees desecrating their own Qurans? Nope didn't think so! Michelle Malkin is doing a bang up job of covering the MSM's NON coverage of the important facts

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Is the lid about to be blown off Able Danger?

Those who have been wishing for a full blown Able Danger investigation are about to get their wish. The "gate" has been unlocked.

9/11 Iraqi Connection

With Democrats calling for yet more investigations into pre-war intelligence, and Republicans like myself pushing back to help their 'sudden amnesia”, the growing stories of Able Danger and even China Gate, are beginning to make news.

The three main theories about why Able Danger hasn't gotten out of the "blog stage", are 1) To hide Clinton era responsibility for stopping the 9/11 attacks, and/or 2) To hide the truth behind China-Gate, or 3) The facts show that there in fact was a direct link between Iraq and 9/11.

Taking either one you can see why the Clinton worshipping MSM for the most part hasn't touched the story. Of the later point, Democrats, the MSM and even some of our investigations state that there was no 'direct' link between Iraq and 9/11. Say otherwise and the MSM will slice and di…

Able Danger - Pulling Back the Covers of the real Clinton Legacy

First, let's dispense with the bull crap. The meeting between Mohammed Atta and Iraqi Intelligence officer Al-Ani, on April 8th, 2001 happened.

Yet, just don't mention it to the MSM, becaue since May of 2002, the MSM declared an all out assault on the story. A meeting incidently, that the Czech government has to this date stood by.

Let's review a little history:

October 13, 2001: Story of the meeting is leaked from somewhere in the Czech foreign service.

yet.....

October 20, 2001: Ny Times, John Tagliabue writes a story citing other Czech officials said the meeting never took place.

so.....

October 26, 2001: Czech Minister of the Interior, Stanislav Gross has a press conference not only confirming the orginal report but giving further details of Atta's other trip to Prague in June 2000.

then.....

October 27, 2001: The NY Times "recants" the October 20th denial.

The story continues it's oddessy of 'back and forth' until May 1st, 2002, when Walter P…