Skip to main content

Being "Real" about our own Security

London attacks fuel debate over U.S. transit security

Excerpt:

"Debate erupted Thursday over federal funding for U.S. mass transit security after four bombs in London ripped through several commuter subway trains and one bus, killing at least 37 people and injuring hundreds more.

London authorities said the bombs appeared to be a coordinated terrorist attack, but did not know whether suicide bombers set them off or whether bombs had been left in packages."

As I sat in traffic this morning behind a county transit bus, I watched people get on and off. Two or three of them with backpacks. There was no percievable security. I thought, "How hard would it be to someone - anyone, "pack" their backpack with explosives and set it off while on the bus?

Not much. Take a look around you as you go about your day. Look at people on the bus, at the mall, the Wendy's, McDonalds, etc. Not all terrorists look like the "poster" child for Al Qaeda. Today's Al Qaeda isn't the one of 9/11. Today there are hundreds if not thousands of splinter cells throughout the world.

Today wasn't the first time I noticed this "laspe". One day while shopping at the local mall, where it is usually shoulder-to-shoulder people, I noticed many people wearing such packs, or carrying large bags. I saw bags lying alone, packages that may have been innocent enough, yet they were just sitting there. Yes, there were some police and mall security, but in the several hours I was there I didn't see one instance of bag check, or even an interview, and even past my protestations they didn't seem too concerned about the packages.

Again, "How hard could it be?"

When we talk "beefing up security", we are a bit naive to think that we can secure every instance in every place. Terrorist don't try to attack when we expect it. Who thought on a clear cool day in New York City that planes would be used as missles?

Who thought that after one of the most happiest days in London, the next could be the most sad?

Terrorists don't always plan a "grand-scale" attack. One terrorist with a device in a backpack is all it takes.

"We have asked state and local leaders and transportation officials to increase their protective measures, including additional law enforcement police, bomb-detecting K-9 teams, increased video surveillance, spot-testing in certain areas, added perimeter barriers, extra intrusion-detection equipment, and increased numbers of inspection of trash receptacles and other storage areas," Chertoff said during a news conference. "But we are not suggesting that people avoid public transportation systems. Rather, we are asking that they use those systems, but with an increased awareness of their surroundings."

While we can fund the hell out of homeland security, and improve all the measures mentioned above, the last sentence tells us the greatest defense we have: That we become more aware of our surroundings. We are at war - today was not the first nor last time these monsters will show their "values".

The government is charged with protecting us, and as far as I am concerned, since 9/11 they have done a stellar job. But like it or not they can't be everywhere, seeing everything, 24/7. It just isn't possible.

Yet we as individuals, Americans are everywhere, doing everything, and if we want to stay safe, we HAVE to be diligent. We have to be aware, lest when we least expect it, terror comes home.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Is the lid about to be blown off Able Danger?

Those who have been wishing for a full blown Able Danger investigation are about to get their wish. The "gate" has been unlocked.

9/11 Iraqi Connection

With Democrats calling for yet more investigations into pre-war intelligence, and Republicans like myself pushing back to help their 'sudden amnesia”, the growing stories of Able Danger and even China Gate, are beginning to make news.

The three main theories about why Able Danger hasn't gotten out of the "blog stage", are 1) To hide Clinton era responsibility for stopping the 9/11 attacks, and/or 2) To hide the truth behind China-Gate, or 3) The facts show that there in fact was a direct link between Iraq and 9/11.

Taking either one you can see why the Clinton worshipping MSM for the most part hasn't touched the story. Of the later point, Democrats, the MSM and even some of our investigations state that there was no 'direct' link between Iraq and 9/11. Say otherwise and the MSM will slice and di…

Monday Morning Intelligence with Kool Aid and the NY Times - UPDATE

Followup to previous post.

NY Times: 9/11 Commission's Staff Rejected Report on Early Identification of Chief Hijacker

Ok, I've been on the phone now for...oh, about three days, to some old chums in Tampa, checking this story out, asking questions,...etc. So far what I've heard is that IF this story is true, then those who are really in the know in the Intel world are feeling like a bunch of little red-hair step-childred.

Ed. Morissey is ready to hang the 911 Commission out to dry......mmm,

Ed, not so fast my friend.

Again, I am amazed at the vercacity the NY Times and AP is getting on this story, and from the same conservative bloggers who are normally parsing every "dot and tittle" the Times puts out. Who would think?...

Yeah, there is a lot of "anger" because of "Gorelick" fever where the blogshere and conservative media rightfully called attention to her conflict of interest while serving on the commission. But we can't let the "gotc…