Skip to main content

Fox News - It's John Roberts

Fox News Alert

Heh, heh....."Rove who"....heh, heh...

"we continue to believe that Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided and should be overruled."

Let's rumble!!

Welcome Blogs for Bush readers, shop around! Goes for you lurkers too!

****************************************************************************************

Robert's bio here

MoveOn.org still touting "Fire Rove" Commercial.......(yawn)

President Bush THANK YOU for keeping your promise!

***************************************************************************************
Running updates below

NOW: "Bush Picks Anti-Roe Judge...Women's Lives on the Line"

NOW - Propaganda about Judge Roberts here.

My, my, we ARE so angry!

Michelle Malkin is keeping track of updates.

Hugh Hewitt a must read.

Hugh: "It may be too much to hope for, but it is possible that Senate Democrats will not try to destroy Roberts because they will realize they can't. The left's hard core will not be happy, but those Gang of 14 Dems must know that Roberts presents no vulnerabilities at all, much less those that rise to the level of "extraordianry circumstances."

Oh, Oh...Leaky Pants Leahy and Chucky Cheese Schumer are speaking on Fox News. Yep, they are gearing up for a fight all right!

Leaky - Criteria for the Supreme Court are different that of the Appellate Court". Leaky, is saying "No questions are off limit".

Chucky - Only has two years on the bench......personal views unknown.....must answer a WIDE range of questions......The BURDEN IS ON THE NOMINEE. I voted against Roberts when he came up to the appellate, because he didn't answer my quesitons....(sic).

Do you think that Leaky and Chucky will remember the "Ginsberg Rule".......NOT!!

Durbin, is throwing down the gauntlet......also voted against Roberts before.

WHO CARES - These dopes aren't going to vote for him anyway. Damn it's good to win elections!

Via the Corner: "NO DOWNSIDE" [Rich Lowry]

"Quick take from someone monitoring how it will play politically: “Roberts and Luttig were the most-qualified possibilities. Roberts is brilliant and solid. He has a good temperment and he's very likable. There's no downside. Fred Thompson is going to have a very easy time bringing him around. And Bush has kept his promise to nominate someone in the mold of Scalia and Thomas. It probably helps that he's already been here in Washington, the way Scalia and Thomas were. He's not going to 'grow' here.”

Bill Kristal on Fox: "Roberts could move to the Chief slot if and when it opens"....hmmmmmm

Heh, Planned Parenthood is "concerned".

Captain Ed is a faster typer than me! He's got the TV on and pecking away!

National Clergy Council is pleased.

Alliance for Justice? is not. A quote from their press release:

""One wonders why, unlike some reported to have been on the president's short list, Judge Roberts has the support of not only mainstream conservatives, but the radical right as well."

Ooo, oooh, I can answer. First he promised to do it, second we elected him because he promised, third, he kept his promise. What's so difficult to understand?

Darn it! I should have put fifty-bucks on Roberts!

Sorry MoveOn.org, that "dog" won't bite.

Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG), promises a fight. Heh, you know what I'm thinking, but I won't mention it.

Aaron Brown on CNN looks like he's going to cry. Now CNN is talking about his abortion views, the Florida Recount....sheesh!

By the way, anyone hear Joe Wilson's take on the nomination? Just wondering...

Senator Killer Kennedy comments here.

Excerpt:

"This is a critical moment for this country's future. If John Roberts is confirmed, he will have a vital role in setting the direction of the country for generations to come. (Yaawwwn!)

The Supreme Court is often the last line of defense for the freedoms and liberties for hundreds of millions of Americans. Few responsibilities of the Senate are more important than reviewing the qualifications of nominees for the Supreme Court. Every Senator, Republican or Democrats, has a responsibility to determine whether Mr. Roberts deserves to join the currently closely divided court when so much is at stake. It¹s wrong for any Senator to be a rubberstamp."


Darn, another "Ney" vote!......heh

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Is the lid about to be blown off Able Danger?

Those who have been wishing for a full blown Able Danger investigation are about to get their wish. The "gate" has been unlocked.

9/11 Iraqi Connection

With Democrats calling for yet more investigations into pre-war intelligence, and Republicans like myself pushing back to help their 'sudden amnesia”, the growing stories of Able Danger and even China Gate, are beginning to make news.

The three main theories about why Able Danger hasn't gotten out of the "blog stage", are 1) To hide Clinton era responsibility for stopping the 9/11 attacks, and/or 2) To hide the truth behind China-Gate, or 3) The facts show that there in fact was a direct link between Iraq and 9/11.

Taking either one you can see why the Clinton worshipping MSM for the most part hasn't touched the story. Of the later point, Democrats, the MSM and even some of our investigations state that there was no 'direct' link between Iraq and 9/11. Say otherwise and the MSM will slice and di…

Able Danger - Pulling Back the Covers of the real Clinton Legacy

First, let's dispense with the bull crap. The meeting between Mohammed Atta and Iraqi Intelligence officer Al-Ani, on April 8th, 2001 happened.

Yet, just don't mention it to the MSM, becaue since May of 2002, the MSM declared an all out assault on the story. A meeting incidently, that the Czech government has to this date stood by.

Let's review a little history:

October 13, 2001: Story of the meeting is leaked from somewhere in the Czech foreign service.

yet.....

October 20, 2001: Ny Times, John Tagliabue writes a story citing other Czech officials said the meeting never took place.

so.....

October 26, 2001: Czech Minister of the Interior, Stanislav Gross has a press conference not only confirming the orginal report but giving further details of Atta's other trip to Prague in June 2000.

then.....

October 27, 2001: The NY Times "recants" the October 20th denial.

The story continues it's oddessy of 'back and forth' until May 1st, 2002, when Walter P…