Skip to main content

Liberal Loser News - "Sinclair is Not Fair!"


After 50 years of monopoly on MSM, the left is crying foul at the coming predominance of "right wing" broadcasting.

Moveon.org touts Sinclar Action which is trying force Sinclair Broadcasting's "The Point" with Mark Hyman to have a "counterpoint" view. Since obviously Sinclair has refused to this point, the Sinclair Action has started it's own counterpoint.

Here is a "Waaaah" blurb from their site:

"On every nightly "local" newscast, Sinclair-owned and -operated stations are required to broadcast "The Point," a two-minute "news and commentary" segment of one-sided conservative commentary by Mark Hyman, Sinclair's vice president for corporate relations. "The Point" is part of a larger package of content that is broadcast from News Central, Sinclair's Maryland-based nerve center, and integrated into all of the "local" evening newscasts on Sinclair-controlled stations. "The Point" is currently presented on Sinclair stations without any balance or counterpoint.

According to a 2004 Baltimore Sun article, "roughly 1.8 million American adults" watch "The Point" every day. Hyman's biography on the News Central website puts the figure at 2.5 million viewers. According to the Sun, even the lower figure "puts him in the company of far-better known pundits," including FOX News Channel hosts Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity.

On "The Point", Hyman makes baseless attacks on those who hold different opinions from his, promotes pending Republican legislation, and consistently presents one-sided conservative rhetoric (much of which is similar to Republican talking points on issues ranging from Social Security to Medicare). During the 2004 election cycle, Hyman consistently provided false and distortion-filled attacks on Democratic candidate John Kerry." (sniff, sniff - "dirty rotten rightwingers!)

We'll leave those "proven facts" about John Kerry for another time (btw, they were never discredited - but he was!).

Sinclair-Action's site is hilarious to say the least. They criticize Sinclair for only presenting one side (their right), but then the only "counter" arguments they offer are like the quote above - laced with venom.

The point is since when did it become "unlawful" to be right wing? Sinclair broadcasting you'll remember came under presure last year when it was reported that they would air "Stolen Honor". Left-wing groups flew into a rage and wrote the sponsors of Sinclair broadcasting to get them to provide a "counterpoint". Sinclair ended up showing the piece and added counter points - which is what they intended all along. Left-wing groups like MoveOn jumped the gun - typical.

Talk about censorship!

Of course the supposed "righer of rights" Media Matters is behind all of this. Started as a poor attempt to counter L. Brent Bozell's Media Research, they are simply nothing more than a George Soros propaganda project, although I had to dig to find that out as they are very secretive about their funding (for a reason). Media Reseach provide a full financial disclosurehere.

Again, typical for a leftwing hack organization. Come on! Show us the money if you're so "up front!"

Back to the point. Why doesn't Media Matters ever attack the LA Times, or the NY Times or C-BS, or NBC? Simple - those outlets are decidedly left wing in their reporting and approach, so they are no threat to the left at all.

You see they don't want "balance" they want to shut up the Right - it's that simple. Why? Because for the first time in 50 years the policies and agendas and socialist drivel of the left is being exposed for what it is - Anti-American bird poop!

All these efforts of their of course aren't having any affect. Conservative values are beginning to take over the airwaves the political landscape and soon the Supreme Court. They have lost their stranglehold on America and with our current momentum they are not going to get it back.

Not that they won't go without kicking and screaming. But it is absolutely hilarious to see them implode in the process.

"Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Is the lid about to be blown off Able Danger?

Those who have been wishing for a full blown Able Danger investigation are about to get their wish. The "gate" has been unlocked.

9/11 Iraqi Connection

With Democrats calling for yet more investigations into pre-war intelligence, and Republicans like myself pushing back to help their 'sudden amnesia”, the growing stories of Able Danger and even China Gate, are beginning to make news.

The three main theories about why Able Danger hasn't gotten out of the "blog stage", are 1) To hide Clinton era responsibility for stopping the 9/11 attacks, and/or 2) To hide the truth behind China-Gate, or 3) The facts show that there in fact was a direct link between Iraq and 9/11.

Taking either one you can see why the Clinton worshipping MSM for the most part hasn't touched the story. Of the later point, Democrats, the MSM and even some of our investigations state that there was no 'direct' link between Iraq and 9/11. Say otherwise and the MSM will slice and di…

Monday Morning Intelligence with Kool Aid and the NY Times - UPDATE

Followup to previous post.

NY Times: 9/11 Commission's Staff Rejected Report on Early Identification of Chief Hijacker

Ok, I've been on the phone now for...oh, about three days, to some old chums in Tampa, checking this story out, asking questions,...etc. So far what I've heard is that IF this story is true, then those who are really in the know in the Intel world are feeling like a bunch of little red-hair step-childred.

Ed. Morissey is ready to hang the 911 Commission out to dry......mmm,

Ed, not so fast my friend.

Again, I am amazed at the vercacity the NY Times and AP is getting on this story, and from the same conservative bloggers who are normally parsing every "dot and tittle" the Times puts out. Who would think?...

Yeah, there is a lot of "anger" because of "Gorelick" fever where the blogshere and conservative media rightfully called attention to her conflict of interest while serving on the commission. But we can't let the "gotc…