Skip to main content

Media "Bias" Matters

Fox News slammed over 'callous' line

According to the Guardian (which isn't exactly an unbiased paper - constantly refers to Fox as "That Right-Wing News Organization"), Media Matters, ("That George Soros News Organization"), is furious at Fox (what else is new - it's the only network they pick on) because these statements of Fox anchors which they thought were "callous" in light of the London Terrorist Attack:

"Brit Hume, the channel's Washington managing editor, said: "Just on a personal basis ... I saw the futures this morning, which were really in the tank, I thought 'hmm, time to buy'."

The host of a Fox News programme, Brian Kilmeade, said the attacks had the effect of putting terrorism back on the top of the G8's agenda, in place of global warming and African aid. "I think that works to our advantage, in the western world's advantage, for people to experience something like this together, just 500 miles from where the attacks have happened."

Another Fox News host, John Gibson, said before the blasts that the International Olympic Committee "missed a golden opportunity" by not awarding the 2012 games to France. "If they had picked France instead of London to hold the Olympics, it would have been the one time we could look forward to where we didn't worry about terrorism. They'd blow up Paris, and who cares?" He added: "This is why I thought the Brits should let the French have the Olympics - let somebody else be worried about guys with backpack bombs for a while."

(Note: he said this before the blasts?) Gibson is a firecracker, and maybe it was bad taste, but it is his "My Word" which is an opinion piece. MM would have you think he had some foreknowledge about the attacks.

Oh, Btw - Screw France.

MM's take: ""I think it's absolutely sickening three Fox anchors had such callous reactions to the bombings that took dozens of lives," said the Jamison Foser, of the group."

Jamison is former Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (2002). In otherword a DNC bulldog. Nope, no bias there!

Take a chill pill dude. Better yet, can you finally send me that "funding statement" I wrote you about, oh, three months ago? What in the heck is sooo secretive about who pays the bills over there at Media Matters??"

I digress...

For one I was watching Brit that night in question, in context the dialog isn't anywhere near as "sinister" as MM would have you believe, as Brit was talking with Neil Cavuto about possible market impact - a valid concern.

Brian was right - keeping aware of terrorism is much more important than sinking another fifty billion bucks into Africa ($560 Billion has already went down the tubes there!)

I wonder, where in the hell is MM's ranting all this time the MSM has been blaming 9/11 on America?

Better yet, how come these comments by MSM pundits made after the London terrorists attacks doesn't get Mr. Jamisons dandruff up?

NY Times Alan Cowell: “The war in Iraq has been increasingly unpopular here, with taunts that Mr. Blair had become President Bush's poodle. The anger about Iraq led to Mr. Blair's shaky showing in the May elections: a third term with a severely reduced majority. Now, as long predicted and feared, his support of the war appears to have cost British lives at home. Thursday was a day of rallying behind the leader, but there were indications that the bombing could take a political toll.”

Today's Katie Couric, speaking to Michael Chertoff of DHS, reading straight from a Democratic talking points about budget cuts to HLS.

She said, "Is that appropriate, Mr. Secretary, a $50 million cut, given what happened in London yesterday and what happened in Madrid before that?"

Oh, so the left can make political points on the back of tragety, and bash Blair and Bush, the war in Iraq and Terror and get a free pass from MM? But they get huffed at these petty comments?

(Post Script: I have filed a freedom of information act request to obtain a complete donor list for Media Matters. Post the info when I get it!)


Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?


As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Is the lid about to be blown off Able Danger?

Those who have been wishing for a full blown Able Danger investigation are about to get their wish. The "gate" has been unlocked.

9/11 Iraqi Connection

With Democrats calling for yet more investigations into pre-war intelligence, and Republicans like myself pushing back to help their 'sudden amnesia”, the growing stories of Able Danger and even China Gate, are beginning to make news.

The three main theories about why Able Danger hasn't gotten out of the "blog stage", are 1) To hide Clinton era responsibility for stopping the 9/11 attacks, and/or 2) To hide the truth behind China-Gate, or 3) The facts show that there in fact was a direct link between Iraq and 9/11.

Taking either one you can see why the Clinton worshipping MSM for the most part hasn't touched the story. Of the later point, Democrats, the MSM and even some of our investigations state that there was no 'direct' link between Iraq and 9/11. Say otherwise and the MSM will slice and di…

Monday Morning Intelligence with Kool Aid and the NY Times - UPDATE

Followup to previous post.

NY Times: 9/11 Commission's Staff Rejected Report on Early Identification of Chief Hijacker

Ok, I've been on the phone now for...oh, about three days, to some old chums in Tampa, checking this story out, asking questions,...etc. So far what I've heard is that IF this story is true, then those who are really in the know in the Intel world are feeling like a bunch of little red-hair step-childred.

Ed. Morissey is ready to hang the 911 Commission out to dry......mmm,

Ed, not so fast my friend.

Again, I am amazed at the vercacity the NY Times and AP is getting on this story, and from the same conservative bloggers who are normally parsing every "dot and tittle" the Times puts out. Who would think?...

Yeah, there is a lot of "anger" because of "Gorelick" fever where the blogshere and conservative media rightfully called attention to her conflict of interest while serving on the commission. But we can't let the "gotc…