Skip to main content

Oh, Oh....Wilsonian moment must have hit a nerve!

Reading two liberal blogs; America's Blog and "factsmachine" (clearing throat..), You see the both spining the Wilson "opps" moment on CNN so fast the wheels of sanity are coming off.

Both are picking up up on the Wilson's explaination on Friday that, "I didn't mean that, I meant this...I must have misspoken..." crap.

Both are panning Drudge for "twisting" poor little Joseph's words out of context. Well let's review for a moment, this transcript from the CNN interview.

"BLITZER: But the other argument that's been made against you is that you've sought to capitalize on this extravaganza, having that photo shoot with your wife, who was a clandestine officer of the CIA, and that you've tried to enrich yourself writing this book and all of that.

What do you make of those accusations, which are serious accusations, as you know, that have been leveled against you.

WILSON: My wife was not a clandestine officer the day that Bob Novak blew her identity.

BLITZER: But she hadn't been a clandestine officer for some time before that?

WILSON: That's not anything that I can talk about. And, indeed, I'll go back to what I said earlier, the CIA believed that a possible crime had been committed, and that's why they referred it to the Justice Department.

She was not a clandestine officer at the time that that article in Vanity Fair appeared. And I have every right to have the American public know who I am and not to have myself defined by those who would write the sorts of things that are coming out, being spewed out of the mouths of the RNC..."

Well he did talk about her "status" in his book and on numerous other interviews. Notice he didn't say, "On the day", he said, THE day - meaning she wasn't then a covert op, and as USA Today revealed, she hadn't been for a while.

I do believe this guy has a pathological disorder and it looks like it's spreading...

On another site, "Crooks and Liars" (I thought at first by the name it was the Bill Clinton Library site), there is post about where Lawrence (liar, lair, pants on fire!) O'Donnell is supposedly refutes the Wilson opps moment.

"On KCRW, Left, Right and Center, Tony Blankley tried to use the new trick of Valeri not being an active operative in the CIA by using Joe WIlson's Wolf Blitzer segment. Lawrence O'Donnell corrects Blankley by making the obvious point that Valeri Plame had to be an operative or else there would be no case:


Here’s what I think is definitive on this question. Patrick Fitzgerald has represented to the courts that he is pursuing a serious, national security, criminal violation. It seems to me in this grand jury, witness number one -- and Tony you’ve been a prosecutor, you know how they assemble cases -- witness number one would have been a CIA administrator who comes in and testifies about how Valerie Plame does indeed fit the law’s requirements. Because if witness number one doesn’t do that successfully for the prosecutor, there is absolutely no reason to call witness number two, because there is no crime to investigate."

First, Lawrence doesn't have a clue what's going on in that investigation. If you want to cite experts, pick the ones who have been all over the airwaves, two of which actually help draft the law, who state Valerie did not meet the criteria.

The fact that there is so much "damage control" going on about the Wilsonian Slip, is proof it really upset the "Valerie was a covert dammit!" Argument. Because it pretty much slams the door on the original point of the investigation, Wilson was all over the place on Friday trying to say, "What I said is not what you heard, which is not what I meant" drool. Sounds like Clinton's "depends on what sex means"; these guys never cease to amaze me!

Which leads to the belief by myself and many others that Fitzgerald has gone beyond the original scope. A Grand Jury isn't a trial, it is an "investigation in progress" and as such is fluid with new things being discovered. Again, if I were Wilson I might want to shut up for now. As for Valerie - did she go 'under' again? I mean, this lady hasn't been anywhere to be seen. Her husband is out there, her 'friends' are out there...

"Absense is the sign of guilt" a prosecutor told me once....


Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?


As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Able Danger - Sign Up - Get the Truth

Per the Able Danger Blog (newly added link), get over to this petition and sign ur name. Again, if there is any chance of true bi-partisan hearings, the people are going to have to speak up and loud.

Just do it!

Newsbusters Busts the MSM on Bush Event

Newsbusters, the blog of Brent Bozell's Media Research Center, exposes the MSM attempt to spin President Bush's meeting with troops into a 'staged event'.

Truth is that the event was not staged, the troops were telling their real feelings: that they support the war and our President.

I guess they might have this story mixed up with the "planted question" to Sec. Rumsfeld back in December 2004.

Yet, that wasn't the case here, Soldiers when asked, will tell you the truth.

Just like in this picture, they tell it like it is!

Michelle Malkin has links to other reactions. Also Blogs for Bush.

UPDATE I: Michelle has a further reponse from one of the soldiers in the video. Here's an excerpt:

"First of all, we were told that we would be speaking with the President of the United States, our Commander-in-Chief, President Bush, so I believe that it would have been totally irresponsible for us NOT to prepare some ideas, facts or comments that we wanted to share …