Skip to main content

Plame Game Question of the Day:

The first of a continuing series of questions I have looked at in investigating the Plame Game

For today: "What do Time Magazine Reporter, Matt Cooper, his wife,Mandy Grumwald, Joe Wilson and John Kerry have in common?"

The answer is for now, I don't know. For instance I do know that for a while there in the 2004 election, Joe was John's 'man". Mr. Kerry held Joe up in high esteem - even paid for his website "restorehonesty.com" (giggle). Notice the bottom, "Paid for by John Kerry for President" at the bottom.

So everything was smooth between them until Joe got caught with his lies in the teacup then "woosh", all reference to Joe from John Kerry's site, campaign and even Joe's website itself, were gone.

Could it be that Mr. Kerry got rid of Joe not because of the lies, and the potential damage to his campaign, but because something he knew about Joe's trip to Niger, that after Joe became "damaged goods", he wanted to distance himself as far as possible?

Of course that is speculation. But as I look this thing, there are too many "coincidences" to count. After all Matt Cooper's wife is Mandy Grunwald - Democratic adviser to Hillary Clinton and to the Kerry Campaign. Although not a crime, it still itself would bring Matt Cooper's objectivity under a little bit of scutiny in my book. Especially when it has come to light that he made all the phone calls in the first place.

As you know I've been looking over this from the theory that the whole Niger visit business was in fact a plot by rogue anti-iraq-invasion operatives in the CIA. I have some experience in Va, and I'll tell you that for a desk jocket analysist to even try to recommend anyone for anything and get it high enough up the chain is impossible, EXCEPT if you are "helped along" by some of the chain.

I'm getting some information together now on that - you wouldn't believe how many of my old contacts are yaking about this up in Va. One told me there is a little nervous apprehension that the "walls could come tumbling down" over this whole deal - we'll have to wait and see.

What also remains to be seen is who else get's caught in the net. Like I said before, Mr. Cooper, Wilson and other "subjects" are out on the airwaves talking it up, which is legal, but not wise. Liberals are crying, "How come Rove isn't out there?", and the answer is that he was asked specifically by Fitzgerald not to talk, which is actually a good sign nothing is coming down on Rove. From my own LE days, when a prosecutor tells you that it usually indicates a potential prosecution witness instead of a subject or even target OF the investigation. But again, we'll have to wait and see.

Just to qualify something. I am not so rabid conservative that IF someone in the administration broke the law they shouldn't go down and fast. I'm not throwing "theories" out there just to get Rove off. If Rove did something wrong, I would call him on it. It's a matter of principle with me. But from the beginning of this something just hasn't seemed right. It's all "too easy" - set ups are usually that way.

It's no secret now that there have been many plots before to discredit this President (Rathergate is one), and there have been more. In some 30 years of following politics I have never seen such an onslaught on one political figure, from the media, hollywood, political organizations, authors, etc. Yet they all came and went, none of them stuck, and some like Rathergate were blantant lies. Yet honesty survives.

I admire the President's courage - yes courage, others would have crumbled by now. If it comes to giving someone benefit of the doubt, I'm giving mine to President Bush. On the other hand I have no truck with a proven liar and hack like Joseph Wilson. I won't rest until I see that sonofabitch frogmarched. Mark my words.

Anyway, back to work.

Note: if you have any info, tips, etc, leave a comment or email me through the bio.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Is the lid about to be blown off Able Danger?

Those who have been wishing for a full blown Able Danger investigation are about to get their wish. The "gate" has been unlocked.

9/11 Iraqi Connection

With Democrats calling for yet more investigations into pre-war intelligence, and Republicans like myself pushing back to help their 'sudden amnesia”, the growing stories of Able Danger and even China Gate, are beginning to make news.

The three main theories about why Able Danger hasn't gotten out of the "blog stage", are 1) To hide Clinton era responsibility for stopping the 9/11 attacks, and/or 2) To hide the truth behind China-Gate, or 3) The facts show that there in fact was a direct link between Iraq and 9/11.

Taking either one you can see why the Clinton worshipping MSM for the most part hasn't touched the story. Of the later point, Democrats, the MSM and even some of our investigations state that there was no 'direct' link between Iraq and 9/11. Say otherwise and the MSM will slice and di…

Able Danger - Pulling Back the Covers of the real Clinton Legacy

First, let's dispense with the bull crap. The meeting between Mohammed Atta and Iraqi Intelligence officer Al-Ani, on April 8th, 2001 happened.

Yet, just don't mention it to the MSM, becaue since May of 2002, the MSM declared an all out assault on the story. A meeting incidently, that the Czech government has to this date stood by.

Let's review a little history:

October 13, 2001: Story of the meeting is leaked from somewhere in the Czech foreign service.

yet.....

October 20, 2001: Ny Times, John Tagliabue writes a story citing other Czech officials said the meeting never took place.

so.....

October 26, 2001: Czech Minister of the Interior, Stanislav Gross has a press conference not only confirming the orginal report but giving further details of Atta's other trip to Prague in June 2000.

then.....

October 27, 2001: The NY Times "recants" the October 20th denial.

The story continues it's oddessy of 'back and forth' until May 1st, 2002, when Walter P…