Skip to main content

Pride before the Fall

Newsweek: Howard Fineman: The Plame Game

Ya know? The Lefties are flaming me. "Cut out the CIA conspiracy crap! Rove's going down!"

Indeed....

In 2003, Howard Fineman explores the rift between the CIA and the Bush Adminisration. Apart from Fineman's annoying anti-Bush rhetoric, he does make this point:

"The CIA sends Wilson to check it out. On the surface, he would seem to be a logical choice: he'd spent years in Africa, knew French, knew the Saddam regime. But there were other things about him that Cheney's office might not have liked. Wilson had close ties to the Democrats, having worked for them on the Hill and on Clinton's national security staff; he was close to Democratic Sen. John Kerry and some other former NSC people who are now allies of the senator. Plus, he contributed to Al Gore's campaign in 2000. Just as important, his wife was a CIA analyst who specialized in assessing WMD risks and the CIA was not leading the charge to attack Iraq. In fact, the agency was doing just the opposite: In a report and testimony, CIA Director George Tenet argued that attacking Iraq would do more to create a generation of terrorists than eliminate one. What did Valerie Plame think of the seriousness of Saddam's WMD capability? Sooner or later, we ll find out because it bears on what Wilson probably thought before he ever got to Niger to ask questions."

I wanted to reference this in my post "Plame Game". It's content isn't exactly news - it's nearly two years old, but it does support my point that somehow the main "focus" of what everybody should have been looking into in this affair, wasn't because the total focus went off on this tangent of "Who leaked".

I have a theory. Everybody is asking, "What in the hell is taking Fitzgerald so damn long to complete this investigation?" Well even though it started as an investigation about a leak, I believe that it's gone WAY beyond that point. I mean I'm not a prosecutor, but I am former law enforcement, and just from what I have seen it doesn't take long to figure out that Valerie Plume's "outing" doesn't fit the parameters of a crime under the 1982 act. Something else is being looked at.

Perhaps we ARE going to know what transpired in the months before the war - specifically with Mr. Wilson, Valerie Plame and some members of the Intelligence committee.

Put it this way, if I were Mr. Wilson, I wouldn't be "out there" strutting around all proud and haughty, just yet.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Able Danger - Sign Up - Get the Truth

Per the Able Danger Blog (newly added link), get over to this petition and sign ur name. Again, if there is any chance of true bi-partisan hearings, the people are going to have to speak up and loud.

Just do it!



Newsbusters Busts the MSM on Bush Event

Newsbusters, the blog of Brent Bozell's Media Research Center, exposes the MSM attempt to spin President Bush's meeting with troops into a 'staged event'.

Truth is that the event was not staged, the troops were telling their real feelings: that they support the war and our President.

I guess they might have this story mixed up with the "planted question" to Sec. Rumsfeld back in December 2004.

Yet, that wasn't the case here, Soldiers when asked, will tell you the truth.

Just like in this picture, they tell it like it is!











Michelle Malkin has links to other reactions. Also Blogs for Bush.

UPDATE I: Michelle has a further reponse from one of the soldiers in the video. Here's an excerpt:

"First of all, we were told that we would be speaking with the President of the United States, our Commander-in-Chief, President Bush, so I believe that it would have been totally irresponsible for us NOT to prepare some ideas, facts or comments that we wanted to share …