Skip to main content

"Turd" Liberal Pundits Need to Get a Clue

Slate: Timothy Noah -Turd Blossom Must Go - There is no moral case for keeping Karl Rove on the government payroll.

You've heard of "Moral Relevancy"? Well, with this "leak" deal we now have liberals performing "Journalistic Relevancy" all over the MSM.

For example, Timothy Noah's column over at Slate exhibits the equivalent of "Journalistic Relevancy" while "trying" to squeeze a point for the President to fire Karl Rove. Even though there is NO reason to do so.

Mr. Noah....

"We now know, courtesy of Newsweek's Michael Isikoff, what Karl Rove told Time's Matt Cooper. On July 11, 2003, —three days before a Robert Novak column outed Bush administration critic Joe Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, as a CIA employee —Rove outed Plame to Cooper. Rove did not mention Plame by name, but that hardly matters (except possibly in a narrow legalistic sense, and I have serious doubts even about that). Merely saying that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA was enough to blow Valerie Plame's cover.

It's possible, even likely, that Rove didn't know Plame was undercover. But that distinction is relevant only to the question of whether Patrick Fitzgerald should prosecute Rove under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982, which requires that a covert agent be exposed "intentionally." For a White House official to be so reckless as to reveal, even unknowingly, the identity of an undercover CIA employee is a firing offense. Period. That Rove did so for the purpose of smearing a political enemy makes the whole episode even more distasteful. He's outta there."

Notice the statement of facts: "Rove didn't mention her name" (That's the end of the story). Not withstanding that liberals REFUSE to mention the name "Wilson" with "Proven Liar", instead choosing "Administration Critic"....please!

But......Noah continues...

"but that hardly matters (except possibly in a narrow legalistic sense, and I have serious doubts even about that). Merely saying that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA was enough to blow Valerie Plame's cover." (Really? Well then half of Washington is guilty!)

See the pattern here? "Again, "It's possible, even likely, that Rove didn't know Plame was undercover."

(more likely a fact),

"But that distinction is relevant only to the question of whether Patrick Fitzgerald should prosecute Rove under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982, which requires that a covert agent be exposed "intentionally."

Eh, putz=-bucket, it's pretty well established that she was not a "covert agent"....

"For a White House official to be so reckless as to reveal, even unknowingly, the identity of an undercover CIA employee is a firing offense. Period."

Now he flips! Must be a Democratic trait! Mr. Noah, It's not "CIA employee" under the Intelligence Identities Protection Act. The scope of that law specifically refers to outing a covert agent.

The hairdresser at the CIA and the receptionist don't count.

Can you see the "Well it may be true that..." Followed by the "But that doesn't matter!! Rove sucks, He's gone, it's over!!" mentality here?

Ah...."Don't Confuse me with facts! My mind is made up!"

Turd!....get a clue!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Able Danger - Sign Up - Get the Truth

Per the Able Danger Blog (newly added link), get over to this petition and sign ur name. Again, if there is any chance of true bi-partisan hearings, the people are going to have to speak up and loud.

Just do it!



Newsbusters Busts the MSM on Bush Event

Newsbusters, the blog of Brent Bozell's Media Research Center, exposes the MSM attempt to spin President Bush's meeting with troops into a 'staged event'.

Truth is that the event was not staged, the troops were telling their real feelings: that they support the war and our President.

I guess they might have this story mixed up with the "planted question" to Sec. Rumsfeld back in December 2004.

Yet, that wasn't the case here, Soldiers when asked, will tell you the truth.

Just like in this picture, they tell it like it is!











Michelle Malkin has links to other reactions. Also Blogs for Bush.

UPDATE I: Michelle has a further reponse from one of the soldiers in the video. Here's an excerpt:

"First of all, we were told that we would be speaking with the President of the United States, our Commander-in-Chief, President Bush, so I believe that it would have been totally irresponsible for us NOT to prepare some ideas, facts or comments that we wanted to share …