Skip to main content

We'll NOT Get Bork'ed Again!

Liberals perceive pick as divisive

From all I've read of the reaction of the left on Judge John Roberts nomination the Supremes, the battle-line their forming is around these lines:

1. He's anti-abortion.
2. He thinks Roe V. Wade was a bad decision.
3. See 1.

At least that's the way the "Liberal Bomb-Thrower" Oliver Willis puts it:

"He’s Against Roe v Wade"

"That’s all you need to know about John Roberts Jr., the right-winger Bush has picked for the high court."

heh...cute haircut on that Willis....

Anyway....

Judge Roberts was "shelved" in 1992 because of the same reason. The difference between then and now?

We won the election! Quite frankly you are going to see a real meltdown on the Democratic side over this one. Yeah, it will be a battle, but the truth is that we have the POWER to get this through.

We have the President, the House, the Senate, and the votes. I agree with Mark Noonan over at Blogs for Bush.

"This is our hour of political trial, GOPers...lets not sit back and hope that it'll work out our way...we have to make it happen."

Yes, we've waited a LONG time to have the opportunity to RIGHT this Country and NOW is the time. We WILL make it happen.

The Bolton Nomination stall has been a disgrace and that "gang of 14" a joke. Like in the War on Terror, we need to let our Republican Senators know that either you are ON the President's agenda (with us), or you are against the agenda (against us).

It's time to get busy. We won't get Bork'ed again!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Is the lid about to be blown off Able Danger?

Those who have been wishing for a full blown Able Danger investigation are about to get their wish. The "gate" has been unlocked.

9/11 Iraqi Connection

With Democrats calling for yet more investigations into pre-war intelligence, and Republicans like myself pushing back to help their 'sudden amnesia”, the growing stories of Able Danger and even China Gate, are beginning to make news.

The three main theories about why Able Danger hasn't gotten out of the "blog stage", are 1) To hide Clinton era responsibility for stopping the 9/11 attacks, and/or 2) To hide the truth behind China-Gate, or 3) The facts show that there in fact was a direct link between Iraq and 9/11.

Taking either one you can see why the Clinton worshipping MSM for the most part hasn't touched the story. Of the later point, Democrats, the MSM and even some of our investigations state that there was no 'direct' link between Iraq and 9/11. Say otherwise and the MSM will slice and di…

Able Danger - Pulling Back the Covers of the real Clinton Legacy

First, let's dispense with the bull crap. The meeting between Mohammed Atta and Iraqi Intelligence officer Al-Ani, on April 8th, 2001 happened.

Yet, just don't mention it to the MSM, becaue since May of 2002, the MSM declared an all out assault on the story. A meeting incidently, that the Czech government has to this date stood by.

Let's review a little history:

October 13, 2001: Story of the meeting is leaked from somewhere in the Czech foreign service.

yet.....

October 20, 2001: Ny Times, John Tagliabue writes a story citing other Czech officials said the meeting never took place.

so.....

October 26, 2001: Czech Minister of the Interior, Stanislav Gross has a press conference not only confirming the orginal report but giving further details of Atta's other trip to Prague in June 2000.

then.....

October 27, 2001: The NY Times "recants" the October 20th denial.

The story continues it's oddessy of 'back and forth' until May 1st, 2002, when Walter P…