Skip to main content

Inside Hillary

Inside Hillary's Mind

Tom Blakely of writes a review of Ed Klein's new book, The Truth About Hillary.

Quite frankly I think some of the bloggers on the right, like Powerline, Hugh Hewitt, and others who have been "warning us off" promoting this book are a little "gun-shy". But more important it seems they played into the MSM campaign to quash coverage of the book except to say it "has problems". According to Newsmax where Radio Host Sean Hannity plans to interview Mr. Klein there is incredible pressure to "silence" the contents from being aired.

In addition Rush Limbaugh thinks the press is "circling the wagons" to protect Hillary. Now apparently they are using "right-wing" bloggers (those Dan Rather bashers) to say, "See, the book is bad news!"

For instance, USA Today makes a big deal by quoting some of the "conservative bloggers" to make it's point:

"Some of the influential, conservative "bloggers" who have used their Internet journals to raise questions about the "liberal" media and to spread damaging information about Democratic politicians said they won't endorse The Truth About Hillary."

The nature and sourcing of the accounts raised concerns:

"It seems very similar to the Kitty Kelley book," said Kevin Aylward, who writes the blog Wizbang . Kelley's book The Family: The Real Story of the Bush Dynasty caused controversy with stories about things President Bush had allegedly done when he was a young man.

Aylward's blog was among several that last year led the way in raising questions about a 60 Minutes story concerning Bush's Air National Guard service and in spreading the word about attacks a group known as the Swift Vets and POWs for Truth were making on Sen. John Kerry's military record.

"Even politicians should have some protection from things of this nature," said Paul Mirengoff, co-author of the blog Powerline , which also played a lead role in raising doubts about the 60 Minutes story.

On the Fox News Channel, Bill O'Reilly — another frequent critic of the senator — said Monday that he had read the book and "there's little new" in it. The most negative accounts, he said, come "from anonymous sources, which is not good. Far too many accusations are coming from people who are settling grudges in a cowardly way."

I respect the opinions of others and of the editoral rights of those who choose not to cover something. But a few points:

Edward Klein is a respected writer and not a Kitty Kelley . I don't know how many of these bloggers are professional writers, but I am and "confidential sources" is a mark of the trade. I think most of them are afraid that we'll just make Hillary a "victim" and that will help her in 2008.

It's like, "Be careful, you'll wake the baby!" In Col Sherman Potter's words, "Horse-feathers!"

I think that before anyone jumps the gun they should actually read the book first - (like Bill O'Reilly did ). After all is the point of being objective "fair and balanced". Other's like Mr. Blakely and Former representative John LeBoutillier, R-N.Y who say it is a must read.

Mr. Blakey in his column says: "It was worth my time. This is not a scandal book intended merely to gratify the reader's salacious interests. Instead, Mr. Klein has written a serious political and psychological biography of the most likely next Democratic nominee for president -- and thus, quite plausibly, I fear, the next president of the United States."

That's a good point and comes from one who didn't get all "startled" simply from a Drudge Report headline. I say to everyone, read the book, then judge.

I've ordered mine and plan to cover it's pertainant contents here.

UPDATE: Make sure to read my followup.


Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?


As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Is the lid about to be blown off Able Danger?

Those who have been wishing for a full blown Able Danger investigation are about to get their wish. The "gate" has been unlocked.

9/11 Iraqi Connection

With Democrats calling for yet more investigations into pre-war intelligence, and Republicans like myself pushing back to help their 'sudden amnesia”, the growing stories of Able Danger and even China Gate, are beginning to make news.

The three main theories about why Able Danger hasn't gotten out of the "blog stage", are 1) To hide Clinton era responsibility for stopping the 9/11 attacks, and/or 2) To hide the truth behind China-Gate, or 3) The facts show that there in fact was a direct link between Iraq and 9/11.

Taking either one you can see why the Clinton worshipping MSM for the most part hasn't touched the story. Of the later point, Democrats, the MSM and even some of our investigations state that there was no 'direct' link between Iraq and 9/11. Say otherwise and the MSM will slice and di…

Able Danger - Pulling Back the Covers of the real Clinton Legacy

First, let's dispense with the bull crap. The meeting between Mohammed Atta and Iraqi Intelligence officer Al-Ani, on April 8th, 2001 happened.

Yet, just don't mention it to the MSM, becaue since May of 2002, the MSM declared an all out assault on the story. A meeting incidently, that the Czech government has to this date stood by.

Let's review a little history:

October 13, 2001: Story of the meeting is leaked from somewhere in the Czech foreign service.


October 20, 2001: Ny Times, John Tagliabue writes a story citing other Czech officials said the meeting never took place.


October 26, 2001: Czech Minister of the Interior, Stanislav Gross has a press conference not only confirming the orginal report but giving further details of Atta's other trip to Prague in June 2000.


October 27, 2001: The NY Times "recants" the October 20th denial.

The story continues it's oddessy of 'back and forth' until May 1st, 2002, when Walter P…