Skip to main content

NY Times on Conservative Backlash to "The Truth about Hillary"

Biography of Senator Clinton Has a Few Unexpected Critics

This NY Times article today talks about the “Conservative” backlash against Edward Klein’s book,The Truth about Hillary.

I covered this the other day and mentioned that Rush Limbaugh on his Wednesday radio show called into question the “motives” of conservative bloggers who came out against the book – in line with most of the MSM.

His words:

Transcript: “In addition to that a whole bunch of conservative pundits are out there in a race to see who can be first to impress the mainstream media that they are not right-wing wackos. "I don't abide this book. Hey, don't want me in with Limbaugh and those other guys"….

And later…

“My God, she's at the top of the big leagues in all this! She knows what this is all about. She should be able to defend herself, but she's not even having to. She didn't even have to defend herself. She's got the whole mainstream press apparatus out there circling the wagons around her making sure that she doesn't get touched not even asking her for her comment about it -- and from our side, just my perspective the attacks on this Klein guy from the conservative side, seem way out of proportion to me. Imagine if Gary Aldrich's book came out now. Imagine! I wonder if conservatives would start trashing him?”

In essence Rush wasn’t saying the book was good/bad a piece of trash or anything like that. For myself I’m leafing through it and I don’t see anything I haven’t heard before (or thought). There have been books in the past about Hillary and there will no doubt more as 2008 approaches. Yet, whether people like it or not Inside Hillary will have an impact as Rush agreed:

Transcript: “The contents of book are irrelevant to me at this point and I'm going to tell you what happens, folks: I don't care what the book says. The book is going to make Hillary even bigger. The book is going to turn her into -- the way this culture works she's going to become -- an even bigger celebrity. She's going to become a bigger star out of all of us.

However, the point he did bring up which is important in the new age of blogging. Prior to the 2004 election nobody new what blogging was for the most part. After the election and especially with the Rathergate episode bloggers started to get mainstream media attention (and hits). I learned a long time ago that with fame comes a certain amount of compromise in some cases. Again, the larger point I make now, is as this new medium gets larger and more complex; the oldest rule in journalism still stands:

“To thine own self be true”


Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?


As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Is the lid about to be blown off Able Danger?

Those who have been wishing for a full blown Able Danger investigation are about to get their wish. The "gate" has been unlocked.

9/11 Iraqi Connection

With Democrats calling for yet more investigations into pre-war intelligence, and Republicans like myself pushing back to help their 'sudden amnesia”, the growing stories of Able Danger and even China Gate, are beginning to make news.

The three main theories about why Able Danger hasn't gotten out of the "blog stage", are 1) To hide Clinton era responsibility for stopping the 9/11 attacks, and/or 2) To hide the truth behind China-Gate, or 3) The facts show that there in fact was a direct link between Iraq and 9/11.

Taking either one you can see why the Clinton worshipping MSM for the most part hasn't touched the story. Of the later point, Democrats, the MSM and even some of our investigations state that there was no 'direct' link between Iraq and 9/11. Say otherwise and the MSM will slice and di…

Monday Morning Intelligence with Kool Aid and the NY Times - UPDATE

Followup to previous post.

NY Times: 9/11 Commission's Staff Rejected Report on Early Identification of Chief Hijacker

Ok, I've been on the phone now for...oh, about three days, to some old chums in Tampa, checking this story out, asking questions,...etc. So far what I've heard is that IF this story is true, then those who are really in the know in the Intel world are feeling like a bunch of little red-hair step-childred.

Ed. Morissey is ready to hang the 911 Commission out to dry......mmm,

Ed, not so fast my friend.

Again, I am amazed at the vercacity the NY Times and AP is getting on this story, and from the same conservative bloggers who are normally parsing every "dot and tittle" the Times puts out. Who would think?...

Yeah, there is a lot of "anger" because of "Gorelick" fever where the blogshere and conservative media rightfully called attention to her conflict of interest while serving on the commission. But we can't let the "gotc…