Via Drudge:NY TIMES INVESTIGATES ADOPTION RECORDS OF SUPREME COURT NOMINEE'S CHILDREN

"NY TIMES INVESTIGATES ADOPTION RECORDS OF SUPREME COURT NOMINEE'S CHILDREN

**Exclusive**

The NEW YORK TIMES is looking into the adoption records of the children of Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

The TIMES has investigative reporter Glen Justice hot on the case to investigate the status of adoption records of Judge Roberts’ two young children, Josie age 5 and Jack age 4, a top source reveals.

Judge Roberts and his wife Jane adopted the children when they each were infants.

Both children were adopted from Latin America.

A TIMES insider claims the look into the adoption papers are part of the paper's "standard background check."

Roberts’ young son Jack delighted millions of Americans during his father’s Supreme Court nomination announcement ceremony when he wouldn’t stop dancing while the President and his father spoke to a national television audience.

Previously the WASHINGTON POST Style section had published a story criticizing the outfits Mrs. Roberts had them wear at the announcement ceremony.

One top Washington official with knowledge of the NEW YORK TIMES action declared: “Trying to pry into the lives of the Roberts’ family like this is despicable. Children’s lives should be off limits. The TIMES is putting politics over fundamental decency.”

One top Republican official when told of the situation was incredulous. “This can’t possibly be true?”


Since when did the Judiciary Committee ask the NY Times for "background checks"?, man, the gonads on these clowns!

The "paper of record" goes fishing. For what? Nanny problems? Or could it be that John Roberts is "gasp!" gay, as moonbats at Da Kos are speculating about reference to today's LA Times story on how Judge Roberts worked on Romer V. Evans. More on that case in post to come.

The fact is that the records of the adoption are sealed (standard procedure), that just sets the MSM off! "Can't let that go, let's dig and scratch - I mean the guy is just too damn nice!"

How about reporter Glen Justice, looking into this story? Naw, not a chance, the "paper of record" isn't interested in gathering real news, hasn't been interested in telling the truth in years.

For more on Glen's previous works, read here

0 comments

Support our Vets!



Macsmind - Official Blog of The MacRanger Show on Blog Talk Radio