Skip to main content

Plame Game Update 7 - "Did the CIA offer up Plame as a Sacrifice?"

While Tom Mcguire and others are following all the "who told what to whom, and who in the hell is Judy Miller protecting anyway?" - ins and outs.

Suffice to say that the left has stayed on one determination through the entire story:

"I think the issue is, did Libby tell Miller about a meeting he was at with Dick Cheney - or other members of the White House Iraq Group - at which a plan to discredit Joseph Wilson using his wife's CIA status was hatched? It's seeming more and more likely." (Talk Left)

The entirety of the left's take is that the White House went into damage control to "discredit Wilson" at any cost. This assumes that they even needed a plan to 'discredit wilson', as it turned out down the road it didn't take much. The trip was hardly credible from the get-go.

Be that as it may....

Here are a few thoughts:

Going back to the Newsweek article, Leak Investigation: The Russert Deal—What It Reveals by Michael Isokoff where he wrote this:

"Fitzgerald has been said to be investigating whether any aides violated the 1982 Intelligence Identities Protection Act—which makes it a felony to disclose the identity of a covert CIA employee: it requires showing the violator knew the agent's undercover status. (The State memo makes no reference to that.) But the CIA's initial "crimes report" to the Justice Department requesting the leak probe never mentioned that law, says a former government official who requested anonymity because of the confidential material involved."

Now why is this important. First, the CIA didn't consider Ms. Wilson/Plame covered under the act. This has led Isokoff and other pundits to speculate that Fitzgerald is possibly pursuing perjury or obstruction charges. Besides being wild and speculative, this is likely reaching a conclusion when the premise is off.

If Valerie Plame was not covert and therefore not covered, there is no protection, no need for an investigation, no crime committed - period. True, many grand jury investigations start with one thing and in the end find other crimes were committed. Yeah, Fitzgerald might be able to get purgery or obstruction charges - but good luck. Ten years in Law Enforcement, I've never seen a conviction on "he said, she said" - which no matter what people "wish" to believe, that's all we have right now.

The DU'ers and the Kos's, who want Rove's head, I'm afraid will be vastly disapointed when all is said and done though.

What I hope this who charade leads to is a full blown Senate Investigation. Then we get to see all the "playas" at the CIA - Plame, Tenet and good old Mr. Wilson - but under entirely difference circumstances. Word I've got is that Senator John McCain - who is no fan of the CIA - is itching for this to take place. I hope it happens.

Yet as I've said, and from what I've gathered - and you heard it here first, Fitzgerald is looking at precisely the things I'm talking about on this blog.

But since everyone is speculating, here is some of my own from an entirely different angle.

Let's say that Valerie and some of her co-horts were running a mini-rogue operation right under Tenet's nose. After the war started and all the fake docment, no WMD stuff started swirling, Plame's Game became apparent.

Of course this was the last thing the CIA needed to be known in light of all the scrutiny on botched intelligence.

So Plame's name gets out - by whoever, and now the heads at the agency have to act via Schumer and others demanding an investigation. Yet they can't cite the 1982 Intelligence Identities Protection Act, because it doesn't apply to her. So they instead cite "Security Interests". The fact is that they put her out as a sacrifice of sorts. If the story of her involvement in a scam was going to go fully public, let a investigation reveal that someone down the road when things cooled a little.

Yet the sad fact is that the MSM went "south" on the "leak story", as a decoy to the real story of Plame's Game. That's the sad truth. A rogue officer and her husband conspired to commit treason and yet pulled a "hat trick" by playing the leak card, and the MSM marches in step. (Read (here)

In fact, read here about a good theory about how Mr. Wilson himself started the ball and keeps it rolling.

I just got off the phone with some friends in VA, you know, shooting the bull, asking how things are going. I'll tell you this, if you think that there aren't people who are there who are ready to "Name that Plame Game", you're wrong.

Not every person in the CIA is rogue or playing politics. There are some good people there and many are in fact royally pissed at what they call the "moonlighers", or those who leak information in order to determine political policy. In fact, even today we read of yet another leak from INSIDE the agency about Iran's nuclear capability. I could remind you that Classified information being leaked is a crime, but as expected the media jumps on the report instead of the question of "who leaked it?".

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Is the lid about to be blown off Able Danger?

Those who have been wishing for a full blown Able Danger investigation are about to get their wish. The "gate" has been unlocked.

9/11 Iraqi Connection

With Democrats calling for yet more investigations into pre-war intelligence, and Republicans like myself pushing back to help their 'sudden amnesia”, the growing stories of Able Danger and even China Gate, are beginning to make news.

The three main theories about why Able Danger hasn't gotten out of the "blog stage", are 1) To hide Clinton era responsibility for stopping the 9/11 attacks, and/or 2) To hide the truth behind China-Gate, or 3) The facts show that there in fact was a direct link between Iraq and 9/11.

Taking either one you can see why the Clinton worshipping MSM for the most part hasn't touched the story. Of the later point, Democrats, the MSM and even some of our investigations state that there was no 'direct' link between Iraq and 9/11. Say otherwise and the MSM will slice and di…

Able Danger - Pulling Back the Covers of the real Clinton Legacy

First, let's dispense with the bull crap. The meeting between Mohammed Atta and Iraqi Intelligence officer Al-Ani, on April 8th, 2001 happened.

Yet, just don't mention it to the MSM, becaue since May of 2002, the MSM declared an all out assault on the story. A meeting incidently, that the Czech government has to this date stood by.

Let's review a little history:

October 13, 2001: Story of the meeting is leaked from somewhere in the Czech foreign service.

yet.....

October 20, 2001: Ny Times, John Tagliabue writes a story citing other Czech officials said the meeting never took place.

so.....

October 26, 2001: Czech Minister of the Interior, Stanislav Gross has a press conference not only confirming the orginal report but giving further details of Atta's other trip to Prague in June 2000.

then.....

October 27, 2001: The NY Times "recants" the October 20th denial.

The story continues it's oddessy of 'back and forth' until May 1st, 2002, when Walter P…