Skip to main content

Nukes Cannot Stand in Iran

Back in my child rearing days I had a code that I lived by. If a child should draw a line in the sand and dare you to cross it, "Thou shalt not be disappointed".

Iran is acting like a child - a wild and dangerous child at that".

"Iran is to build a second nuclear reactor to match the plant currently under construction in the coastal city of Bushehr, state television reported today.

The decision came after a meeting of the country's cabinet and president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad last night.

The reactor has been on the drawing board since the 1970s and comes as part of government plans to build up to 20 nuclear plants with Russian help.

But concerns over Iran's intentions on nuclear weapons mean that the announcement will inevitably be viewed as a provocation."


Provocation is exactly what it is, and at least one country may not simply stand by and let Iran become a Nuclear power. That Country is Israel, where Former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu supports preemptive strikes:

"Israeli leaders have repeatedly identified Iran as the biggest threat to Israel and dismissed Tehran's claim that its nuclear program is solely for peaceful purposes.

Although Netanyahu is considered a long shot for the prime minister's post, his remarks threatened to escalate growing tensions with Iran and signaled that the Iranian nuclear program will be an important campaign issue in the elections March 28.

Netanyahu said Israel should follow the example of Menachem Begin, who as prime minister ordered an airstrike on an unfinished Iraqi nuclear reactor at Osirak in 1981.

"I will continue the tradition established by Menachem Begin, who did not allow Iraq to develop such a nuclear threat against Israel, and by a daring and courageous act gave us two decades of tranquillity," Netanyahu told the daily newspaper Maariv. "I believe that this is what Israel has to do."

Netanyahu said the Iranian program "is a genuine threat to the very existence of Israel," adding, "Iran cannot be allowed to develop a nuclear threat against Israel"

He said he would support Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, a bitter political enemy, if he were to carry out a pre-emptive strike."


Israel exerted itself against Iran in 1981 when Menachem Begin,ordered an airstrike on an unfinished Iraqi nuclear reactor at Osirak in 1981.

Iran simply cannot be allowed to build a Nuclear program, whether for peaceful or other purposes so long as they continue to have the view of annaliation they have towards Israel and the West.

If Iran is allowed to succeed, it could lead to a regional arms race, perhaps involving Saudi Arabia, Egypt, or Syria. As one expert, Joseph Cirincione at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, says, "There is a high probability there would be a nuclear chain reaction that would ripple through the region."


More at AJ Strata

UPDATE: This story is citing 'experts' opinion that Isreal could not strike Iranian nuclear targets;

" In an article authored by Shlomo Brom, former head of air force strategic planning, the report said Israel's deep-strike air capability was based on the F-15I and F-16C/D aircraft. At a range of more than 600 kilometers, Brom said, Israel could not sustain an air campaign. Iran is about 1,000 kilometers from Israel."

But according this, the cards have been on the table for a while:

"Heightening speculation, Israel will make a point of bombing Iran's nuclear facilities is news that the Pentagon is planning to sell the Sharon Government 100 bunker-buster bombs. These two-tonne bombs can burrow as deep as 30 metres below ground and through a six-metre thick concrete wall.

Retired Israeli Air Force Colonel, Ziev Raz says the time for action against Tehran and its nuclear program is fast approaching."

The logistical problems cited for an Israeli attack are null if support is provided via military sites in Iraq (quite possibly Al Iskandariyah airfield). While the UN and other groups would cry foul, the US would simply have to say that it was being a good ally - but neighboring countries would secretly support such actions for albeit other reasons than Israel.

Mark this blog, if Iran crosses the line, Israel will not disappoint.







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Able Danger - Sign Up - Get the Truth

Per the Able Danger Blog (newly added link), get over to this petition and sign ur name. Again, if there is any chance of true bi-partisan hearings, the people are going to have to speak up and loud.

Just do it!



Newsbusters Busts the MSM on Bush Event

Newsbusters, the blog of Brent Bozell's Media Research Center, exposes the MSM attempt to spin President Bush's meeting with troops into a 'staged event'.

Truth is that the event was not staged, the troops were telling their real feelings: that they support the war and our President.

I guess they might have this story mixed up with the "planted question" to Sec. Rumsfeld back in December 2004.

Yet, that wasn't the case here, Soldiers when asked, will tell you the truth.

Just like in this picture, they tell it like it is!











Michelle Malkin has links to other reactions. Also Blogs for Bush.

UPDATE I: Michelle has a further reponse from one of the soldiers in the video. Here's an excerpt:

"First of all, we were told that we would be speaking with the President of the United States, our Commander-in-Chief, President Bush, so I believe that it would have been totally irresponsible for us NOT to prepare some ideas, facts or comments that we wanted to share …