Skip to main content

Motive and Opportunity - The Alito Set Up

One wonders why a supposed dead story at The NY Times get resurgence just before the Christmas break, or more to reality, just a month before the Alito Confirmation hearings.

Alito defended government wiretap rights

"WASHINGTON - Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito defended the right of government officials to order domestic wiretaps when he worked for the Reagan Justice Department, documents released Friday show.

He advocated a step-by-step approach to strengthening the hand of officials in a 1984 memo to the solicitor general. The strategy is similar to the one that Alito espoused for rolling back abortion rights at the margins.

The release of the memo by the National Archives comes when President Bush is under fire for secretly ordering domestic spying of suspected terrorists without a warrant. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter, R-Pa., has promised to question Alito about the administration’s program.


Again, "Spector", but it's not "the administration's program" It's the same program that has been the practice of Presidents (especially Clinton) for nearly 40 years. But I digress.

Truth is that I not buying the simple "coincidence" here.

The documents might have been released today, but their contents were known as early as last month by certain senatorial staffers who had 'indications' of their content, thus they specifically asked for their release, this according to sources I've spoken with today.

The question now is whether or not if the leak to the NY times has been nothing more than an orchestrated torpedo to sink Alito's nomination next year.

Stay tuned....

UPDATE: Poweline slams AP; Michelle Malkin with more links.

Note, as I said here, there is no doubt in my mind that the AP or other MSM outlets are able to read and know that the actual memo says nothing of the kind regarding warrantless wiretaps, but that's not the issue as far as they are concerned. Remember? In 'agenda driven journalism", it's get the story out - even if it's false, because they know and it's true that people remember the first headline, not the resultant explanations or corrections.

Mission accomplished eh AP?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Able Danger - Sign Up - Get the Truth

Per the Able Danger Blog (newly added link), get over to this petition and sign ur name. Again, if there is any chance of true bi-partisan hearings, the people are going to have to speak up and loud.

Just do it!



Newsbusters Busts the MSM on Bush Event

Newsbusters, the blog of Brent Bozell's Media Research Center, exposes the MSM attempt to spin President Bush's meeting with troops into a 'staged event'.

Truth is that the event was not staged, the troops were telling their real feelings: that they support the war and our President.

I guess they might have this story mixed up with the "planted question" to Sec. Rumsfeld back in December 2004.

Yet, that wasn't the case here, Soldiers when asked, will tell you the truth.

Just like in this picture, they tell it like it is!











Michelle Malkin has links to other reactions. Also Blogs for Bush.

UPDATE I: Michelle has a further reponse from one of the soldiers in the video. Here's an excerpt:

"First of all, we were told that we would be speaking with the President of the United States, our Commander-in-Chief, President Bush, so I believe that it would have been totally irresponsible for us NOT to prepare some ideas, facts or comments that we wanted to share …