Skip to main content

Slip of the VIPS Sinks Ships

Before Nicolas Kistoff's May 6th, 2003 article on Joe Wilson's "tea party" with the "gang" in Niger, Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) were already beginning to run 'interference' and had been involved in what could be described as a "jilted lover" campaign with the White House, publishing letter after letter mostly on the progressive website, Commondreams, since 2002. In fact, when you read these letters and memos and Kristoff's piece it's almost as if the "two were one."

Most of these letters of the same subject, "i.e: No WMD, no case for war, and assorted and sometimes hysterical conspiracy theories. For those who don't know VIPS is made up of ex members of the intel community, primarily Raymond McGovern, David MacMichael, Col. Pat Lang, Patrick G. Eddington, and others familiar to us who worked during the Reagan years. Suffice to say these guys and gals are the reason for the tag, "Rogue CIA", which is to me no suprise that they may find themselves up to their their butts in the Plame Game when all is said and done.

In fact, one such Memorandum for the President they posted right on July 14th, 2003, which you will know is the day of Bob Novak's article. You know, and I have it on good ground that the man who approached Bob Novak on Pennsyvania Avenue (referenced in Wilson's Book), was in fact Ex-op Larry C. Johnson, another member of VIPS whom Wilson sent to "bait" Novak.

But back to the memo. In the second paragraph of a diatribe called, "Intelligence Unglued", is this interesting quip or perhaps 'slip':

"It is now dawning on our until-now somnolent press that your national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, shepherds the foreign affairs sections of your state-of-the-union address and that she, not Tenet, is responsible for the forged information getting into the speech. But the disingenuousness persists. Surely Dr. Rice cannot persist in her insistence that she learned only on June 8, 2003 about former ambassador Joseph Wilson’s mission to Niger in February 2002, when he determined that the Iraq-Niger report was a con-job. Wilson’s findings were duly reported to all concerned in early March 2002. And, if she somehow missed that report, the New York Times’ Nicholas Kristoff on May 6 recounted chapter and verse on Wilson’s mission, and the story remained the talk of the town in the weeks that followed."

Opps...."talk of the town in the weeks that followed Wilson's 'tea party'" You mean talk of the Washington establishment? Like Cliff May said, "Who didn't know?"

Which makes me wonder, who was helping Joe to "shop around his story"?

Filed under:


Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?


As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Able Danger - Sign Up - Get the Truth

Per the Able Danger Blog (newly added link), get over to this petition and sign ur name. Again, if there is any chance of true bi-partisan hearings, the people are going to have to speak up and loud.

Just do it!

Newsbusters Busts the MSM on Bush Event

Newsbusters, the blog of Brent Bozell's Media Research Center, exposes the MSM attempt to spin President Bush's meeting with troops into a 'staged event'.

Truth is that the event was not staged, the troops were telling their real feelings: that they support the war and our President.

I guess they might have this story mixed up with the "planted question" to Sec. Rumsfeld back in December 2004.

Yet, that wasn't the case here, Soldiers when asked, will tell you the truth.

Just like in this picture, they tell it like it is!

Michelle Malkin has links to other reactions. Also Blogs for Bush.

UPDATE I: Michelle has a further reponse from one of the soldiers in the video. Here's an excerpt:

"First of all, we were told that we would be speaking with the President of the United States, our Commander-in-Chief, President Bush, so I believe that it would have been totally irresponsible for us NOT to prepare some ideas, facts or comments that we wanted to share …