Skip to main content

Plame Game - VIPS Ray McGovern and the Niger Lie

Since I'm constantly referencing the group of has been ops reponsible for the Plame Game, I though it would be a good time to review some of what they stand for. The first, and most visible is Ray McGovern. As I noted before, this article gives you the background on Mr. McGovern.

However, since we are on the Niger forgeries, take a look at this interview with "Truthout", Ray gave in June of 2003.:

" My primary attention is on the forgery of the Niger documents that supposedly proved Iraq was developing a nuclear program. It seems to me that you can have endless arguments about the correct interpretation of this or that piece of intelligence, or intelligence analysis, but a forgery is a forgery. It’s demonstrable that senior officials of this government, including the Vice President, knew that it was a forgery in March of last year. It was used anyway to deceive our Congressmen and Senators into voting for an unprovoked war. That seems to me to be something that needs to be borne in mind, that needs to be held up for everyone to see. If an informed public, and by extension an informed Congress, is the necessary bedrock for democracy, then we’ve got a split bedrock that is in bad need of repair."

The date of this interview is June 26th, 2003. The reference to Cheney knowing about the Niger forgeries "last year" is patently false but a reoccuring theme that the left uses even today.

Of course the reference is to Wilson's 2002 trip. On that trip, Wilson didn't see any documents, nor did he brief anyone he had seen them, and the SSCI bore this out:

"(U) The former ambassador also told Committee staff that he was the source of a Washington Post article ("CIA Did Not Share Doubt on Iraq Data; Bush Used Report of Uranium Bid," June 12,2003) which said, "among the Envoy's conclusions was that the documents may have been forged because 'the dates were wrong and the names were wrong."' Committee staff asked how the former ambassador could have come to the conclusion that the "dates were wrong and the names were wrong" when he had never seen the CIA reports and had no knowledge of what names and dates were in the reports. The former ambassador said that he may have "misspoken" to the reporter when he said he concluded the documents were "forged." He also said he may have become confused about his own recollection after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported in March 2003 that the names and dates on the documents were not correct and may have thought he had seen the names himself. The former ambassador reiterated that he had been able to collect the names of the government officials which should have been on the documents." (SSCI Page 55).

Even though there was no way in heck that Wilson saw these documents UNLESS he had been shown them by someone who would not want that information known, somehow the VP of the United States knew they were forgeries, even though it would be eight months before the IAEA would mysteriously discover (with timing reminiseant of the October 2004 IAEA Al Qaqaa story) that the documents were fakes. Truth is that Wilson being the liar he is simply doens't know when to shut up. He slipped up and hasn't been able to recover ever since. But it hasn't stopped the VIPS nor their audience in the antiwar left.

This is because "Wilson exposed the forgery" is key to the antiwar left's "Bush lied" argument.

And because it's key, while was basically killed off in 2004, it has nonetheless been revived in light of the Fitzmas fizzle. It's a kind of insanity that one would attempt to revive a lie thinking no one was paying attention the first time around.

Fat chance!

Dress it up any way you want, It's the same old tired "Bush used forged documents to get us into war" lie, which I explained in this previous post is simply not true.

The documents were not even considered in the overall analysis and in fact Bush referrenced not them but British intel which was far more reaching and intelligence by which they still stand by.

It's time for the Bush administration to take the offensive and expose the lies that have to long been allowed to grow into "legend". It's time to rumble and by God, this old war horse is ready.

UPDATE: First, the new issue of National Review is up (digital subscription needed), and Africa Joe is the cover boy.

Two quick updates: 1. Reference to Cheney and the Niger Docs, I forgot to mention the fact that the Vice President was never briefed on Joe's trip (so even if Joe knew about the forged documents it never go to where it was supposed to go). Instead the CIA/DO report draft on Wilson's trip was sent via basic distribution. Not exactly what you do when the VP of the United States asked for information. Secondly, (h/t commentor BurbankErnie) Michael Leeden has this excellent bitch slap on Wilson, and a clarification on the true source of the Niger docs here - excellent!








Filed under:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Is the lid about to be blown off Able Danger?

Those who have been wishing for a full blown Able Danger investigation are about to get their wish. The "gate" has been unlocked.

9/11 Iraqi Connection

With Democrats calling for yet more investigations into pre-war intelligence, and Republicans like myself pushing back to help their 'sudden amnesia”, the growing stories of Able Danger and even China Gate, are beginning to make news.

The three main theories about why Able Danger hasn't gotten out of the "blog stage", are 1) To hide Clinton era responsibility for stopping the 9/11 attacks, and/or 2) To hide the truth behind China-Gate, or 3) The facts show that there in fact was a direct link between Iraq and 9/11.

Taking either one you can see why the Clinton worshipping MSM for the most part hasn't touched the story. Of the later point, Democrats, the MSM and even some of our investigations state that there was no 'direct' link between Iraq and 9/11. Say otherwise and the MSM will slice and di…

Able Danger - Pulling Back the Covers of the real Clinton Legacy

First, let's dispense with the bull crap. The meeting between Mohammed Atta and Iraqi Intelligence officer Al-Ani, on April 8th, 2001 happened.

Yet, just don't mention it to the MSM, becaue since May of 2002, the MSM declared an all out assault on the story. A meeting incidently, that the Czech government has to this date stood by.

Let's review a little history:

October 13, 2001: Story of the meeting is leaked from somewhere in the Czech foreign service.

yet.....

October 20, 2001: Ny Times, John Tagliabue writes a story citing other Czech officials said the meeting never took place.

so.....

October 26, 2001: Czech Minister of the Interior, Stanislav Gross has a press conference not only confirming the orginal report but giving further details of Atta's other trip to Prague in June 2000.

then.....

October 27, 2001: The NY Times "recants" the October 20th denial.

The story continues it's oddessy of 'back and forth' until May 1st, 2002, when Walter P…