Skip to main content

Plame Game - Yellow Wedding Cake

One of the most facinating facts of the Plame Game is the curious involvement of the principal subject, Valerie Plame.

It's no secret that Mr. Wilson went to great effort to "hide the fact" that his wife "specifically recommended him for the trip". Detractors, of this fact cited in the SSCI, are quick to try to say that "She was a low level employee and she just 'offered up his name'", which again, we know to be false.

However, more important, Valerie had 'offered up his name in the past as well, in 1999 on another mission for "Uranium Related Matters", Additionally, if she was such a low level employee, then how did her "low level" suggestion get through? Again, who sends a washed up, has been, Bush bashing,ex-ambassador with 'baggage' on a "fact finding mission"?

So the question to ask is "why"? Why was it so important for Wilson to deny this fact? Even more direct, other than the 'offering up" of Joe's name, what other part did Valerie possibly play?

Recently we have heard that French company COGEMA has been cited in the Oil for Food Scandal. You who have been following along might remember COGEMA is in many minds suspected of being a "yellow cake" middle man for sales to Iraq.

The question is though, as a company of this visibility and size, they wouldn't have dealt directly without so type of "cover". So the question would be "'who" helped broker the deals between Niger and Iraq, and do it in such a way that it would never be discovered? Who would have access and influence and power to ensure that such transactions went "undected"?

Who indeed.

Brewster-Jennings and Associates

What better 'middleman" than a company formed to track human intelligence on black market transfers of weapons of mass destruction, particularly nuclear materials? It's like crooked NARCS stealing the dope. Except in this case this operation was so amatureist, and easily discoverable that one can wonder how low level the operation was. Yet another question would be, "Who would ulimately fund the operation"?, and who knew about it?

A clue may be a possible reason why DUN, where BJA was registered in 1994, refused to release the filing source.

But as influencial and 'in place" as they were, BJA would need help. Enter 1998 and JC Wilson International. Incidently, this is the year that Valerie and Joe marry, having met "through business contacts" in 1997. Still, to gain total access, more would be needed.

One of the “proofs” offered by critics that Iraq was unable to buy YC, was that France controlled uranium through COGEMA, a subsidiary of French owned, AREVA. This of course is laughable on it’s face (as in the fox guarding the hen house), as the results from Oil for Food Scandal investigation have so far revealed.

Yet in making the exact connections between all the playas, the net becomes even wider.

The 623-page Volcker report suggests more than half of the companies (about 2200) that participated in oil-for-food helped Saddam undermine international sanctions on Iraq by supplying the regime with a ready source of income. Again, money corrupts, and while it is being found that countries like France, Germany and Russia 'paid the piper in orderto be paid BY the piper", and buying cover for illicit covert activities, we will soon find out that a lot of this money was funneling through the very core of our political system during the 2004 election.

In fact, the infamous IAEA comes to mind and makes more understandable it's suspected meddling to possibly influence the outcome of the 2004 election. One doubts whether the Oil for Food investigation would have preceeded as far as it has in a John Kerry administration.






















Filed under:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Is the lid about to be blown off Able Danger?

Those who have been wishing for a full blown Able Danger investigation are about to get their wish. The "gate" has been unlocked.

9/11 Iraqi Connection

With Democrats calling for yet more investigations into pre-war intelligence, and Republicans like myself pushing back to help their 'sudden amnesia”, the growing stories of Able Danger and even China Gate, are beginning to make news.

The three main theories about why Able Danger hasn't gotten out of the "blog stage", are 1) To hide Clinton era responsibility for stopping the 9/11 attacks, and/or 2) To hide the truth behind China-Gate, or 3) The facts show that there in fact was a direct link between Iraq and 9/11.

Taking either one you can see why the Clinton worshipping MSM for the most part hasn't touched the story. Of the later point, Democrats, the MSM and even some of our investigations state that there was no 'direct' link between Iraq and 9/11. Say otherwise and the MSM will slice and di…

Able Danger - Pulling Back the Covers of the real Clinton Legacy

First, let's dispense with the bull crap. The meeting between Mohammed Atta and Iraqi Intelligence officer Al-Ani, on April 8th, 2001 happened.

Yet, just don't mention it to the MSM, becaue since May of 2002, the MSM declared an all out assault on the story. A meeting incidently, that the Czech government has to this date stood by.

Let's review a little history:

October 13, 2001: Story of the meeting is leaked from somewhere in the Czech foreign service.

yet.....

October 20, 2001: Ny Times, John Tagliabue writes a story citing other Czech officials said the meeting never took place.

so.....

October 26, 2001: Czech Minister of the Interior, Stanislav Gross has a press conference not only confirming the orginal report but giving further details of Atta's other trip to Prague in June 2000.

then.....

October 27, 2001: The NY Times "recants" the October 20th denial.

The story continues it's oddessy of 'back and forth' until May 1st, 2002, when Walter P…