Skip to main content

Don't Believe the "Glenn Beck is Losing Sponsors" Garbage

Color of Change, the socialist gadfly founded by Van Jones is crowing about how many sponsors have left the Glenn Beck show.
"Our campaign to hold Glenn Beck accountable for his race-baiting and fear-mongering has been a great success, with 62 advertisers making it clear that they don't want their brands linked to Beck's vile rhetoric. Up until now, however, there's been a question of what the real consequences are for Beck and for Fox, especially as Beck's ratings have soared. It's starting to become clear. Today, we're announcing that Glenn Beck's show has lost over 50% of its advertising dollars since just before our campaign started."
Which is simply not so. Speaking with two Fox News Producers familiar, Beck's show is "sponsor proof" in that the revenue to run it - and pay Beck - comes from sources outside of ads.

 It's a well known flak jacket against these types of "boycotts" where you take from Peter to Pay Paul.

James Rucker tries to throw up some bogus data to prove COC's boycott is working, but he's talking nonsense. Quite frankly the ad sponsors COC (nice nomen) speaks about are far more savvy than than that. Of course they want viewers because viewers equal $$$$. So let's say that American Express says "Ok, we won't show ads during his show".

 No problem. You just jack their ad price across other shows where they do show ads.  In fact Beck's ratings have so enhanced Fox's overall viewership that their rate cards have nearly doubled for all other shows.

Which is why shows, like Beck's,  which pull most viewers Cable News Shows especially are pretty much immune to boycotts because much of their cost is absorbed by CATV revenues outside of ad revenue.

Thus the Glenn Beck show could very well run commercial free and it wouldn't harm the show, the ratings or Fox's bottom line.

By the way, I got an affirmative response from the IRS about my written query into COC operations, specifically how they deal with their donations, which means that they may be looking into how and where they are funneling their money.

Get ready for that to break over the next couple of weeks.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Able Danger - Sign Up - Get the Truth

Per the Able Danger Blog (newly added link), get over to this petition and sign ur name. Again, if there is any chance of true bi-partisan hearings, the people are going to have to speak up and loud.

Just do it!



Newsbusters Busts the MSM on Bush Event

Newsbusters, the blog of Brent Bozell's Media Research Center, exposes the MSM attempt to spin President Bush's meeting with troops into a 'staged event'.

Truth is that the event was not staged, the troops were telling their real feelings: that they support the war and our President.

I guess they might have this story mixed up with the "planted question" to Sec. Rumsfeld back in December 2004.

Yet, that wasn't the case here, Soldiers when asked, will tell you the truth.

Just like in this picture, they tell it like it is!











Michelle Malkin has links to other reactions. Also Blogs for Bush.

UPDATE I: Michelle has a further reponse from one of the soldiers in the video. Here's an excerpt:

"First of all, we were told that we would be speaking with the President of the United States, our Commander-in-Chief, President Bush, so I believe that it would have been totally irresponsible for us NOT to prepare some ideas, facts or comments that we wanted to share …