Skip to main content

Trouble at Polipundit

Here is what happens when you take your blogging too damn seriously. Some hypocrisy here when over the last few years one creams the WAPO and the NY Times for totalitarian editors and then when you get a few hits on the ole blogometer you become one yourself.

Here's your Hiel Poli!

Polipundit has been a fave of mine for a while, but the main blogger "Poli" has been having a meltdown - build a wall - shoot the mexicans - as have others of the "out of mainstream" far - build a wall - shoot the mexicans - Right over this immigration issue have been.

But when you have a group blog and you essentially fire your 'staff' because they make you look foolish (which from what I read of Poli's recent statements is a fair assessment).

Fact is that these are the kind of people in our party that will have us all saluting Hillary in January 2007. These "my way or the highway", "can't see the forest for my getting my point to be everyone else's point" stuck in the mud "conservative impersonators".

You know a leadership principle that has never failed is that "You are only as good as your people". Another, "When you're green you grow, when you're ripe, it' not long before you get rotten".

Polipundit has a stink about it. The same that is whiffing out from Michelle Malkin, National Review and other "build a wall - shoot the Mexicans" people.

Meanwhile one of the most prolific writers - and quite frankly the reason it's readership soared - the one and only Lori Byrd has her own blog, Byrd Droppings, and it will be my newest link. Be sure to check her out.

As for Poli - sign off dude, take us a vacation.

UPDATE: Per BP in comments:

Mac, love your work but do not smear Michelle Malkin or the rest of us at Hot Air as "shoot the Mexicans" kind of people. That's beneath you. Show one post on her site or Hot Air, or any evidence at all, that she or we have advocated anything like that. It's rhetoric such as yours that really is causing a schism in the GOP.

Build a wall? You betcha. The porous border is a major national security hole that needs to be patched. Enforce the law? Again, youbetcha. Stop the inflow of illegals? Yup. But not by "shooting the Mexicans." By...building a wall/fence and enforcing the law.

Why is this so hard for so many otherwise intelligent people to understand? And why do so many--like you--resort to smears so quickly? As I said, it's beneath you and does no one any good."


Read my response in the comments. Basically, my take and being voiced with a lot of conservative people I talked to today we have some spoiled brats in the party and they are in the minority, and getting rather annoying. The fact is that the overwhelming amount of emails I have received today (about 400), have been in agreement that the President has at least begun something to fix the situation - which is more than anyone else has done in the last 30 years.

Again, MM and others like her are in the minority. Like I said in the comments, "If the shoe fits". Sorry, but the attitude I see, clothed in "concern over borders", stinks of exclusionist philosophy, and yes of racism. Most of it is directly derogatory language towards hispanics (El-Presidente, etc), and quite frankly I find unacceptable - thus the "shoot mexicans" lable stands.

This problem is over 50 years in the making, but it's not going to get fixed by hiding in our closets with shotguns fearful of the "hoard".

Nuff said.

UPDATE: Per CNN - "79 percent of those who watched had a very favorable or favorable view of the speech, and those who support the president's policies rose in number from 42 to 67 percent".

Dick Morris called it a "Great Speech".

It's a plan people, let's see how it gets worked out.

UPDATE: For background on where some of Bush's opponents are coming from read Harold C. Hutchison's post at his blog Called as Seen Blogspot.

UPDATE: You know that when Polipundit begins supporting Ben Nelson (D-NE) for reelection, it proves my point. Standing on principals is one thing. Taking your ball and going home because you didn't win is an entirely different thing.

Yep - full fledged BDS (Border Derangement Syndrome) going on his folks.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Is the lid about to be blown off Able Danger?

Those who have been wishing for a full blown Able Danger investigation are about to get their wish. The "gate" has been unlocked.

9/11 Iraqi Connection

With Democrats calling for yet more investigations into pre-war intelligence, and Republicans like myself pushing back to help their 'sudden amnesia”, the growing stories of Able Danger and even China Gate, are beginning to make news.

The three main theories about why Able Danger hasn't gotten out of the "blog stage", are 1) To hide Clinton era responsibility for stopping the 9/11 attacks, and/or 2) To hide the truth behind China-Gate, or 3) The facts show that there in fact was a direct link between Iraq and 9/11.

Taking either one you can see why the Clinton worshipping MSM for the most part hasn't touched the story. Of the later point, Democrats, the MSM and even some of our investigations state that there was no 'direct' link between Iraq and 9/11. Say otherwise and the MSM will slice and di…

Able Danger - Pulling Back the Covers of the real Clinton Legacy

First, let's dispense with the bull crap. The meeting between Mohammed Atta and Iraqi Intelligence officer Al-Ani, on April 8th, 2001 happened.

Yet, just don't mention it to the MSM, becaue since May of 2002, the MSM declared an all out assault on the story. A meeting incidently, that the Czech government has to this date stood by.

Let's review a little history:

October 13, 2001: Story of the meeting is leaked from somewhere in the Czech foreign service.

yet.....

October 20, 2001: Ny Times, John Tagliabue writes a story citing other Czech officials said the meeting never took place.

so.....

October 26, 2001: Czech Minister of the Interior, Stanislav Gross has a press conference not only confirming the orginal report but giving further details of Atta's other trip to Prague in June 2000.

then.....

October 27, 2001: The NY Times "recants" the October 20th denial.

The story continues it's oddessy of 'back and forth' until May 1st, 2002, when Walter P…