Skip to main content

No, Bob Barr with the ACLU - Lives in a Fantasy World

Former Representitive and closet Bush hater Bob Barr continues his onslaught on the NSA surveillance program:

"(CNSNews.com) - A bill to clarify the Bush administration's lawful use of domestic spying would give the administration a "blank check," according to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and former Republican U.S. Rep. Bob Barr. The bill, sponsored by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter was ridiculed by Barr Tuesday as the product of a "bizarro world."

The National Security Surveillance Act of 2006 was introduced in March. Specter has called it a "compromise" bill that would allow the president flexible use of electronic surveillance while giving him the option of seeking prior approval for the surveillance from the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court.

"I think it's clear that compromise is a complete mischaracterization of what is contained in the Specter bill," said Caroline Fredrickson, director of the ACLU's legislative office in Washington, D.C.

"In fact it is basically a capitulation to the administration and all of the wish lists of what they would want," Frederickson said during a conference call with reporters.

"What this means -- bottom line -- is that the president can unilaterally monitor anyone he wants, at anytime, for any duration without any check whatsoever," said Lisa Graves, senior counsel for legislative strategy at the ACLU.

Graves said the Specter bill falls far short of providing a congressional check on the president. "There are a lot of problems with this bill, but all those problems are overshadowed by the fact that the president, in this bill, is not required to follow anything in it," she said.

"It is really a blank check, or at the minimum, a check for whatever the president wants."

Barr, who represented Georgia's 7th District in the U.S. House from 1995 until 2003, added that the bill would allow the president to go on a "broad net fishing expedition" for data.

"This legislation, while labeled by Senator Specter as a compromise, is a complete cave-in to the administration," Barr complained. "It's almost as if this were being proposed in an alternative universe, sort of a bizarro world."

The bill does stipulate that the president should have significant authority over electronic surveillance. "The Commander in Chief requires the ability and means to detect and track an enemy that can master and exploit modern technology," Specter's bill states.

It adds, however, that while "it is essential that the President have all necessary means to protect us against our enemies, it is equally essential that, in doing so, the President does not compromise the very civil liberties that the President seeks to safeguard."


When Spector announced the compromise, some conservatives had a "WTF" moment, but I told you, "I see a smirk". The fact that both the ACLU and Bob Barr are bugged just confirms my original diagnosis. Notice that all of the ACLU and Barr's objections are "hypothetical" and quite frankly insulting to the character of President Bush.

Again, for the hand-wringing going on, no one has yet to come forward and say, "I've been harmed!" by the very effective NSA program. The fact is the program works, safegards are in place, and the socialist ACLU and Bob Barr should take a powder and get over it.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Is the lid about to be blown off Able Danger?

Those who have been wishing for a full blown Able Danger investigation are about to get their wish. The "gate" has been unlocked.

9/11 Iraqi Connection

With Democrats calling for yet more investigations into pre-war intelligence, and Republicans like myself pushing back to help their 'sudden amnesia”, the growing stories of Able Danger and even China Gate, are beginning to make news.

The three main theories about why Able Danger hasn't gotten out of the "blog stage", are 1) To hide Clinton era responsibility for stopping the 9/11 attacks, and/or 2) To hide the truth behind China-Gate, or 3) The facts show that there in fact was a direct link between Iraq and 9/11.

Taking either one you can see why the Clinton worshipping MSM for the most part hasn't touched the story. Of the later point, Democrats, the MSM and even some of our investigations state that there was no 'direct' link between Iraq and 9/11. Say otherwise and the MSM will slice and di…

Monday Morning Intelligence with Kool Aid and the NY Times - UPDATE

Followup to previous post.

NY Times: 9/11 Commission's Staff Rejected Report on Early Identification of Chief Hijacker

Ok, I've been on the phone now for...oh, about three days, to some old chums in Tampa, checking this story out, asking questions,...etc. So far what I've heard is that IF this story is true, then those who are really in the know in the Intel world are feeling like a bunch of little red-hair step-childred.

Ed. Morissey is ready to hang the 911 Commission out to dry......mmm,

Ed, not so fast my friend.

Again, I am amazed at the vercacity the NY Times and AP is getting on this story, and from the same conservative bloggers who are normally parsing every "dot and tittle" the Times puts out. Who would think?...

Yeah, there is a lot of "anger" because of "Gorelick" fever where the blogshere and conservative media rightfully called attention to her conflict of interest while serving on the commission. But we can't let the "gotc…