Skip to main content

Plame Game - Rounding the Curve

Been getting a lot of emails on this story by the "usual suspects" at the Ny Times. It surrounds a hitherto classified letter by Rep. Pete Hoekstra to President Bush. Of course was leaked to the Times(they are sure making the proscutor's job easier).

However, in the letter Hoekstra pulls no punches about what was at the heart of the Plame Game all along. He addresses those suspicions in the letter where he tells Bush of his displeasure of the {potential} rehiring of former DIO Stephen A. Kappes back to the CIA:

"I understand that Mr. Kappes is a capable, well-qualified, and well-liked former Directorate of Operations (DO) case officer. I am heartened by the professional qualities he would bring to the job, but concerned by what could be the political problems that he could bring back to the agency. There has been much public and private speculation about the politicization of the Agency. I am convinced that this politicization was underway well before Porter Goss became the Director. In fact, I have long been convinced that a strong and well-positioned group within the Agency intentionally undermined the Administration and its policies. This argument is supported by the Ambassador Wilson/Valerie Plame events, as well as by the string of unauthorized disclosures from an organization that prides itself with being able to keep secrets. I have come to the belief that, despite his service to the DO, Mr. Kappes may have been a part of this group. I must take note when my Democratic colleagues - those who so vehemently denounced and now publicly attacked the strong choice of Porter Goss as Director - now publicly support Mr. Kappes’s return."

Of course the fact that there was such a group as I have been telling you for over a year now. Additionally I also told readers to to relax on Kappes, as be assured that he would be read the riot act upon return. However, I've sinced learned that he might be back as "bait" as in "to catch a leaker".

Of coures one would think that this "revelation" of an "inside job" would be the big story, but nay, nay. Tom McGuire catches the irony in the Times story that concentrates NO time on this and instead refocuses on 'administrative disagreements" between Hoekstra's committee and the Administration - which is not a story.

Again, the Times seems to be getting themselves into a hole. Here's a twist. If Libby brings up this "rogue" angle in his defense - as Tom eludes to - it could bring the Valerie and Joe show into Federal Court and that would be an interesting show indeed, for it would reguire subpeneos of such Characters as Nicolas Kristoff, Walter Pincus, David Corn, to name a few. Imagine, the Libby trial could make the OJ trail look like traffic court!

Which makes me wonder, is this just all positioning by the Times because they can see the writing on the wall?

Hmmm, stay tuned.








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Able Danger - Sign Up - Get the Truth

Per the Able Danger Blog (newly added link), get over to this petition and sign ur name. Again, if there is any chance of true bi-partisan hearings, the people are going to have to speak up and loud.

Just do it!



Newsbusters Busts the MSM on Bush Event

Newsbusters, the blog of Brent Bozell's Media Research Center, exposes the MSM attempt to spin President Bush's meeting with troops into a 'staged event'.

Truth is that the event was not staged, the troops were telling their real feelings: that they support the war and our President.

I guess they might have this story mixed up with the "planted question" to Sec. Rumsfeld back in December 2004.

Yet, that wasn't the case here, Soldiers when asked, will tell you the truth.

Just like in this picture, they tell it like it is!











Michelle Malkin has links to other reactions. Also Blogs for Bush.

UPDATE I: Michelle has a further reponse from one of the soldiers in the video. Here's an excerpt:

"First of all, we were told that we would be speaking with the President of the United States, our Commander-in-Chief, President Bush, so I believe that it would have been totally irresponsible for us NOT to prepare some ideas, facts or comments that we wanted to share …