Skip to main content

Geneva Gitmo Perspective

Ok, while some of us are having our "WTF" moment in regards to yesterday's announcment of the US intention to confer GC protections to Gitmo Detainees, it's time for a little perspective.

First, this isn't the big frigging deal that people think it is. Whether or not the Supremes overstepped their authority or not (I too believe they did) - it's totally irrevelant at this point. They ruled. Bush could either tell them to sit on a stick, or create a "fix" until Congress can be made to make an adjustment. THIS is where I called it an act of genius as it will cause lines to be drawn in congress just before the midterms.

Affording GC protections isn't going to immediately release anyone from custody and indeed the SC ruled that they could be held indefinitely. Secondly, there is a lot of confusion between the GC and "miranda rights", they are not the same and in fact there is no connection between the two.

Additionally this does NOT deter interrogations or even some interrogation techiques which even under the GC are lawful. The US has actually always followed the GC since the outset of Gitmo, notwithstanding the baseless assertions of torture. The fact is that "there are ways to get people to talk" withint the confines of Article Three.

Andy McCarthy at NRO gives this perspective:

"There is much less than meets the eye to the Pentagon’s announcement today that enemy combatants at Gitmo will be accorded Geneva Convention protections. It is not an announcement (as it is being misconstrued in some places) that al Qaeda detainees are now considered honorable prisoners of war. What DoD is saying is that they get Common Article 3 protection, which is minimal: they are entitled to be treated humanely, which was already U.S. policy, and – consistent with what the Supreme Court has ruled – they may not be subjected to military commissions as currently designed. No one really thought the administration was going to decline to comply with the Court’s ruling, so how this marks a “Big Shift,” as the New York Times’ headline proclaims, is beyond me."

Again, just like forcing the Democrats to "put up or shut up" on withdrawing from Iraq, the "how do you really feel about terrorists" question will not be front and center in the Congress. Republicans are clear that terrorists do not fit the mold of prisoners of war, but are "thugs". Democrats? Well, it depends on what Sunday news show they happen to be on at the time they are asked.

The Bush administration didn't "give in" to anyone, they simply decided to hit the criticism head on.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Calling Mr. Fitzgerald?

**UPDATED AND BUMPED****

As I told you about in this post yesterday as a source confirmed to me that the Justice Department has launched a probe into the NSA leak. Mr. Risen, you are in trouble - prepare your defense. I told you so.

The White House will be announcing the probe at about 12:30pm. My source tells me that this probe will most likely result in another prosecutor being assigned as of course Fitzgerald is still busy/dizzy on the Plame/Game No-Leak. Additionally, other probes into other recent leaks such as the CIA 'prisons'leak is in the works as well. As I said, this is the NEW Bush - on the attack - it's no more Mr. Nice Guy!

About time! Also covering Michelle Malkin

*****End Update*********

UPDATE II: Looks like I owe my source big time as yet another tip comes true as the Washington Post is on the target list as well for the CIA Prison leak.

****End Update II*************************************

Update III: Via Fox: "The government has no legal right to…

Is the lid about to be blown off Able Danger?

Those who have been wishing for a full blown Able Danger investigation are about to get their wish. The "gate" has been unlocked.

9/11 Iraqi Connection

With Democrats calling for yet more investigations into pre-war intelligence, and Republicans like myself pushing back to help their 'sudden amnesia”, the growing stories of Able Danger and even China Gate, are beginning to make news.

The three main theories about why Able Danger hasn't gotten out of the "blog stage", are 1) To hide Clinton era responsibility for stopping the 9/11 attacks, and/or 2) To hide the truth behind China-Gate, or 3) The facts show that there in fact was a direct link between Iraq and 9/11.

Taking either one you can see why the Clinton worshipping MSM for the most part hasn't touched the story. Of the later point, Democrats, the MSM and even some of our investigations state that there was no 'direct' link between Iraq and 9/11. Say otherwise and the MSM will slice and di…

Able Danger - Pulling Back the Covers of the real Clinton Legacy

First, let's dispense with the bull crap. The meeting between Mohammed Atta and Iraqi Intelligence officer Al-Ani, on April 8th, 2001 happened.

Yet, just don't mention it to the MSM, becaue since May of 2002, the MSM declared an all out assault on the story. A meeting incidently, that the Czech government has to this date stood by.

Let's review a little history:

October 13, 2001: Story of the meeting is leaked from somewhere in the Czech foreign service.

yet.....

October 20, 2001: Ny Times, John Tagliabue writes a story citing other Czech officials said the meeting never took place.

so.....

October 26, 2001: Czech Minister of the Interior, Stanislav Gross has a press conference not only confirming the orginal report but giving further details of Atta's other trip to Prague in June 2000.

then.....

October 27, 2001: The NY Times "recants" the October 20th denial.

The story continues it's oddessy of 'back and forth' until May 1st, 2002, when Walter P…